Restrictive Language Education Policies and Emergent Bilingual Youth: A Perfect Storm With Imperfect Outcomes
Abstract
This article focuses on 2 recent policy changes that have resulted in increased English-only instruction in US schools, with detrimental effects for emergent bilinguals (also known as English language learners): (a) statewide antibilingual education mandates in California, Arizona, and Massachusetts; and (b) the federal passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The causal link between antibilingual education state policies and English-only instruction is transparent, yet NCLB likewise restricts the use of languages other than English in instruction. To support this argument, I share research recently conducted in New York City that demonstrates how the accountability requirements of NCLB have resulted in the dismantling of numerous bilingual education programs. Although restrictive language education policies have been adopted in US schools in the name of improving academic outcomes for emergent bilinguals, this article shares data highlighting how these policies have failed to deliver on their promises, and concludes with implications for future policies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
English-only instruction is a common occurrence in states with significant numbers of ELLs.
“With English-only instruction as a common occurrence in states with significant numbers of ELLs (Menken, 2013), we approached our instructional framework with that in mind.”
From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Menken, 2013
States often discourage bilingual instruction preferring English-only.
“While bilingual instruction is more often supported by research studies (Adetula, 1990; Moschkovich, 2007; see also Rolstad, Mahoney, & Glass, 2005 for a meta-analysis), states often discourage bilingual instruction preferring English-only (Guo & Koretz, 2013; Menken, 2013; Menken & Solorza, 2014).”
From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Menken, 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vogel, S., & García, O. (2018) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccy034 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Menken, K., & Sánchez, M. T. (2019) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.513 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
“schooling has typically remained steadfast in its monolingual orientations to language education policy and emergent bilingual students (G andara & Hopkins, 2010; Garc ıa, 2009; Menken, 2013; Wiley, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationEnglish Learners in K–12 Mathematics Education: A Review of the Literature
de Araujo, Z., Roberts, S. A., Willey, C., & Zahner, W. C. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318798093 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“For example, decades of research reveal that U.S. schools have served English learners1 (ELs) poorly as evidenced by assessment scores, course-taking patterns, and measures of educational attainment such as high school graduation rates (Gándara & Contreras, 2009; Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundPrincipals as linchpins in bilingual education: the need for prepared school leaders
Menken, K., & Solorza, C. (2015) · doi:10.1080/13670050.2014.937390 · Cited by 65
Self-citationRacial and Language Microaggressions in the School Ecology
Steketee, A., Williams, M. T., Valencia, B. T., Printz, D. M. B., & Hooper, L. M. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691621995740 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“education has maintained a monolingual orientation in language policy and practice (Menken, 2013; Menken & Sánchez, 2019).”
BackgroundPowell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Tran, L. M. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1677538 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“The mathematics achievement gap between ELs and non-ELs starts early, doubles from fourth to eighth grade, and leads to detrimental effects in high school and beyond, including increased risk for school failure, lower graduation rates, and unemployment (Menken, 2013; NCES, 2017; Randel, Moore, & Blair, 2008; Reardon &…”
BackgroundConnecting the Present to the Past
Baker, D. L., Basaraba, D. L., & Polanco, P. (2016) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x16660691 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Thus, many schools decided to eliminate their bilingual programs in the belief that EO instruction was the best way to ensure that ELs would make yearly progress (Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundChoi, T., & Poudel, P. P. (2024) · System (Linköping) · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103223 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“This practice shows that, officially, these schools adopted ‘restrictive ’ language policies (Darder, 2014; Kan & Adamson, 2009; Menken, 2013), guided by standard language ideologies.”
Collins, B. A., Sánchez, M. T., & España, C. (2019) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2019.1610354 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“…that silenced a part of their identities, hindering their development as bilingual beings, are rooted in schooling practices, societal perceptions of bilingualism and the concern that families have for their children’s educational experiences (Brooks 2017; Guerrero and Guerrero 2008; Menken 2013).”
BackgroundShi, L., & Rolstad, K. (2022) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3204 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flores, N., & Lewis, M. C. (2022) · Equity & Excellence in Education · doi:10.1080/10665684.2022.2047408 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Within the U.S. context, critical language policy has typically been taken up in ways that examine restrictive language policies that frame language diversity as a threat and seek to impose English-only policies (Crawford, 2000; Menken, 2013; Olivos & Ochoa, 2008).”
BackgroundGiambo, D. A., & Szécsi, T. (2015) · The Open Communication Journal · doi:10.2174/1874916x01509010056 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“…Rumberger, 2009), (2) the sole and dominant focus on the development of English proficiency, which can be a result of high-stakes testing pressures (Menken, 2013; Menken & Solorza, 2014), and (3) teachers and district professionals' misconception of the value of being bilingual and biliterate (Cho…”
Moore Johnson, E. (2019) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201930036 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cho, H., & Johnson, P. E. (2020) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2020.1821625 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Menken, K., & Avni, S. (2017) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190517000149 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…Arizona, and Massachusetts affected public sentiment in New York, and (b) federal education legislation, No Child Left Behind (2002), repealed the Bilingual Education Act (1968) and required school accountability based on high-stakes testing in English (Menken, 2013; Menken & Solorza, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Distinctly American Opportunity
Smith, P. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732216644451 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Already, the United States has taken steps that address linguistic diversity in enacting policies focused on bilingual learners (see Abedi, 2004; Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundCommunicating Care Across Culture and Language
Dexter, A. L., Lavigne, A. L., & de la Garza, T. O. (2016) · Humanity & Society · doi:10.1177/0160597616643882 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“U.S. schools that generally strip Latin@ students of their cultural and linguistic heritage (Garza and Crawford 2005; Menken 2013; Valenzuela 1999) may thereby create obstacles for students meaningfully relating to learning in schools.”
BackgroundPolanco, P., & de Baker, D. L. (2018) · Athens Journal of Education · doi:10.30958/aje.5-4-5 · Cited by 10
“While today various programs are offering bilingual education to maintain the L1, the goal of federal education policy remains the same: use the L1 as a tool to help ELs transition into English so that they can effectively participate in the job market (Menken, 2013; Mitchell, 2016).”
Background50(0) Years Out and Counting: Native American Language Education and the Four Rs
McCarty, T. L., Nicholas, S. E., & Wyman, L. (2015) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2015.1091267 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Multiple principals were acting as “everyday policy makers,” undermining Yup’ik programs through resource distribution and programming (see Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundCallahan, R. M., Jiang, L., & Nuñez, A. (2022) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/08959048221103802 · Cited by 9
“Research evidence indicates that the quality and caliber of these services depend largely on state-level language policies that can enhance or constrain access to EL-specific instructional supports and coursework (Gándara & Hopkins, 2010; Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundShohamy, E., & Menken, K. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118533406.ch15 · Cited by 9
Self-citationGuiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs
Kurz, T. L., Gómez, C., & Jimenez-Silva, M. (2017) · Journal of Urban Mathematics Education · doi:10.21423/jume-v10i1a291 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Raemdonck, M. V., Tyler, R., van Avermaet, P., & Vantieghem, W. (2023) · Current Issues in Language Planning · doi:10.1080/14664208.2023.2283654 · Cited by 8
“These results align with Heineke et al. (2015) work in the United States of America, which found that student-teachers are unfamiliar with the local LP.”
BackgroundMethodExamining ESL and bilingual teachers’ agency after NCLB: expanding the ecological perspective
Fu, Y., & Weng, Z.-J. (2023) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2023.2201090 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The high-stakes testing and accountability system, mandated by NCLB and largely reinforced by ESSA, drives statelevel regulations, and restricts local policies on school curriculum and program design, which led to the dismantling of numerous bilingual programs and popular adoption of monolingual ideology and practices…”
BackgroundMancilla‐Martinez, J., Hwang, J. K., Oh, M. H., & Pokowitz, E. L. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00056 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This trend may reflect current policies in place that advocate for English-only instruction, beginning at the preschool level (Gándara & Hopkins, 2010; Menken, 2013), and that limit formal instruction in the home language (Spanish, in this case), particularly in new destination states.”
BackgroundCatalano, T., Kiramba, L. K., & Viesca, K. M. (2020) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2020.1738287 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The belief of the teacher reported by Santiago’s mom is not uncommon, and much research has previously reported the erroneous perception that speaking a different language at home causes problems for learning in school (Briscoe, 2014; Menken, 2013; Shim, 2014).”
BackgroundA corpus-driven exploration of U.S. language planning and language ideology from 2013 to 2018
Diaz, B. A., & Hall, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.19108.dia · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Shohamy, E. (2014) · The Power of Tests · doi:10.4324/9781315837970-30 · Cited by 6
Developing health literacy events: a case study of teachers designing health curricula
Rumenapp, J. C., Troiano, B., Adams, M., Moya, J., Lawrence, E. K., & Razfar, A. (2023) · Health Education Journal · doi:10.1177/00178969231180371 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“However, the activity operated with a linguistically restrictive view of bilingualism (Menken, 2013), one that relied on languages being separated in students’ practice.”
BackgroundSánchez, M. T., Menken, K., & Pappas, L. N. (2021) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2021.2015936 · Cited by 5
“, the vast majority of students from immigrant backgrounds receive their schooling monolingually in English as a result of language education policies that restrict the use of their home languages in schools (Baker & Wright, 2017; García, 2009; García & Sung, 2018; Menken, 2013) such that, by the third generation, imm…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKitchen, R., Castellón, L. B., Matute, K., & Mosqueda, E. (2024) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2024.2391967 · Cited by 3
“It is also the case that MLs face additional challenges that may inhibit their academic success, such as restrictive language policies that promote English-only instruction (Menken, 2013) and racism and xenophobia (Kumi-Yeboah & Smith, 2017).”
Holtz, E., & Young, J. L. (2024) · Bilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/15235882.2023.2296425 · Cited by 3
“More states are adopting language policies as they move to meet the requirements of ESSA and monitor emergent bilingual progress toward English proficiency (Linquanti & Cook, 2015; Menken, 2013; Solórzano, 2008).”
BackgroundFlores, N., & Lewis, M. C. (2023) · Equity & Excellence in Education · doi:10.1080/10665684.2023.2236116 · Cited by 3
“Within the U.S. context, critical language policy has typically been taken up in ways that examine restrictive language policies that frame language diversity as a threat and seek to impose English-Only policies (Crawford, 2000; Menken, 2013; Olivos & Ochoa, 2008).”
Ebsworth, M. E., Marsh, L., Deschene, D., & Cai, C. (2022) · NABE Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/26390043.2021.2015270 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, as a practical matter, these policies are implemented inconsistently and placement issues for newly arrived EBs persist (Goodman, 2018; V. L. Marsh, 2018; Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundBridges across languages and cultures: Narratives of long-term English learners
Csorvasi, V., & Colby, S. (2021) · NABE Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/26390043.2021.1986360 · Cited by 2
“Unlike Menken’s (2013) study with LTELs, in which students expressed offense with being labeled as English language learners, the students in this”
16 The drivers of home language maintenance and development in indigenous communities
Mayer, E., Sánchez, L., Camacho, J., & Alzza, C. R. (2020) · Handbook of Home Language Maintenance and Development · doi:10.1515/9781501510175-016 · Cited by 2
“The United States has no official language, although several states have implemented English-only legislation at the state level which reflects the languageas-planning perspective (Menken 2013).”
BackgroundPorras, D. A. (2019) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2019.1598130 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“1Following Bale (2015), García (2009), and Menken (2013), I have adopted the term emergent bilingual to describe students who come from homes where a language other than English is spoken and, by adding English to the skills and knowledge they already possess, are becoming bi/multilingual.”
BackgroundChallenges for language education and policy
Xeni, E. (2015) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1100390 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bibliometric Review of Bilingual Education Between 1983 and 2023 (40 Years)
Hsieh, C.-C., Khau, A. H., & Shen, J.-Y. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251357553 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Price, K. E. (2022) · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · doi:10.1177/0145482x221105506 · Cited by 1
“What they all have in common is that they speak a first language other than English and are entering school systems that prioritize English-only education (Bondy, 2016; Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundDelavan, G., Freire, J. A., & Menken, K. (2021) · Language Policy · doi:10.1007/s10993-021-09597-x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Carrying forward DelgadoLarocco’s (1998) line of work, inequities in educators’ attention within two-way programs was a central gentrification theme during the 2000s, with more detailed empirical studies that found evidence to support the critique.”
Self-citationSnyder, R. (2019) · Language Policy · doi:10.1007/s10993-019-09509-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Multilingual Learners and Possibilities for Agency
Vaughn, M., Lammert, C., Carrizales, D., & Arlington, K. C. (2025) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2025.2535921
“In this way, as outlined by Menken (2013), proponents of English-only instruction have argued that providing instruction in a single language contributes to a more cohesive U.S. culture.”
InfluentialThe Digital Gatekeepers: How Texas District Websites Shape Equitable Access for Emergent Bilinguals
Holtz, E., Edosomwan, K., & Worley, C. (2024) · Journal of Latinos & Education · doi:10.1080/15348431.2024.2444946
“Meanwhile, language and/or bilingual programs do not meet the needs of Spanish-speaking students with restrictive language policies (Menken, 2013).”
The restrictive consequences of promoting tolerance
Pagán, X. R., & Dunn, M. S. (2024) · NABE Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/26390043.2024.2413968
“Perhaps most alarming, while the national average of MLE graduation rates continued to increase from 2012–2016, The State’s average MLE graduation rates actually decreased from 57% (2012–2013) to 47.5% (2015–2016; USDE, 2020).”
InfluentialWilley, C., & Kigamwa, J. (2018) · Dual Language Research and Practice Journal · doi:10.21423/dlrpj-v1.a6
Restrictive Language Policy in Practice: English Learners in Arizona, by Heineke, A.
Collier, J.-K. (2018) · doi:10.1080/15348458.2018.1464922
“Studies in this field typically zoom in on a single group of actors within the language policy arena and tend to emphasize the evaluation of policies alongside the authoritative role of policymakers in the creation of language policy (Arias & Wiley, 2013; Menken, 2013; Menken & Solorza, 2014).”
BackgroundRacines, D. (2014) · doi:10.1108/s1479-366020150000024032
“School administrators consistently identify the accountability pressures of NCLB and specifically testing in English as the main factor in their decision to eliminate bilingual programs (Menken, 2013).”
BackgroundThe Context of Schooling for Early Learners of Spanish in the United States
Coady, M. R., Kim, H., & Marichal, N. V. (2021) · Early Language Learning Policy in the 21st Century · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76251-3_11
Gastelum, I. E. (2020) · doi:10.26716/redlands/doctor/2020.1
“Educators, as well as parents, community members, and legislators, must take steps to become knowledgeable with the research supporting bilingualism so that they can in turn advocate for those ELLs whose educational needs are not always met (Menken, 2013).”
Background
- Authors
- Menken, K.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Menken, Kate
- ORCID
- Menken, Kate
- Venue
- Theory Into Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 160-168
- ISSN
- 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-0421
- OpenAlex
- W2033360157
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 24.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
- Keywords
- language education policy, English-only instruction, emergent bilinguals, English language learners, No Child Left Behind Act, school accountability, California, Arizona, Massachusetts, New York City
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review