The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inequality of income, illiteracy and medical care as determinants of infant mortality in underdeveloped countries
Abstract
The primary purpose of the paper is to explain the differences in infant mortality rates for a sample of 46 underdeveloped countries. The study differs from earlier research in this field in the following respects. First, an attempt is made to include explanatory variables which have some bearing upon policy discussions. Secondly, considerable attention is devoted to the correct specification of the regression equation. Thirdly, an attempt is made to assess the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in (i) the composition of the sample and (ii) the observations on infant mortality. Finally, the data employed in the study appear to be somewhat less inaccurate than the figures which have been used elsewhere. The most satisfactory empirical results are obtained from a logarithmic model, in which the illiteracy rate for women (I), nurses per head of population (N), physicians per head (P), and the coefficient of variation (V) — a measure of inequality of incomes — appear as explanatory variables. The results for this model indicate that 73 per cent of the inter-country variation in the logarithm of the infant mortality rate (log D) can be explained by differences in log I, log N, log P and log V. It is worth emphasizing that the estimated parameters of this model are found to be fairly precise and robust, in contrast to the results obtained in earlier studies. An important finding which emerges from the econometric analysis is that the stage of economic development per se appears not to have a direct impact upon infant mortality. Another finding of considerable interest is that the results fail to uphold the hypothesis that high fertility is a cause ofhigh infant mortality It is also worth mentioning that infant mortality appears to be more sensitive to variations in the share of the exceptionally rich than to changes in the share of the comparatively poor. An examination of the policy implications of the model reveals that D may be expected to be very sensitive to changes in I, P and V. It is concluded that a rapid fall in the infant mortality rates of underdeveloped countries will not be achieved unless greater emphasis is placed upon reducing inequality of incomes and augmenting the social infrastructure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review
LYNCH, J., SMITH, G. D., HARPER, S., HILLEMEIER, M., ROSS, N., KAPLAN, G. A., & WOLFSON, M. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00302.x · Cited by 938
The impact of public spending on health: does money matter?
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00150-1 · Cited by 788
Effects of U.S. States’ Social Welfare Systems on Population Health
Kim, A., & Jennings, E. T. (2009) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00333.x · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Flegg, A. T.
- Venue
- Population Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 441-458
- ISSN
- 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4747
- OpenAlex
- W4312861570
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inequality of income, illiteracy and medical care as determinants of infant mortality in underdeveloped countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00324728.1982.10405597
- The paper
- Flegg, A. T. (1982). Inequality of income, illiteracy and medical care as determinants of infant mortality in underdeveloped countries. Population Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1982.10405597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.