Cited by 1,615Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Research synthesis: the practice of cognitive interviewing

Beatty, P. C., Willis, G. B.·2007·Public Opinion Quarterly

Abstract

Cognitive interviewing has emerged as one of the more prominent methods for identifying and correcting problems with survey questions. We define cognitive interviewing as the administration of draft survey questions while collecting additional verbal information about the survey responses, which is used to evaluate the quality of the response or to help determine whether the question is generating the information that its author intends. But beyond this general categorization, cognitive interviewing potentially includes a variety of activities that may be based on different assumptions about the type of data that are being collected and the role of the interviewer in that process. This synthesis reviews the range of current cognitive interviewing practices, focusing on three considerations: (1) what are the dominant paradigms of cognitive interviewing—what is produced under each, and what are their apparent advantages; (2) what key decisions about cognitive interview study design need to be made once the general approach is selected (e.g., who should be interviewed, how many interviews should be conducted, and how should probes be selected), and what bases exist for making these decisions; and (3) how cognitive interviewing data should be evaluated, and what standards of evidence exist for making questionnaire design decisions based on study findings. In considering these issues, we highlight where standards for best practices are not clearly defined, and suggest broad areas worthy of additional methodological research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/poq/nfm006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bates, Nancy, and Theresa J. DeMaio. 1989. "Using Cognitive Research Methods to Improve the Design of the Decennial Census Form." Proceedings of the U.S. Bureau of the Census Annual Research Conference 267-77.
  2. Beatty, Paul. 2002. "Cognitive Interview Evaluation of the Blood Donor History Screening Questionnaire." In Final Report of the AABB Task Force to Redesign the Blood Donor Screening Questionnaire. Report submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ______. 2003. Answerable Questions: Advances in the Methodology for Identifying and Resolving Questionnaire Problems in Survey Research. Doctoral Dissertation, the University of Michigan In Dissertation Abstracts International 64(09): 3504A.
  3. Stanley Presser, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elizabeth Martin, Jean Martin, and Eleanor Singer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  4. Beatty, Paul, Floyd J. Fowler, and Carol Cosenza. 2006. "Do Questionnaire Design Recommendations Lead to Measurable Improvements? Some Experiments with Alternate Versions of Complex Survey Questions." Proceedings of the Q2006 European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics. Available online at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/events/q2006/ downloads/T04_Beatty.doc.
  5. Blair, Johnny, Frederick Conrad, Allison Ackermann, and Greg Claxton. 2006. "The Effect of Sample Size on Cognitive Interview Findings." Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  6. Conrad, Frederick, and Johnny Blair. 1996. "From Impressions to Data: Increasing the Objectivity of Cognitive Interviews." 1996 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, Vol. 1, pp. 1-9. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  7. Conrad, Frederick, Johnny Blair, and Elena Tracy. 2000. "Verbal Reports Are Data! A Theoretical Approach to Cognitive Interviews." In Proceedings of the 1999 Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
  8. DeMaio, Theresa J., Susan Ciochetto, and Wendy Davis. 1993. "Research on the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals." 1993 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 1021-6. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  9. Stanley Presser, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elizabeth Martin, Jean Martin, and Eleanor Singer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  10. Stanley Presser, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elizabeth Martin, Jean Martin, and Eleanor Singer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  11. Ericsson, K. Anders., and Herbert A. Simon. 1980. "Verbal Reports as Data." Psychological Review 87:215-51.
  12. ______. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. Paul P. Biemer, Robert M. Groves, Lars E. Lyberg, Nancy A. Mathiowetz, and Seymour Sudman. New York: Wiley.
  14. Stanley Presser, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elizabeth Martin, Jean Martin, and Eleanor Singer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  15. Monroe G. Sirken, Douglas J. Herrmann, Susan Schechter, Norbert Schwarz, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau. New York: Wiley.
  16. Thomas B. Jabine, Miron L. Straf, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  17. Miller, Kristen. 2002. "The Role of Social Location in Question Response: Rural Poor Experience Answering General Health Questions." Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference held in St. Pete Beach, Florida, May 2002.
  18. ______. 2005. "Q-Bank: Development of a Tested-Question Database." 2005 Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics, pp. 1352-9. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  19. O'Muircheartaigh, Colm. 1999. "CASM: Successes, Failures, and Potential." In Cognition and Survey Research, ed. Monroe G. Sirken, Douglas J. Herrmann, Susan Schechter, Norbert Schwarz, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau. New York: Wiley.
  20. Oksenberg, Lois, Charles F. Cannell, and Graham Kalton. 1991. "New Strategies for Pretesting Survey Questions." Journal of Official Statistics 7:349-65.
  21. Presser, Stanley. 1989. "Pretesting: A Neglected Aspect of Survey Research.'" In Conference Proceedings: Health Survey Research Methods, ed.
  22. Redline, Cleo, Richard Smiley, Meredith Lee, Theresa DeMaio, and Don Dillman, D. 1998. "Beyond Concurrent Interviews: An Evaluation of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques for Self- Administered Questionnaires." 1998 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 900-5, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  23. Royston, Patricia N. 1989. "Using Intensive Interviews to Evaluate Questions." In Conference Proceedings: Health Survey Research Methods, ed.
  24. Royston, Patricia N., and Deborah Bercini. 1987. "Questionnaire Design Research in a Laboratory Setting: Results of Testing Cancer Risk Factor Questions." 1987 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 829-33. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  25. Norbert Schwarz, Denise Park, Barbel Knauper, and Seymour Sudman. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  26. Schechter, Susan, Johnny Blair, and Janet Vande Hey. 1996. "Conducting Cognitive Interviews to Test Self-Administered and Telephone Surveys: Which Methods Should We Use?" 1996 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 10-7. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
  27. Monroe G. Sirken, Douglas J. Herrmann, Susan Schechter, Norbert Schwarz, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau. New York: Wiley.
  28. Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interviewing Studies. New York: The Free Press.
  29. Monroe G. Sirken, Douglas J. Herrmann, Susan Schechter, Norbert Schwarz, Judith M. Tanur, and Roger Tourangeau. New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
287-311
ISSN
  • 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5331
OpenAlex
W2096834156
Cited by
1,615
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 145 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 40
FWCI
52.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
cognitive interviewing, questionnaire development, questionnaire evaluation, probe selection, interviewer role, evidence standards, best practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review