Regional economic resilience: towards a system approach
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a system approach to regional economic resilience. This approach argues that regional economies undergo, to varying degrees, changes to their economic system that result from the collective but uncoordinated action of economic actors in an attempt to be resilient to shocks. The system change, particularly focusing on changes to economies’ structure and function, which occurs during and following a shock, determines the type of resilience (i.e., engineering, ecological, evolutionary and transformative) employed by regions. The type of resilience employed can influence regions’ long-term growth trajectory and resilience to future shocks. This approach advances the examination of regions’ resilience capacity, which has largely been ignored in empirical studies of resilience. In doing so, the approach developed in this paper is heuristic rather than deterministic, with the latter characterizing the bulk of the literature. A greater investigation into system change can provide a holistic understanding of resilience. This approach has many advantages, such as developing greater insight into resilience, applying a heuristic method rather than deterministic and examining regions’ adaptive capacity. To advance the system approach, this paper provides greater conceptual clarity of resilience, highlighting the notions conceptual parameters and rethinking the oppositional context in which the four main types of resilience are commonly discussed. Specifically, it conceptualizes the main types of resilience as complementary rather than oppositional. The overall contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it establishes a greater conceptual framework of resilience. Second, it develops an approach in which regions’ adaptive capacity can be investigated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institutional trust and quality of governance significantly contribute to the effectiveness of crisis management systems across countries.
“Further studies show that institutional trust and quality of governance significantly contribute to the determination of the effectiveness of crisis management systems in various countries (Sutton & Arku, 2022).”
From The Interactions Between Political Economy and Global Financial Crises: A Case Study of the 2008 Global Recession (2026) · cites this paper as Sutton & Arku, 2022
The available passages under “Regional Economic Resilience: Developing Conceptual Clarity” and “Towards a System Approach” show section headings, not findings about crisis management across countries. Searches for institutional trust, quality of governance, and crisis management returned no passage addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. P. (2004) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-00650-090205 · Cited by 7,821 · see citing works
Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzig, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Schultz, L. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01530-110113 · Cited by 1,374 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hochmair, H. H., Wang, X., & Hamid, M. B. A. (2026) · International Academic Journal of Economics · doi:10.71086/iaje/v13i1/iaje1305
- Authors
- Sutton, J., & Arku, G.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sutton, Jesse
- Venue
- Regional Studies, Regional Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 497-512
- ISSN
- 2168-1376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285394460
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-02-09)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Regional Studies Regional Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional resilience and development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
- Keywords
- regional economic resilience, systems approach, system change, economic shocks, engineering resilience, ecosystem resilience, evolutionary resilience, transformative resilience, adaptive capacity, resilience capacity, regional economic structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review