The problem of rehearsal or mental practice
Abstract
The present study examines several methodological and conceptual problems which in the past have made it difficult to accept the hypothesis that mental practice facilitates behavioral skill. An experiment on skill in speech production is then reported which overcomes the methodological problems. Subjects practice producing a sentence at maximal rate either mentally (mental practice) or overtly (physical practice) and then produced a transfer sentence which was either related or unrelated. The maximal rate of speech was faster for related than unrelated transfer sentences, and the degree of transfer for the mental and physical practice conditions was equivalent. A theory was developed to explain these results and overcome the conceptual problems outlined in the introduction. Implications of the theory for several related phenomena are discussed: rehearsal, errors in action, automatization, control processes in motor skills, speed-up as a function of practice, the relative advantages of physical vs. mental practice, and the evoked potentials accompanying mental rehearsal of an action.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The speed of inner speech is significantly faster than overt speech.
“First, the speed of inner speech is significantly faster than overt speech (Mackay, 1981; Netsell et al., 2016), suggesting that inner speech may not be a fully fledged corollary discharge of the intended articulation.”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Mackay, 1981
Cites
Categorization of action slips
Norman, D. A. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.1.1 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The timing of mentally represented actions
Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80088-9 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior
MacKay, D. G. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.5.483 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Self-citationPhysical and Observational Practice Afford Unique Learning Opportunities
Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890009601357 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech
Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.8.1147 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J. (1992) · Experimental Slips and Human Error · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_10 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Pratts, J., Pobric, G., & Yao, B. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120399 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“First, the speed of inner speech is often faster than overt speech (Mackay, 1981; Netsell et al., 2016), suggesting that inner speech may not be a fully-fledged corollary discharge of the intended articulation.”
Background
- Authors
- Mackay, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mackay, Donald G.
- ORCID
- Mackay, Donald G.
- Venue
- Journal of Motor Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 274-285
- ISSN
- 0022-2895 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1027
- OpenAlex
- W2035839468
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Motor Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Keywords
- mental practice, rehearsal, speech production, skill acquisition, transfer of learning, motor skill learning, motor control, evoked potentials, motor errors, automation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review