Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

pXRF Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from a Rural Spanish Household: Investigating Spanish-Pueblo Interactions in Seventeenth-Century New Mexico

Lindsay, Clint S.·2021·KIVA
DOI 10.1080/00231940.2021.1929715
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

pXRF analysis is used to identify the geographic origins of obsidian artifacts from a seventeenth-century New Mexico Spanish homestead. Socio-economic factors that may have influenced the presence of obsidian sources found at the site are then examined. The analysis provides a needed starting point to begin addressing questions concerning the incidence of obsidian and other flaked lithics recovered at early Spanish sites in the region and demonstrates the potential of obsidian to investigate broader historical archaeological and anthropological issues. I conclude that interpretations concerning the presence of lithic artifacts at Spanish sites need to move beyond functional explanations (e.g. lack of metal or material properties) and, instead, incorporate analysis with documentary evidence (when available) and larger social and economic contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00231940.2021.1929715

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Cobb Charles R., 2003, Stone Tool Traditions in the Contact Era
  2. Hughes Richard E., 1988, Texas Journal of Science, 40, 297
  3. Levine Frances E., 1992, Current Research on the Late Prehistory and Early History of New Mexico, 195
  4. Moore James L., 1992, Current Research on the Late Prehistory and Early History of New Mexico, 239
  5. Moore James L., 2001, Valencia: A Spanish Colonial and Mexican Period Site Along NM 47 in Valencia County, New Mexico, Archaeology Notes 267, 61
  6. Moore James L., 2004, Adaptations on the Anasazi and Spanish Frontiers: Excavations at Five Sites near Abiquiú, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, Archaeology Notes 187, 179
  7. Shackley M. Steven, 2020, Sources of Archaeological Obsidian in the Greater Southwest, The Northern New Mexico Region
  8. Shackley M. Steven, 2016, New Mexico Geology, 38, 52
  9. Snow David H., 1983, Hispanic Arts and Ethnohistory in the Southwest, 347
  10. Snow David H., 1992, Current Research on the Late Prehistory and Early History of New Mexico, 185
  11. Snow David H., 1994, Field Excavations at LA 20000,1980-1994
  12. Snow David H., 2009, Pottery Southwest, 28, 12
  13. Trigg Heather, 2004, Journal of the Southwest, 46, 223
  14. Trigg Heather, 2019, Final Report on the 2011-2017 Fieldwork at LA 20000

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Lindsay, C. S.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Venue
KIVA
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-07-08
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
486-508
ISSN
  • 0023-1940
  • 2051-6177
DOI
10.1080/00231940.2021.1929715
Cited by
1
References
41
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • BCS (1460297 and 1221564)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.