The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective
Abstract
Bristow G. and Healy A. Regional resilience: an agency perspective, Regional Studies. This paper argues that in the nascent theorizing and empirical study of regional economic resilience, the role of human agency has been under-explored to date. In seeking to address this gap, the paper focuses on three key questions: why agency is important in resilience; how agents are organized in complex, regional economies and how they might act; and finally, what an agency perspective means for how resilience might be conceptualized and analysed empirically. It is argued that including the human factor in resilience thinking ultimately means that the role of place and context must assume greater significance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,002
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 1×
“By asking the same question in different ways, TVERSKY and KAHNEMAN (1981) have demonstrated how it is possible to receive answers that are both inconsistent and internally incoherent.”
BackgroundFoxman, D., & Bateson, G. (1973) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446833 · Cited by 7,225
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-0288 · Cited by 3,703
From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 · Cited by 3,496
Bateson, G. (2000) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001 · Cited by 3,401
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference
Meadows-Klue, D. (2004) · Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1057/palgrave.im.4340262 · Cited by 3,032
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1645 · Cited by 2,925
Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2008) · Cited by 2,793
Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity
Gallopín, G. C. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 · Cited by 2,723
Cited by
Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces
Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132519853870 · Cited by 587
Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.004 · Cited by 571
Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis
Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2018) · The Annals of Regional Science · doi:10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6 · Cited by 353
Self-citationSupply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimensional approach
Adobor, H., & McMullen, R. S. (2018) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-04-2017-0093 · Cited by 266
Regional economic resilience: towards a system approach
Sutton, J., & Arku, G. (2022) · Regional Studies, Regional Science · doi:10.1080/21681376.2022.2092418 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Bristow, G., & Healy, A.
- Venue
- Regional Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 923-935
- ISSN
- 0034-3404 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2082283665
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 30.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
- The paper
- Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2014). Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.