Cited by 91Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsHigher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Governance and Development

Swedish Doctoral Students' Experiences on their Journey towards a PhD: Obstacles and opportunities inside and outside the academic building

Appel, Monika L., Dahlgren, Lars G.·2003·Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Abstract

The overall aim of this article was to provide a picture of how doctoral students experience their working conditions on their journey towards a PhD. It is based mainly on an extensive pilot study and comprised both a qualitative and a quantitative section. The questionnaire was distributed to 278 students of both sexes at Umea § University in Sweden and the interview study comprises six female students. Interest in working at the university after receiving a PhD was about as great for women as it was for men, although, significantly fewer women continued. Different aspects of insecurity (financial insecurity, insecurity concerning one's own capacity, and insecurity concerning unwritten rules), difficulty in combining an academic career and a family, as well as negative experiences, were some of the obstacles mentioned. The opportunities described included intellectual development and a good chance for in-depth study in a special field. Several of the students also felt that their work involved something of importance. Many mentioned freedom, but often as a kind of Janus face (two-faced) freedom. They emphasised the advantages of freedom in doing research, but maintained at the same time that this freedom also meant that there was no clear dividing line between work and leisure time, and the women in particular felt under stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00313830308608

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few studies on PhD students suggest that stress may stem from various problems in the PhD process, such as problems concerning one's own learning, different aspects of insecurity, frequent evaluation, competitive atmosphere, supervision, relationships to faculty and peers, workload and work-life interface.

    “The few studies on PhD students suggest that stress may stem from various problems in the PhD process, such as problems concerning one's own learning, different aspects of insecurity (financial insecurity, insecurity concerning unwritten rules), frequent evaluation, competitive atmosphere, supervision, relationships to faculty and peers, workload and work-life interface (Appel and Dahlgren, 2003;K”

    From Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students (2017) · cites this paper as Appel and Dahlgren, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appel, M. L., & Dahlgren, L. G.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Published
2003-03
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
89-110
ISSN
  • 0031-3831 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1170
OpenAlex
W2124678288
Cited by
90
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Umeå Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
doctoral students, PhD journey, working conditions, gender differences, women in academia, financial insecurity, work-family balance, academic careers, work-life boundaries, stress, intellectual development, Umeå University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review