The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eroticizing Inequality in the United States: The Consequences and Determinants of Traditional Gender Role Adherence in Intimate Relationships
Abstract
This article reviews the research on traditional gender-role adherence and sexuality for heterosexual men and women. Specifically, the consequences and predictors of following traditional gender roles of female submissiveness and male dominance in sexual relationships is examined. Despite evidence that men and women's sexual roles are becoming more egalitarian over time, empirical evidence suggests that the traditional sexual roles continue to dominate heterosexual relations. This article explores whether the sexual context is one in which both men and women feel particularly compelled to engage in gender stereotypic behavior, and why. In addition, this article reports on research that finds that men and women have automatic associations between sexuality and power that reinforce their gender stereotypic behavior in sexual contexts. The negative effects of traditional gender-role adherence for women's sexual problems and satisfaction is demonstrated. This article concludes that traditional sexual scripts are harmful for both women's and men's ability to engage in authentic, rewarding sexual expression, although the female submissive role may be particularly debilitating. Future directions of research are suggested, including interventions to reduce women's adherence to the sexually submissive female script.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176
Sexual Dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and Predictors
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.537 · Cited by 5,119
Rudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationPrentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066 · Cited by 1,501
Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700502 · Cited by 981
A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017504 · Cited by 931
Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003 · Cited by 776
Self-citationCooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528 · Cited by 586
Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression
Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R., & Arzu Wasti, S. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208331161 · Cited by 493
Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490309552164 · Cited by 372
Cited by
He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards
Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319891310 · Cited by 200
Bowman, J. M., & Compton, B. L. (2014) · The Journal of Men’s Studies · doi:10.3149/jms.2203.207 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 168-183
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W1987995073
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 28.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eroticizing Inequality in the United States: The Consequences and Determinants of Traditional Gender Role Adherence in Intimate Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
- The paper
- Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing Inequality in the United States: The Consequences and Determinants of Traditional Gender Role Adherence in Intimate Relationships. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.