The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries
Abstract
Attitudes toward premarital sex, teenage sex, extramarital sex, and homosexual sex in 24 countries were compared. Challenging the simplistic notion that a permissive‐nonpermissive dichotomy is sufficient to describe variations across countries, the hypothesis that there are distinctive sexual regimes with different moral standards depending on the type of sexuality was examined. Cluster analysis reveals that there are six groupings of nations which have similar moral standards. However, a variance decomposition analysis also shows that all countries included in the sample share relatively similar attitudes toward nonmarital sex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-4558 · Cited by 10,474
Everitt, B. J., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (1974) · Cited by 9,168
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
(1948) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/28.2.93 · Cited by 5,134
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society
Inglehart, R. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691186740 · Cited by 4,477
Culture shift in advanced industrial society
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1180 · Cited by 3,794
The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4802a · Cited by 2,890
The Social Organization of Sexuality. Sexual Practices in the United States
Giami, A., Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., Michaels, S., Michael, R. T., Laumann, E. O., & Kolata, G. (1997) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1534637 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
Schmitt, D. P. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000051 · Cited by 974
Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J.-H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., Moreira, E. D., Nicolosi, A., & Gingell, C. (2006) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3 · Cited by 626
Openly Gay Athletes: Contesting Hegemonic Masculinity in a Homophobic Environment
ANDERSON, E. (2002) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124302237892 · Cited by 373
INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATI0NSHIPS II: A SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01556.x · Cited by 348
Anderson, E. (2005) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2005.48.3.337 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-358
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2061226168
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 18.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224499809551953
- The paper
- Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.