The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empathy present and future
Abstract
The empathy concept has central significance for social and personality psychology and in many other domains, including neuroscience, clinical/abnormal psychology, and the health professions. However, the current diversity in conceptual and operational definitions, and the promiscuous use of the term "empathy," threaten the ability of researchers to advance the field. The present article provides a quantitative review and conceptual analysis of empathy definitions and usages by examining 393 studies published between 2001 and 2013, and 96 studies published in 2017. We document the prevalence and diversity of definitions, as well as inconsistencies between conceptual definitions and measurements employed. We discuss ways to refine the conceptualization and operationalization of the empathy construct, including for many purposes, bypassing the term empathy in favor of lower-level construct labels that more precisely describe what is actually being measured. In many cases we see no added theoretical or empirical value in applying the term empathy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mixed findings might be due to the jingle-jangle fallacy, whereby different definitional constructs of cognitive (or affective) empathy have been measured and conflated across different studies (38).”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.
Rogers, C. R. (1957) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045357 · Cited by 5,599 · cited 1×
“Distinguishing one’s own feelings from those of others Another potentially fruitful direction for research is to carry forward Carl Rogers’ notion of understanding another’s emotional experience while recognizing that it is not one’s own (Rogers, 1957).”
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 4,313
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 · Cited by 4,093
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 · Cited by 3,618
The functional architecture of human empathy
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004) · Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews · doi:10.1177/1534582304267187 · Cited by 3,407 · cited 4×
“…by inconsistent measurement approaches that compromise the ability to compare study designs and outcomes (Batson, 2009; Batson, Fultz, & Schoenrade, 1987; Cuff, Brown, Taylor, & Howat, 2016; Decety & Jackson, 2004; de Vignemont & Singer, 2006; Duan & Hill, 1996; Eisenberg & Miller, 1987).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Rudd (2006) · doi:10.1002/(issn)1097-4679 · Cited by 2,635
The altruism question: toward a social-psychological answer
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-4797 · Cited by 2,402
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1002/hbm.v34.12 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcpp.2001.42.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/jopy.1987.55.issue-1 · DOI
- Beckett R., 1994, Community-based treatment for sex offenders: An evaluation of seven treatment programmes
- Bramham J., 2002, Measure presented at the Rotman Research Institute 12th Annual Conference
- Cheon B. K., 2010, World Cultural Psychiatry Research Review, 5, 32
- Eysenck H., 1991, Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ): Adult
- Ickes W. J., 1997, Empathic accuracy
- Mehrabian A., 2000, Manual for the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES)
- Palmese F., 2013, TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20, 169
- 10.1111/acer.2017.41.issue-12 · DOI
- 10.1111/medu.2016.50.issue-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, B. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000732 · Cited by 247
The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Life
Depow, G. J., Francis, Z. L., & Inzlicht, M. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797621995202 · Cited by 211
The neuroscience of empathy and compassion in pro-social behavior
Stevens, F. L., & Taber, K. H. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107925 · Cited by 198
Sweet escape: The role of empathy in social media engagement with human versus virtual influencers
Mirowska, A., & Arsenyan, J. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103008 · Cited by 154
Artificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic?
Seitz, L. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100067 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Judith A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-06-18
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-243
- ISSN
- 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1183
- OpenAlex
- W2804479262
- Semantic Scholar
- 5885633e02245aa7d604009189865c194b763ff5
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- empathy, construct validity, measurement discrepancy, conceptual analysis
- MeSH terms
- Empathy, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Psychology, Social
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
