Cited by 3Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

XLIV.—On some external characters of Ruminant Artiodactyla.—Part VI. The Bovinæ

Pocock, R.I.·1918·Annals and Magazine of Natural History

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00222931808673786

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphology of the penis of the yak is characterized by a urethral canal that is produced into a short tube free from the terminal cushion-like thickening of the glans.

    “Morphology of the penis of the yak is characterized by ''a urethral canal [that] is produced into a short tube free from the terminal cushion-like thickening of the glans'' (Pocock 1918:454-455).”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Pocock 1918

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pocock, R. I.
Corresponding author
Pocock, R.I.
Venue
Annals and Magazine of Natural History
Published
1918-12
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
449-459
ISSN
0374-5481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314261991
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals and Magazine of Natural History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
cattle, external characters, external morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review