The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks
Abstract
We generalize the graphical modeling approach of p* social influence models to develop discrete time models for the temporal evolution of social networks. Plausible general processes pertaining to network evolution are broadly discussed as a basis for across‐time dependence assumptions. Systematic temporal processes are construed as effects that are homogeneous across the network, and that reflect dynamics inherent in a particular social relation. Any one actor cannot control these dynamics, especially given that non‐dyadic configurations may be implicated, for instance, tendencies for various triadic configurations to be constructed or to collapse of over time. Non‐systematic processes, on the other hand, may pertain to the changing nature of a particular dyadic tie, or to change involving a particular sociotemporal neighborhood of the network. Non‐systematic processes are inhomogeneous across time and across the network, and are modeled as random. In constructing p* dependence graphs, systematic temporal processes may be represented, in part, by the perfect dependence assumption, whereby network across‐time dependencies “mirror” within‐time dependencies. We develop temporal perfect dependence models appropriate for Markov random graphs. To disentangle non‐systematic from systematic temporal processes is not straightforward, but the use of the constant tie assumption ‐ whereby ephemeral ties are assumed not to have influence across time ‐is one possible approach. We illustrate these models with three empirical examples: first, with an analysis of the Freeman EIES data; and then with data from a newly formed small training group involving two networks, trust and friendship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Cited by
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Discrete temporal models of social networks
Hanneke, S., Fu, W., & Xing, E. P. (2010) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-ejs548 · Cited by 587
4. A Relational Event Framework for Social Action
Butts, C. T. (2008) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2008.00203.x · Cited by 477
Kalish, Y., & Robins, G. (2006) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.004 · Cited by 412
Self-citationExponential-family random graph models for valued networks
Krivitsky, P. N. (2012) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-ejs696 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, G., & Pattison, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-41
- ISSN
- 0022-250X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5874
- OpenAlex
- W2077787974
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990243
- The paper
- Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2001). Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.