Cited by 22EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningMultilingual Education and PolicySecond Language Learning and Teaching

Choosing and Using Interactional Scaffolds: How Teachers’ Moment-to-Moment Supports Can Generate and Sustain Emergent Bilinguals’ Engagement with Challenging English Texts

Moore Johnson, Erika·2019·Research in the Teaching of English

Abstract

Preview this article: Choosing and Using Interactional Scaffolds: How Teachers' Moment-to-Moment Supports Can Generate and Sustain Emergent Bilinguals' Engagement with Challenging English Texts, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/rte/53/3/researchintheteachingofenglish30036-1.gif

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58680/rte201930036

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students may not develop a deeper comprehension ability through IRE/IRF, which can be achieved through opportunities for multiple interpretations of text information.

    “Students may not develop a deeper comprehension ability, which can be achieved through opportunities for multiple interpretations of text information (Johnson 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore Johnson, E.
Affiliations
Stanford University
Venue
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
245-269
ISSN
  • 0034-527X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2348
OpenAlex
W2955388475
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in the Teaching of English (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
emergent bilinguals, teacher support, challenging texts, student engagement, second language learners, reading instruction, classroom discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review