The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts
Abstract
Monogamy tends to equalise mate competition between the sexes. However, women show greater restraint in their use of direct intrasexual aggression, which, I argue, is a result of their higher parental investment and the consequently greater reproductive cost of injury or death. Women usually compete for mates by advertising qualities valued by men (beauty and sexual exclusiveness) and by using indirect means of denigrating rivals (through gossip and stigmatisation). However, where well-resourced men are in short supply, women must find alternative sources of support or escalate their competition for male partners to physical levels. Data from criminology, psychology, evolutionary biology, and anthropology are used to support these proposals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204 · Cited by 4,253
Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 · Cited by 3,723
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429 · cited 1×
“Problematically, men (and women) universally seem to agree on standards of female facial beauty, making it hard to choose between the two accounts (Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundBelsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131166 · Cited by 1,780
Cited by
The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice.
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., Hawley, P. H., Jacobs, W. J., James, J., Volk, A. A., et al. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026220 · Cited by 745
Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations.
Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0018413 · Cited by 482
Selective Self-Presentation and Social Comparison Through Photographs on Social Networking Sites
Fox, J., & Vendemia, M. A. (2016) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0248 · Cited by 310
Testosterone reactivity to competition and competitive endurance in men and women
Casto, K. V., Edwards, D. A., Akinola, M., Davis, C., & Mehta, P. H. (2020) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104665 · Cited by 43
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.654 · Cited by 23
The Cocksure Conundrum: How Evolution Created a Gendered Currency of Corporate Overconfidence
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W. (2022) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-022-00197-5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-26
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2036040732
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
