Cited by 36Social and Intergroup PsychologyLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist Studies

Using Electronic Contact to Reduce Homonegative Attitudes, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions Among Heterosexual Women and Men: A Contemporary Extension of the Contact Hypothesis

White, Fiona A., Verrelli, Stefano, Maunder, Rachel D., Kervinen, Angus·2019·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

The current study experimentally examined the potential for a contemporary extension of the contact hypothesis, known as electronic contact, or E-contact, to reduce sexual prejudice, intergroup anxiety, and avoidant behavioral intentions among heterosexuals. It also extended the sexual minority contact literature by examining the role of participant and interaction partner sex as a possible boundary condition of this contact-prejudice relationship. To test our hypotheses, 140 heterosexual female and male university students were randomly allocated to interact with a homosexual or heterosexual, female or male E-contact partner, in a collaborative and text-only online interaction before completing the outcome measures. Overall, the results demonstrated that interacting online with a female, as opposed to a male, homosexual E-contact partner reduced heterosexual men's feelings of intergroup anxiety, which in turn was associated with lower sexual prejudice and outgroup avoidance. For heterosexual women, however, E-contact did not influence the outcome variables. In the context of sexual prejudice, these results suggest that E-contact may be particularly useful as a prejudice-reduction strategy among individuals who typically require it most: heterosexual men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2018.1491943

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electronic contact has been used as a strategy for promoting awareness and reducing prejudice among ideologically different groups.

    “Finally, as an innovative intervention, electronic contact (e-contact)—defined as “computer-mediated real-time interactions where members of different groups interact online” through virtual media with mental health services users [20]—has been used as a strategy for promoting awareness and reducing prejudice among ideologically different groups [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, F. A., Verrelli, S., Maunder, R. D., & Kervinen, A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
White, Fiona A.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
1179-1191
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W2883277381
Cited by
36
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
electronic contacts, contact hypothesis, sexual prejudice, intergroup anxiety, heterosexual men, prejudice reduction
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Heterosexuality, Young Adult, Text Messaging, Homophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review