Cited by 25Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentTranslation Studies and Practices

Using Cognitive Interviewing for the Semantic Enhancement of Multilingual Versions of Personality Questionnaires

Daouk-Öyry, Lina, McDowal, Almuth·2013·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

We discuss the use of cognitive interviewing with bilinguals as an integral part of cross-cultural adaptation of personality questionnaires. The aim is to maximize semantic equivalence to increase the likelihood of items maintaining the intended structure and meaning in the target language. We refer to this part of adaptation as semantic enhancement, and integrate cognitive interviewing within it as a tool for scrutinizing translations, the connotative meaning, and the psychological impact of items across languages. During the adaptation of a work-based personality questionnaire from English to Arabic, Chinese (Mandarin), and Spanish, we cognitively interviewed 12 bilingual participants about 136 items in different languages (17% of all items), of which 67 were changed. A content analysis categorizing the reasons for amending items elicited 11 errors that affect 2 identified forms of semantic equivalence. We provide the resultant coding scheme as a framework for designing cognitive interviewing protocols and propose a procedure for implementing them. We discuss implications for theory and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891.2012.735300

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Goerman, P. (2006, March). An Examination of Pretesting Methods for Multicultural, Multilingual Surveys . Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Comparative Survey
  2. Hambleton, R. K., & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment , 11, 147-157.
  3. Sireci, S. G. (2005). Using bilinguals to evaluate the comparability of different language versions of a test. In R.K. Hambleton, P. Merenda, & C. Spielberger (Eds.). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 117-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daouk-Öyry, L., & McDowal, A.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2013-07
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
407-416
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2128233896
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
Keywords
cognitive interviewing, cross-cultural adaptation, personality tests, semantic equivalence, bilinguals, Arabic translation, Mandarin translation, Spanish translation, test item revision, connotation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Translations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review