Cited by 776Gender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyGender and Feminist Studies

Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations

Rudman, Laurie A., Phelan, Julie E.·2008·Research in Organizational Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Rudman, Laurie A.
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Pages
61-79
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016395556
Cited by
776
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
FWCI
24.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
backlash, gender stereotypes, impression management, women in leadership, women in organizations, gender parity, turnover, women in management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review