Using Electronic Contact to Reduce Homonegative Attitudes, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions Among Heterosexual Women and Men: A Contemporary Extension of the Contact Hypothesis
Abstract
The current study experimentally examined the potential for a contemporary extension of the contact hypothesis, known as electronic contact, or E-contact, to reduce sexual prejudice, intergroup anxiety, and avoidant behavioral intentions among heterosexuals. It also extended the sexual minority contact literature by examining the role of participant and interaction partner sex as a possible boundary condition of this contact-prejudice relationship. To test our hypotheses, 140 heterosexual female and male university students were randomly allocated to interact with a homosexual or heterosexual, female or male E-contact partner, in a collaborative and text-only online interaction before completing the outcome measures. Overall, the results demonstrated that interacting online with a female, as opposed to a male, homosexual E-contact partner reduced heterosexual men's feelings of intergroup anxiety, which in turn was associated with lower sexual prejudice and outgroup avoidance. For heterosexual women, however, E-contact did not influence the outcome variables. In the context of sexual prejudice, these results suggest that E-contact may be particularly useful as a prejudice-reduction strategy among individuals who typically require it most: heterosexual men.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electronic contact has been used as a strategy for promoting awareness and reducing prejudice among ideologically different groups.
“Finally, as an innovative intervention, electronic contact (e-contact)—defined as “computer-mediated real-time interactions where members of different groups interact online” through virtual media with mental health services users [20]—has been used as a strategy for promoting awareness and reducing prejudice among ideologically different groups [21].”
From Innovative Technology–Based Interventions to Reduce Stigma Toward People With Mental Illness: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 44,563 · see citing works
(1954) · Cited by 15,935 · see citing works
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 8,964 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Without this awareness, the contact effects are unable to generalize beyond the immediate situation and transform into more positive attitudes toward the outgroup as a whole (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006).”
BackgroundSidanius, J., & Felicia Pratto, B. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175043 · Cited by 3,632 · see citing works
Hayes, A. F. (2018) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100 · Cited by 3,516 · see citing works
Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602 · Cited by 1,696 · see citing works
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x · Cited by 1,448 · see citing works
Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences
Herek, G. M. (1988) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224498809551476 · Cited by 1,274 · see citing works
The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-6444 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224007 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Sex Differences in Attitudes Toward Homosexual Persons, Behaviors, and Civil Rights A Meta-Analysis
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224002 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499309551707 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
SexualPrejudice and Gender: Do Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Differ?
Herek, G. M. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00164 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality: Structure and Implications for Prejudice
Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205276516 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective
LaMar, L., & Kite, M. E. (1998) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499809551932 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet
Amichai‐Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00037.x · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Gender-Role Variables and Attitudes Toward Homosexuality
Whitley, B. E. (2001) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1015640318045 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality
Lamke, L. K., & Bem, S. L. (1993) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352790 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6263 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Teens, technology and friendships
Lenhart, A., Smith, A. W., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., & Perrin, A. (2015) · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Gay Stereotypes: The Use of Sexual Orientation as a Cue for Gender-Related Attributes
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Whitley, B. E., & Ægisdóttir, S. (2000) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1007026016001 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499909552007 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Do Ideologically Intolerant People Benefit From Intergroup Contact?
Hodson, G. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411409025 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
The Effects of Contact on Sexual Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis
Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
The Health of Sexual Minorities
Meyer, I. H., & Northridge, M. E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Hodson, G., Harry, H., & Mitchell, A. (2008) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.558 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Louderback, L. A., & Whitley, B. E. (1997) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499709551882 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review
Bartos, S. E., Berger, I., & Hegarty, P. V. (2014) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.871625 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Markman, K. D., & Snyder, C. J. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206290213 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Vonofakou, C., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.804 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
White, F. A., & Abu-Rayya, H. M. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.007 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationCragun, R. T., & Sumerau, J. (2015) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.925534 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Collier, K. L., Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2012) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.12.010 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Cunningham, G. B., & Melton, E. N. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.648029 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Maunder, R. D., White, F. A., & Verrelli, S. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218794873 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationSOUTHERN (DIS)COMFORT: SEXUAL PREJUDICE AND CONTACT WITH GAY MEN AND LESBIANS IN THE SOUTH
Baunach, D. M., Burgess, E. O., & Muse, C. S. (2009) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732170903340893 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Improving Intergroup Relations in the Internet Age: A Critical Review
White, F. A., Harvey, L. J., & Abu‐Rayya, H. M. (2015) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000036 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving intergroup relations between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland via E‐contact
White, F. A., Turner, R. N., Verrelli, S., Harvey, L. J., & Hanna, J. R. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2515 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationWest, K., & Hewstone, M. (2012) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.614907 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
White, F. A., Abu‐Rayya, H. M., & Weitzel, C. (2013) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.002 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationMereish, E. H., & Poteat, V. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12284 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Multilevel Intergroup Contact and Antigay Prejudice (Explicit and Implicit)
MacInnis, C. C., Page‐Gould, E., & Hodson, G. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616671405 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9971-1 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The development of online cross-group relationships among university students
MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2014) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514548394 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Essentialist beliefs: Understanding contact with and attitudes towards lesbian and gay individuals
Lytle, A. E., Dyar, C., Levy, S. R., & London, B. E. (2016) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12154 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Abu‐Rayya, H. M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.010 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
White, F. A., Harvey, L. J., & Verrelli, S. (2015) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1111/ap.12108 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maunder, R. D., White, F. A., & Verrelli, S. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218794873 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationRodríguez-Rivas, M. E., Cangas, A. J., Cariola, L. A., Varela, J. J., & Valdebenito, S. (2022) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/35099 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- White, F. A., Verrelli, S., Maunder, R. D., & Kervinen, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- White, Fiona A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1179-1191
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2883277381
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- electronic contacts, contact hypothesis, sexual prejudice, intergroup anxiety, heterosexual men, prejudice reduction
- MeSH terms
- Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Heterosexuality, Young Adult, Text Messaging, Homophobia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review