Cited by 412Complex Network Analysis TechniquesSocial Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure

Kalish, Yuval, Robins, Garry·2006·Social Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.04.004

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Borgatti, 1997, Structural holes: unpacking Burt's redundancy measures, Connections, 20, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalish, Y., & Robins, G.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Robins, Garry
Venue
Social Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
56-84
ISSN
0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161734804
Cited by
412
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Networks (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
structural holes, network closure, strength of weak ties, personal networks, social network structure, individualism, neuroticism, extraversion, perceived susceptibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review