Cited by 71Social Representations and IdentityNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

Errors in Inner Speech

Dell, Gary S., Repka, Renee J.·1992·Experimental Slips and Human Error

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_10

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dell, G. S., & Repka, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Experimental Slips and Human Error
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1992
Pages
237-262
OpenAlex
W1716087567
Cited by
71
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
inner speech, problem solving, reading and writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review