Cited by 4Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The Cocksure Conundrum: How Evolution Created a Gendered Currency of Corporate Overconfidence

Open access
Ronay, Richard, Maddux, William W., von Hippel, William·2022·Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

Abstract

Biological differences between men and women mandate that women’s obligatory investment in reproduction is significantly greater than that of men. As a result, women have evolved to be the “choosier” of the two sexes and men have evolved to compete for female choice. To the degree that overconfidence is an effective tool for attracting mates and driving away competitors, greater competition among men suggests that they should express more overconfidence than women. Thus, sexual selection may be the primary reason why overconfidence is typically more pronounced in men than it is in women. Sexual selection may also be a distal, causal factor in what we describe as a cult of overconfidence pervading modern organizations and institutions. Whereas overconfidence was once regulated and constrained by features of ancestral life, levels of social mobility and accountability in contemporary society and modern organizations make it increasingly difficult to keep this gendered bias in check.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40750-022-00197-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Female mate preferences tend to emphasize men's commitment and ability to acquire resources, traits that are partially hidden and therefore require signaling.

    “In humans, female mate preferences tend to emphasize men ' s commitment and ability to acquire resources, traits that are partially hidden and therefore require signaling (Ronay et al., 2022; von Hippel &Trivers, 2011a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 163

  1. Adam, T. R., Fernando, C. S., & Golubeva, E. (2015). Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60(195), 208. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jbank fin. 2015. 07. 013 · DOI
  2. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219-235. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1287/ mnsc. 1110. 1452 · DOI
  3. Adams, E. S., & Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (1995). The cost of threat displays and the stability of decep- tive communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 175(4), 405-421. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ jtbi. 1995. 0151 · DOI
  4. Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psy- chological Science, 18(5), 295-298. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1467-8721. 2009. 01655.x · DOI
  5. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton University Press.
  6. Andersson, M., & Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(2), 53-58. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0169-5347(96) 81042-1 · DOI
  7. Angilletta, M. J., Jr, Kubitz, G., & Wilson, R. S. (2019). Self-deception in nonhuman animals: Weak crayfish escalated aggression as if they were strong. Behavioral Ecology, 30(5), 1469-1476. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ beheco/ arz103 · DOI
  8. Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 384-390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2008. 07. 001 · DOI
  9. Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: a social-role analy- sis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 133-153. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1207/ s1532 7957p spr10 02_3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). A career lexicon for the 21st century. Academy of Management Perspectives, 10(4), 28-39. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5465/ ame. 1996. 31453 17 · DOI
  11. Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003). Nice girls don't ask. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 14-14.
  12. Baker, M. D., Jr, & Maner, J. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1136-1139. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 06. 006 · DOI
  13. Balaresque, P., Manni, F., Dugoujon, J. M., Crousau-Roy, B., & Heyer, E. (2006). Estimating sex-specific processes in human populations: are XY-homologous markers an effective tool? Heredity, 96(3), 214-221. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ sj. hdy. 68007 79 · DOI
  14. Barkow, J. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 627-637). Oxford University Press.
  15. Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. (2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23(2), 323-340. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1287/ orsc. 1110. 0734 · DOI
  16. Bengtsson, C., Persson, M., & Willenhag, P. (2005). Gender and overconfidence. Economics Letters, 86(2), 199-203. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. econl et. 2004. 07. 012 · DOI
  17. Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensure Sortis. In Cementer Academia Scientiarum Imperalis Petropolitanae. (pp. 175-192). St. Petersburg Academy.
  18. Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Human Behavior and Evolution, 33, 309-317. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2011. 10. 008 · DOI
  19. Betzig, L. (2021). Reproductive variance. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 56-69). Sage.
  20. Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35), 8722-8727. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 17179 59115 · DOI
  21. Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50), 25029- 25033. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 19098 06116 · DOI
  22. Boehm, C. (1997). Impact of the human egalitarian syndrome on Darwinian selection mechanics. The American Naturalist, 150, S100-S121. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 286052 · DOI
  23. Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: the evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press.
  24. Bolton, P., Brunnermeier, M. K., & Veldkamp, L. (2012). Leadership, coordination, and corporate cul- ture. The Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), 512-537. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ restud/ rds041 · DOI
  25. Broihanne, M. H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behavior of finance professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11(2), 64-73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. frl. 2013. 11. 002 · DOI
  26. Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, image, and impression management. Wiley.
  27. Brooks, R. (2021). Artificial intimacy: virtual friends, digital lovers, and algorithmic matchmakers. Columbia University Press.
  28. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0140 525X0 00239 92 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Butterworth, J., Trivers, R., & von Hippel, W. (2022). The better to fool you with: deception and self- deception. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101385. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. copsyc. 2022. 101385 · DOI
  30. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
  31. Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach. The American Economic Review, 89, 306-318. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1257/ aer. 89.1. 306 · DOI
  32. Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford University Press.
  33. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16-26. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00224 49040 95522 · DOI
  34. Campbell, N. K., & Hackett, H. (1986). The effects of mathematics task performance on math self-effi- cacy and task interest. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 28(2), 149-162. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0001-8791(86) 90048-5 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Chaine, A. S., Shizuka, D., Block, T. A., Zhang, L., & Lyon, B. E. (2018). Manipulating badges of status only fools strangers. Ecology Letters, 21(10), 1477-1485. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ ele. 13128 · DOI
  36. Cheng, J. T., Anderson, C., Tenney, E. R., Brion, S., Moore, D. A., & Logg, J. M. (2021). The social transmission of overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 157-186. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ xge00 00787 · DOI
  37. Chrobot-Mason, D., Hoobler, J. M., & Burno, J. (2019). Lean In versus the literature: an evidence-based examination. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(1), 110-130. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5465/ amp. 2016. 0156 · DOI
  38. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Prince-Ton University Press. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1046/j. 1420-9101. 1992. 50407 19.x Clutton-Brock, T. H., Russell, A. F., Sharpe, L. L., Young, A. J., Balmforth, Z., & McIlrath, G. M. (2002). Evolution and development of sex differences in cooperative behavior in meerkats. Science, 297(5579), 253-256. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 10714 12 · DOI
  39. Coates, J. M., & Herbert, J. (2008). Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(16), 6167-6172. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 07040 25105 · DOI
  40. Cook, L. M., & Saccheri, I. J. (2013). The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study. Heredity, 110(3), 207-212. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5061/ dryad. 96226 2h9 · DOI
  41. Cueva, C., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Ponti, G., & Tomás, J. (2019). Boys will still be boys: gender differences in trading activity are not due to differences in (over)confidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 160, 100-120. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jebo. 2019. 02. 027 · DOI
  42. Cummins, J. (2001). Mitochondrial DNA and the Y chromosome: parallels and paradoxes. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 13(8), 533-542. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1071/ RD010 64 · DOI
  43. Dabbs, J. M., & Dabbs, M. G. (2000). Heroes, rogues, and lovers: testosterone and behavior. McGraw-Hill.
  44. Dalton, P. S., & Ghosal, S. (2018). Self-confidence, overconfidence and prenatal testosterone exposure: evidence from the lab. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 5. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 23976 · DOI
  45. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior. Willard Grant Press.
  46. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2005). Carpe diem: adaptation and devaluing the future. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(1), 55-60. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 431025 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1989). Homicide and cultural evolution. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10(1-3), 99-110. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0162-3095(89) 90014-9 · DOI
  48. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1997). Crime and conflict: homicide in evolutionary psychological perspective. Crime and Justice, 22, 51-100. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 449260 · DOI
  49. da Silva, E. B., Silva, T. C., Constantino, M., Amancio, D. R., & Tabak, B. M. (2020). Overconfidence and the 2D: 4D ratio. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 25, 100278. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jbef. 2020. 100278 · DOI
  50. Dekel, E., & Scotchmer, S. (1999). On the evolution of attitudes towards risk in winner-take-all games. Journal of Economic Theory, 87(1), 125-143. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ jeth. 1999. 2537 · DOI
  51. Dor, D. (2017). The role of the lie in the evolution of human language. Language Sciences, 63, 44-59. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. langs ci. 2017. 01. 001 · DOI
  52. Dunning, D., Leuenberger, A., & Sherman, D. A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: are self- serving theories of success a product of motivational forces? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 58-68.
  53. Epley, N., & Whitchurch, E. (2008). Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition. Per- sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(9), 1159-1170. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67208 318601 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) esti- mates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 5-17. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 84.1.5 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Sci- ence, 197(4300), 215-223. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. 327542 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Erkut, S. (1983). Exploring sex differences in expectancy, attribution, and academic achievement. Sex Roles, 9(2), 217-231. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF002 89625 · DOI
  57. Farthing, G. W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 171-185. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2004. 08. 004 · DOI
  58. Fessler, D. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: an evolu- tionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 107-123. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2004. 06. 006 · DOI
  59. Fridel, E. E., & Fox, J. A. (2019). Gender differences in patterns and trends in US homicide, 1976-2017. Violence and Gender, 6(1), 27-36. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1089/ vio. 2019. 0005 · DOI
  60. Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. The Journal of Politi- cal Economy, 56(4), 279-304. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 256692 · DOI
  61. Gietl, D., & Kassner, B. (2020). Managerial overconfidence and bank bailouts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179, 202-222. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jebo. 2020. 08. 019 · DOI
  62. Goel, A. M., & Thakor, A. V. (2008). Overconfidence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2737-2784. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1540-6261. 2008. 01412.x · DOI
  63. Hammer, M. F., Mendez, F. L., Cox, M. P., Woerner, A. E., & Wall, J. D. (2008). Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity. PLoS Genetics, 4(9), e1000202. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pgen. 10002 02 · DOI
  64. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross- sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81-91. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 78.1. 81 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Haynes, M. C., & Heilman, M. E. (2013). It had to be you (not me)! Women's attributional rationalization of their contribution to successful joint work outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle- tin, 39(7), 956-969. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67213 486358 · DOI
  66. Hayward, M. L., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Believing one's own press: the causes and con- sequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 637-653. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ smj. 405 · DOI
  67. Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: how the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Penguin UK.
  68. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mecha- nism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165-196. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S1090-5138(00) 00071-4 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29-29.
  70. Ho, P.-H., Huang, C.-W., Lin, C.-Y., & Yen, J.-F. (2016). CEO overconfidence and financial crisis: evi- dence from bank lending and leverage. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(1), 194-209. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jfine co. 2015. 04. 007 · DOI
  71. Holekamp, K. E., Smale, L., & Szykman, M. (1996). Rank and reproduction in the female spotted hyaena. Reproduction, 108(2), 229-237. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1530/ jrf.0. 10802 29 · DOI
  72. Hopcroft, R. L. (2006). Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolu- tion and Human Behavior, 27(2), 104-120. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. evolh umbeh av. 2005. 07. 004 · DOI
  73. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathemat- ics attitudes and affect: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299-324. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1990. tb000 22.x · DOI
  74. Johnson, D. D., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). The evolution of overconfidence. Nature, 477(7364), 317-320. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e10384 · DOI
  75. Johnson, D. D., McDermott, R., Barrett, E. S., Cowden, J., Wrangham, R., McIntyre, M. H., & Peter Rosen, S. (2006). Overconfidence in wargames: experimental evidence on expectations, aggres- sion, gender and testosterone. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1600), 2513-2520. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rspb. 2006. 3606 · DOI
  76. Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C., & Moore, D. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 266-279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2013. 08. 005 · DOI
  77. Knight, E. L., Morales, P. J., Christian, C. B., Prasad, S., Harbaugh, W. T., Mehta, P. H., & Mayr, U. (2022). The causal effect of testosterone on men's competitive behavior is moderated by basal cortisol and cues to an opponent's status: evidence for a context-dependent dual-hormone hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ pspa0 000305 · DOI
  78. Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(4), 919-948. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2008. 01540.x · DOI
  79. Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: perceived self- efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25, 385-400. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ deci. 1994. 25. issue-3 · DOI
  80. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
  81. Kruger, D. J. (2007). The importance of multi-level theoretical integration in biopsychosocial research. Psihologijske teme, 16(2), 225-240. orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-7016.
  82. Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2004). Sexual selection and the male: female mortality ratio. Evolutionary Psychology, 2(1), 66-85. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14747 04904 00200 112 · DOI
  83. Kurath, J., & Mata, R. (2018). Individual differences in risk taking and endogeneous levels of testos- terone, estradiol, and cortisol: a systematic literature search and three independent meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 428-446. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. neubi orev. 2018. 05. 003 · DOI
  84. LaNoue, J. B., & Curtis, R. C. (1985). Improving women's performance in mixed-sex situations by effort attributions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 337-356. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1471-6402. 1985. tb008 85.x · DOI
  85. Lenney, E. (1977). Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 1-13. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0033-2909. 84.1.1 · DOI
  86. Ligon, R. A., & McGraw, K. J. (2016). Social costs enforce honesty of a dynamic signal of motivation. Proceedings of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 283(1841), 20161873. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rspb. 2016. 1873 · DOI
  87. Lindeman, M., Sundvik, L., & Rouhiainen, P. (1995). Under-or overestimation of self?: Person variables and self-assessment accuracy in work settings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(1), 123-134.
  88. Loughnan, S., Kuppens, P., Allik, J., Balazs, K., De Lemus, S., Dumont, K., … Haslam, N. (2011). Eco- nomic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1254-1258. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09567 97611 417003 · DOI
  89. MacLaren, N. G., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Sayama, H., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., … Ruark, G. A. (2020). Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(5), 101409. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. leaqua. 2020. 101409 · DOI
  90. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overcon- fidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649-659. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1540-6261. 2005. 00813.x · DOI
  91. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reac- tion. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 20-43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jfine co. 2007. 07. 002 · DOI
  92. Maner, J. K., & Hasty, C. R. (2022). Life history strategies, prestige, and dominance: an evolution- ary developmental view of social hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672221078667. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67222 10786 · DOI
  93. Mannocci, A., Saulle, R., Villari, P., & La Torre, G. (2019). Male gender, age and low income are risk factors for road traffic injuries among adolescents: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 263-272. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10389-018-0932-6 · DOI
  94. Marcus, D. K., & Miller, R. S. (2003). Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: a social relations analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 325-335. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67202 250193 · DOI
  95. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0033-295X. 98.2. 224 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Marlowe, F. (2010). The Hadza: hunter-gatherers of Tanzania (Vol. 3). Univerisity of California Press.
  97. Maynard Smith, J. (1976). Evolution and the theory of games: in situations characterized by conflict of interest, the best strategy to adopt depends on what others are doing. American Scientist, 64, 41-45. · DOI
  98. Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15-18. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 24601 5a0 · DOI
  99. Megarry, T. (1995). Society in prehistory: The origins of human culture. NYU Press.
  100. Mehta, P. H., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., & Carré, J. M. (2015). Testosterone and cortisol jointly modulate risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 56, 88-99. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. psyne uen. 2015. 02. 023 · DOI
  101. Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 701-717. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 76.5. 701 · DOI
  102. Morgan, D., Grant, K. A., Gage, H. D., Mach, R. H., Kaplan, J. R., Prioleau, O., Nader, S. H., Buch- heimer, N., Ehrenkaufer, R. L., & Nader, M. A. (2002). Social dominance in monkeys: Dopamine D2 receptors and cocaine self-administration. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 169-174. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ nn798 · DOI · Paper page
  103. Moore, C. (1996). Evolution and the modularity of mind reading. Cognitive Development, 11, 605-621. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0885-2014(96) 90019-2 · DOI
  104. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502-517. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0033-295X. 115.2. 502 · DOI · Paper page
  105. Moore, J. C., Obbard, D. J., Reuter, C., West, S. A., & Cook, J. M. (2009). Male morphology and dishon- est signalling in a fig wasp. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 147-153. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. anbeh av. 2009. 04. 006 · DOI
  106. Mura, R. (1987). Sex-related differences in expectations of success in undergraduate mathematics. Jour- nal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(1), 15-24. https:// doi. org/ 10. 5951/ jrese mathe duc. 18.1. 0015 · DOI
  107. Murphy, S. C., von Hippel, W., Dubbs, S. L., Angilletta, M. J., Jr, Wilson, R. S., Trivers, R., & Barlow, F. K. (2015). The role of overconfidence in romantic desirability and competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1036-1052. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67215 588754 · DOI
  108. Muthukrishna, M., Henrich, J., Toyokawa, W., Hamamura, T., Kameda, T., & Heine, S. J. (2018). Over- confidence is universal? Elicitation of Genuine Overconfidence (EGO) procedure reveals system- atic differences across domain, task knowledge, and incentives in four populations. PLoS One1, 13(8), e0202288. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02022 88 · DOI
  109. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1162/ qjec. 122.3. 1067 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Noë, R., de Waal, F. B., & van Hooff, J. A. (1980). Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony. Folia Primatologica, 34(1-2), 90-110. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1159/ 00015 5949 · DOI
  111. O'Laughlin, E. M., & Brubaker, B. S. (1998). Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: gender differences in self report versus performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(5), 595-601. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0191-8869(97) 00237-7 · DOI
  112. Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5-21. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17456 91609 356781 · DOI
  113. Pallier, G. (2003). Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 48(5-6), 265-276. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1023/A: 10228 77405 718 · DOI
  114. Pereira, K. J., da Silva, C. S. A., Havlíček, J., Kleisner, K., Varella, M. A. C., Pavlovič, O., & Valen- tova, J. V. (2019). Femininity-masculinity and attractiveness-Associations between self-ratings, third-party ratings and objective measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 166-171. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. paid. 2019. 04. 033 · DOI
  115. Prince, M. (1993). Women, men, and money styles. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(1), 175-182. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0167-4870(93) 90045-M Real, L., & Caraco, T. (1986). Risk and foraging in stochastic environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 371-390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1146/ annur ev. es. 17. 110186. 002103 · DOI
  116. Reuben, E., Rey-Biel, P., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2012). The emergence of male leadership in com- petitive environments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 111-117. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jebo. 2011. 06. 016 · DOI
  117. Rohwer, S., & Rohwer, F. C. (1978). Status signalling in Harris sparrows: experimental deceptions achieved. Animal Behaviour, 26, 1012-1022. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0003-3472(78) 90090-8 · DOI
  118. Ronay, R., & Hippel, W. V. (2010). The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physi- cal risk taking in young men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 57-64. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 19485 50609 352807 · DOI
  119. Ronay, R., Oostrom, J. K., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Mayoral, S., & Rusch, H. (2019). Playing the trump card: why we select overconfident leaders and why it matters. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(6), 101316. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. leaqua. 2019. 101316 · DOI
  120. Ronay, R., Tybur, J. M., van Huijstee, D., & Morssinkhof, M. (2017). Embodied power, testosterone, and overconfidence as a causal pathway to risk-taking. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(1), 28-43. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 23743 603. 2016. 12480 81 · DOI
  121. Ronay, R., Van der Meij, L., Oostrom, J. K., & Pollet, T. V. (2018). No evidence for a relationship between hair testosterone concentrations and 2D: 4D ratio or risk taking. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 30. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fnbeh. 2018. 00030 · DOI
  122. Rubin, P. H., & Paul, C. W. (1979). An evolutionary model of taste for risk. Economic Inquiry, 17, 585- 596. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1465-7295. 1979. tb005 49.x · DOI
  123. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereo- typical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629-645. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 74.3. 629 · DOI · Paper page
  124. San Martin, A., Swaab, R. I., Sinaceur, M., & Vasiljevic, D. (2015). The double-edged impact of future expectations in groups: minority influence depends on minorities' and majorities' expectations to interact again. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 49-60. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2015. 03. 002 · DOI
  125. Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. L. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 311-329. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jacce co. 2011. 09. 001 · DOI
  126. Schultz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019). The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366(6466), eaau5141. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1126/ scien ce. aau51 41 · DOI
  127. Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60-79. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514. 84.1. 60 · DOI · Paper page
  128. Seielstad, M. T., Minch, E., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1998). Genetic evidence for a higher female migra- tion rate in humans. Nature Genetics, 20(3), 278-280. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 3088 · DOI
  129. Sheedy, E., & Lubojanski, M. (2018). Risk management behaviour in banking. Managerial Finance, 44(7), 902-918. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ MF-11-2017-0465 · DOI
  130. Sheffer, L., & Loewen, P. (2019). Electoral confidence, overconfidence, and risky behavior: evidence from a study with elected politicians. Political Behavior, 41(1), 31-51. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11109-017-9438-0 · DOI
  131. Sherman, G. D., & Mehta, P. H. (2020). Stress, cortisol, and social hierarchy. Current Opinion in Psy- chology, 33, 227-232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. copsyc. 2019. 09. 013 · DOI
  132. Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). When confidence is detrimental: Influence of overconfidence on leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 649-665. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. leaqua. 2011. 05. 006 · DOI
  133. Soldà, A., Ke, C., von Hippel, W. & Page, L. (2021). Absolute vs. relative success: why overconfidence is an inefficient equilibrium. Psychological Science, 32, 1662-1674. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09567 97621 10074 · DOI
  134. Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achieve- ment. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 80-90. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. lindif. 2008. 05. 004 · DOI
  135. Stewart-Williams, S., & Thomas, A. G. (2013). The ape that thought it was a peacock: does evolutionary psychology exaggerate human sex differences? Psychological Inquiry, 24(3), 137-168. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 10478 40X. 2013. 804899 · DOI
  136. Stoneking, M. (1998). Women on the move. Nature Genetics, 20(3), 219-220. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ 3012 · DOI
  137. Számadó, S. (2000). Cheating as a mixed strategy in a simple model of aggressive communication. Ani- mal Behaviour, 59(1), 221-230. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ anbe. 1999. 1293 · DOI
  138. Számadó, S. (2003). Threat displays are not handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 221(3), 327-348. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ jtbi. 2003. 3176 · DOI
  139. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on men- tal health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193.
  140. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411-429. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ 0033-295X. 107.3. 411 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Tenney, E. R., MacCoun, R. J., Spellman, B. A., & Hastie, R. (2007). Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psychological Science, 18, 46-50. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2007. 01847.x · DOI
  142. Tenney, E. R., Meikle, N. L., Hunsaker, D., Moore, D. A., & Anderson, C. (2019). Is overconfidence a social liability? The effect of verbal versus nonverbal expressions of confidence. Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology, 116(3), 396-415. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ pspi0 000150 · DOI
  143. Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2004). A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature, 432(7014), 218-222. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ natur e02949 · DOI
  144. Tibbetts, E. A., & Izzo, A. (2010). Social punishment of dishonest signalers caused by mismatch between signal and behavior. Current Biology, 20(18), 1637-1640. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. cub. 2010. 07. 042 · DOI
  145. Tracy, J. L., & Beall, A. T. (2011). Happy guys finish last: the impact of emotion expressions on sexual attraction. Emotion, 11(6), 1379. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ a0022 902 · DOI
  146. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Aldine-Atherton.
  147. Turke, P. W., & Betzig, L. L. (1985). Those who can do: wealth, status, and reproductive success on Ifa- luk. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(2), 79-87. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0162-3095(85) 90001-9 · DOI
  148. Udry, J. R., & Eckland, B. K. (1984). Benefits of being attractive: Differential payoffs for men and women. Psychological Reports, 54, 47-56. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2466/ pr0. 1984. 54.1. 47 · DOI
  149. Van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J., Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Tuiten, A., & Koppeschaar, H. (2004). Testos- terone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(7), 937-943. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. psyne uen. 2003. 08. 007 · DOI
  150. van Prooijen, J. W. (2021). Overconfidence in radical politics. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The psychology of populism (pp. 143-157). Routledge.
  151. von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011a). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 26-27. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0140 525X1 00026 69 · DOI
  152. von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011b). Reflections on self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 41-56. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0140 525X1 00030 18 · DOI
  153. Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to domi- nance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 278(1715), 2223- 2232. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rspb. 2010. 2145 · DOI
  154. Von Rueden, C. R., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men's status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10824-10829. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1073/ pnas. 16068 00113 · DOI
  155. Wang, C. S., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2010). The cultural dynamics of rewarding honesty and punishing deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1529-1542. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 01461 67210 385921 · DOI
  156. White, R. E., Thornhill, S., & Hampson, E. (2006). Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: the relation- ship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 21-34. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2005. 11. 001 · DOI
  157. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59-73. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ 0162-3095(85) 90041-X · DOI
  158. Wingfield, J. C. (2017). The challenge hypothesis: where it began and relevance to humans. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 9-12. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. yhbeh. 2016. 11. 008 · DOI
  159. Wittenberg-Cox, A. (2013). Stop fixing women, start building management competencies. In Handbook of Research on Promoting Women's Careers. Edward Elgar Publishing. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4337/ 97808 57938 961. 00011 · DOI
  160. Yamagishi, T. (1988). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psy- chology Quarterly, 265-271. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 27869 24 · DOI
  161. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiva- tion and Emotion, 18(2), 129-166. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ BF022 49397 · DOI · Paper page
  162. Yates, J. F., Lee, J. W., & Bush, J. G. (1997). General knowledge overconfidence: cross-national vari- ations, response style, and "reality". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 87-94. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1006/ obhd. 1997. 2696 · DOI
  163. Zemba, Y., Young, M. J., & Morris, M. W. (2006). Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: proxy logic in collective-versus individual-agency cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes, 101(1), 36-51. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2006. 04. 007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Ronay, Richard
Venue
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
557-578
ISSN
2198-7335 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292358523
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
overconfidence, gender differences, sexual selection, evolutionary psychology, mate choice, reproductive investment, organizational culture, organizational behavior, social mobility, accountability, gender bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review