The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distributional Structure
Abstract
For the purposes of the present discussion, the term structure will be used in the following non-rigorous sense: A set of phonemes or a set of data is structured in respect to some feature, to the extent that we can form in terms of that feature some organized system of statements which describes the members of the set and their interrelations (at least up to some limit of complexity). In this sense, language can be structured in respect to various independent features. And whether it is structured (to more than a trivial extent) in respect to, say, regular historical change, social intercourse, meaning, or distribution - or to what extent it is structured in any of these respects - is a matter decidable by investigation. Here we will discuss how each language can be described in terms of a distributional structure, i.e. in terms of the occurrence of parts (ultimately sounds) relative to other parts, and how this description is complete without intrusion of other features such as history or meaning. It goes without saying that other studies of language - historical, psychological, etc.-are also possible, both in relation to distributional structure and independently of it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In LLMs, semantic similarity is determined based on distribution across contexts: words that appear in similar contexts are mapped to nearby vectors.”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“There is a deep connection between the way in which LLMs learn embeddings from linguistic corpora, and the old idea from structural linguistics according to which word meaning can be inferred from the contexts in which they appear, known as the distributional hypothesis (Firth, 1957;Harris, 1954).”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“This result mirrors a relentless trend in DL for various domains, where learned features ultimately outperform and displace long-used expert features, such as the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [8] and Bag-of-words [9].”
From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,015
Laks, B. (2008) · Journal of French Language Studies · doi:10.1017/s0959269507003146 · Cited by 82
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Schlötterer, J., Seifert, C., Granitzer, M., Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A. M., & Weippl, E. R. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66808-6 · Cited by 69
Markowitz, D. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.588823 · Cited by 69
Roos, M. W. M., & Reccius, M. (2023) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12576 · Cited by 112
Semantic Structure in Deep Learning
Pavlick, E. (2021) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-122924 · Cited by 82
A semantics-based measure of emoji similarity
Wijeratne, S., Balasuriya, L., Sheth, A., & Doran, D. (2017) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3106426.3106490 · Cited by 68
Studying the Dark Triad of Personality through Twitter Behavior
Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., Carpenter, J. M., Giorgi, S., & Ungar, L. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2983323.2983822 · Cited by 74
A Hierarchical Model for Clustering and Categorising Documents
Gaussier, É., Goutte, C., Popat, K., & Chen, F. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45886-7_16 · Cited by 68
Collaborative filtering embeddings for memory-based recommender systems
Valcarce, D., Landin, A., Parapar, J., & Barreiro, Á. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.020 · Cited by 67
Voting experts: An unsupervised algorithm for segmenting sequences
Cohen, P. R., Adams, N. M., & Heeringa, B. (2007) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2007-11603 · Cited by 67
Ontologizing semantic relations
Marco Pennacchiotti, B., & Pantel, P. (2006) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220275 · Cited by 67
Domain and Function: A Dual-Space Model of Semantic Relations and Compositions
Turney, P. D. (2012) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.3640 · Cited by 66
Corpus-level Fine-grained Entity Typing Using Contextual Information
Yaghoobzadeh, Y., & Schütze, H. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1083 · Cited by 75
Adversarial Attribute-Text Embedding for Person Search With Natural Language Query
Zha, Z.-J., Liu, J., Chen, D., & Wu, F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2020.2972168 · Cited by 63
Just-in-time software vulnerability detection: Are we there yet?
Lomio, F., Iannone, E., Lucia, A. D., Palomba, F., & Lenarduzzi, V. (2022) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.111283 · Cited by 70
Neural dynamics of semantic composition
Lyu, B., Choi, H., Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., Clarke, A., Randall, B., & TYLER, L. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1903402116 · Cited by 66
Measuring Word Significance using Distributed Representations of WordsPreprint
Schakel, A. M. J., & Wilson, B. J. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1508.02297 · Cited by 66
Seana Coulson, A. (2007) · Human cognitive processing · doi:10.1075/hcp.18.25cou · Cited by 65
Chung, K. S. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0011 · Cited by 65
Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method
Scholz, R. W., Czichos, R., Parycek, P., & Lampoltshammer, T. J. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.020 · Cited by 71
Transformer-Based Deep Neural Language Modeling for Construct-Specific Automatic Item Generation
Hommel, B. E., Wollang, F.-J., Kotova, V., Zacher, H., & Schmukle, S. C. (2021) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-021-09823-9 · Cited by 75
Zhou, J., Ye, Z., Zhang, S., Zhao, G., Han, N., & Yang, T. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35945 · Cited by 89
Efficient autism spectrum disorder prediction with eye movement: A machine learning framework
Liu, W., Yu, X., Raj, B., Yi, L., Zou, X., & Li, M. (2015) · International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2015.7344638 · Cited by 65
Bank distress in the news: Describing events through deep learning
Rönnqvist, S., & Sarlin, P. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.110 · Cited by 68
Natural Language Requirements Processing: A 4D Vision
Ferrari, A., Dell’Orletta⋄, F., Esuli, A., Gervasi, V., & Gnesi, S. (2017) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2017.4121207 · Cited by 65
Approximate Semantic Matching of Events for the Internet of Things
Hasan, S., & Curry, E. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · doi:10.1145/2633684 · Cited by 64
Random Walks and Neural Network Language Models on Knowledge Bases
Goikoetxea, J., Soroa, A., & Agirre, E. (2015) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1165 · Cited by 71
Forecasting container freight rates using the Prophet forecasting method
Saeed, N., Nguyen, S., Cullinane, K., Gekara, V. O., & Chhetri, P. (2023) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.012 · Cited by 68
Aceves, P., & Evans, J. A. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.1686 · Cited by 74
Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing
Wiriyathammabhum, P., Summers-Stay, D. A., Fermuller, C. M., & Aloimonos, Y. (2016) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3009906 · Cited by 69
Abductive Reasoning with a Large Knowledge Base for Discourse Processing
Ovchinnikova, E., Montazeri, N., Alexandrov, T., Hobbs, J. R., McCord, M. C., & Mulkar-Mehta, R. (2013) · Text, speech and language technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7284-7_7 · Cited by 63
COVID-19 and Green Housing: A Review of Relevant Literature
Kaklauskas, A., Lepkova, N., Raslanas, S., Vetloviene, I., Milevicius, V., & Sepliakov, J. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14082072 · Cited by 68
Beyond word embeddings: A survey
Incitti, F., Urli, F., & Snidaro, L. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.024 · Cited by 74
Text Mining the History of Medicine
Thompson, P., Batista-Navarro, R., Kontonatsios, G., Carter, J., Toon, E., McNaught, J., Timmermann, C., Worboys, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144717 · Cited by 63
Comparison of automatic summarisation methods for clinical free text notes
Moen, H., Peltonen, L., Heimonen, J., Airola, A., Pahikkala, T., Salakoski, T., & Salanterä, S. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2016.01.003 · Cited by 65
Inferring Affective Meanings of Words from Word Embedding
Li, M., Lu, Q., Long, Y., & Gui, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2723012 · Cited by 68
Inducing ontological co-occurrence vectors
Pantel, P. (2005) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/1219840.1219856 · Cited by 63
Environmental Determinants of Lexical Processing Effort
McDonald, S. A. (2000) · ERA · Cited by 63
Text Analysis for Psychology: Methods, Principles, and PracticesPreprint
Kennedy, B., Ashokkumar, A., Boyd, R. L., & Dehghani, M. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/h2b8t · Cited by 62
Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice
Goyens, M., Ducos, J., Vigneron, F., & Fourneau, I. (2013) · Terminology and lexicography research and practice · doi:10.1075/tlrp · Cited by 63
The automatic identification of lexical variation between language varieties
Peirsman, Y., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D. (2010) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324910000161 · Cited by 62
Correlation analysis and text classification of chemical accident cases based on word embedding
Jing, S., Liu, X., Gong, X., Tang, Y., Xiong, G., Liu, S., Xiang, S., & Bi, R. (2021) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.12.038 · Cited by 62
Theoretical Foundations and Limits of Word Embeddings: What Types of Meaning can They Capture?
Arseniev‐Koehler, A. (2022) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/00491241221140142 · Cited by 75
Identifying bilingual Multi-Word Expressions for Statistical Machine Translation
Bouamor, D., Semmar, N., & Zweigenbaum, P. (2012) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/3jrrxjnqy96m · Cited by 62
Medical Concept Embedding with Time-Aware Attention
Cai, X., Gao, J., Ngiam, K. Y., Ooi, B. C., Zhang, Y., & Yuan, X. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/554 · Cited by 73
A new semantic relatedness measurement using WordNet features
Taieb, M. A. H., Aouicha, M. B., & Hamadou, A. B. (2013) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-013-0672-4 · Cited by 61
Coevolution of learning and data-acquisition mechanisms: a model for cognitive evolution
Lotem, A., & Halpern, J. Y. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0213 · Cited by 62
Marelli, M., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.026 · Cited by 61
Syntax-Aware Multi-Sense Word Embeddings for Deep Compositional Models of Meaning
Cheng, J., & Kartsaklis, D. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1177 · Cited by 70
Kolodny, O., Edelman, S., & Lotem, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0353 · Cited by 60
Trade-offs between machine learning and deep learning for mental illness detection on social media
Ding, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Shen, X., Tian, Y., & Dai, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99167-6 · Cited by 72
Bringing Machine Learning and Compositional Semantics Together
Liang, P., & Potts, C. (2015) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125312 · Cited by 59
Callison-Burch, C. (2007) · Cited by 60
Separated by an Un-common Language: Towards Judgment Language Informed Vector Space ModelingPreprint
Leviant, I., & Reichart, R. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1508.00106 · Cited by 60
Combating Crowdsourced Review Manipulators: A Neighborhood-Based Approach
Kaghazgaran, P., Caverlee, J., & Squicciarini, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159726 · Cited by 59
Multi-Modal Models for Concrete and Abstract Concept Meaning
Hill, F., Reichart, R., & Korhonen, A. (2014) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00183 · Cited by 58
Padraic Monaghan, B., & Rowland, C. F. (2016) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12221 · Cited by 61
DeepSyslog: Deep Anomaly Detection on Syslog Using Sentence Embedding and Metadata
Zhou, J., Qian, Y., Zou, Q., Liu, P., & Xiang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3201379 · Cited by 64
Ferrari, A., Donati, B., & Gnesi, S. (2017) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew.2017.20 · Cited by 59
Lucy, L., & Gauthier, J. (2017) · RoboNLP@ACL · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-2810 · Cited by 68
Learning Cross-lingual Word Embeddings via Matrix Co-factorization
Shi, T., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., & Sun, M. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-2093 · Cited by 58
Sémantique distributionnelle en linguistique de corpus
Heylen, K., & Bertels, A. (2016) · Langages · doi:10.3917/lang.201.0051 · Cited by 58
A Hybrid Document Feature Extraction Method Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation and Word2Vec
Wang, Z., Ma, L., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace · doi:10.1109/dsc.2016.110 · Cited by 58
Temporal Word Analogies: Identifying Lexical Replacement with Diachronic Word Embeddings
Szymanski, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2071 · Cited by 58
The Digital Middle Ages: An Introduction
Birnbaum, D. J., Bonde, S., & Kestemont, M. (2017) · Speculum · doi:10.1086/694236 · Cited by 58
Lutz, B., Pröllochs, N., & Neumann, D. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.010 · Cited by 70
Contextual Text Understanding in Distributional Semantic Space
Cheng, J., Wang, Z., Wen, J.-R., Yan, J., & Chen, Z. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2806416.2806517 · Cited by 58
Vulić, I., Smet, W. D., & Moens, M. (2012) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-012-9200-5 · Cited by 58
Automatic generation of multiple choice questions using dependency-based semantic relations
Afzal, N., & Mitkov, R. (2013) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-013-1141-4 · Cited by 64
Structured Learning for Taxonomy Induction with Belief Propagation
Bansal, M., Burkett, D., de Melo, G., & Klein, D. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1098 · Cited by 58
A novel sentiment aware dictionary for multi-domain sentiment classification
Jha, V., Savitha, R., Shenoy, P. D., Venugopal, K. R., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2017) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.10.015 · Cited by 58
Foundations for Near-Term Quantum Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Coecke, B., de Felice, G., Meichanetzidis, K., & Toumi, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03755 · Cited by 136
The social distributional hypothesis: a pragmatic proxy for homophily in online social networks
Mitzlaff, F., Atzmueller, M., Andreas Hotho, A., & Gerd Stumme, A. (2014) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-014-0216-2 · Cited by 57
Learning auxiliary fronting with grammatical inference
Clark, A., & Eyraud, R. (2006) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.3115/1596276.1596300 · Cited by 57
A Tensor-based Factorization Model of Semantic Compositionality
de Cruys, T. V., Umr, I., Poibeau, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013) · Cited by 57
Luo, S., & He, S. Y. (2021) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.018 · Cited by 62
Analyzing user perspectives on mobile app privacy at scale
Nema, P., Anthonysamy, P., Taft, N., & Peddinti, S. T. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510079 · Cited by 62
Reducing semantic drift with bagging and distributional similarity
McIntosh, T., & Curran, J. R. (2009) · doi:10.3115/1687878.1687935 · Cited by 57
Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles without Feature Engineering
Dang, Q.-V., & Ignat, C. (2016) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/2910896.2910917 · Cited by 57
Zlatintsi, A., Koutras, P., Evangelopoulos, G., Malandrakis, N., Efthymiou, N., Pastra, K., Potamianos, A., & Maragos, P. A. (2017) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1186/s13640-017-0194-1 · Cited by 58
Huebner, P. A., & Willits, J. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00133 · Cited by 64
Scaling Word2Vec on Big Corpus
Li, B., Валентинович, Д. А., Guo, Y., Liu, T., Matsuoka, S., & Du, X. (2019) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-019-0096-6 · Cited by 60
Experiments with Three Approaches to Recognizing Lexical EntailmentPreprint
Turney, P. D., & Mohammad, S. M. (2014) · Cited by 57
Revisiting Mahalanobis Distance for Transformer-Based Out-of-Domain Detection
Podolskiy, A., Lipin, D., Bout, A., Artemova, E., & Piontkovskaya, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i15.17612 · Cited by 66
A Brief Survey of Word Embedding and Its Recent Development
Jiao, Q., & Zhang, S. (2021) · IEEE Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC) · doi:10.1109/iaeac50856.2021.9390956 · Cited by 67
A multimodal grammar of artificial intelligence: Measuring the gains and losses in generative AI
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2023) · Multimodality & Society · doi:10.1177/26349795231221699 · Cited by 73
Petten, C. K. V. (2014) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.10.012 · Cited by 58
Vector representation of words for sentiment analysis using GloVe
Sharma, Y., Agrawal, G., Jain, P., & Kumar, T. (2017) · International Conference on Intelligent Communication and Computational Techniques (ICCT) · doi:10.1109/intelcct.2017.8324059 · Cited by 56
Characterizing Defective Configuration Scripts Used for Continuous Deployment
Rahman, A., & Williams, L. A. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST) · doi:10.1109/icst.2018.00014 · Cited by 59
Predicting natural language descriptions of mono-molecular odorants
Gutiérrez, E. D., Dhurandhar, A., Keller, A., Meyer, P., & Cecchi, G. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07439-9 · Cited by 58
An attention-gated convolutional neural network for sentence classification
Liu, Y., Ji, L., Huang, R., Ming, T., Gao, C., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-184311 · Cited by 56
Creutz, M. (2006) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 56
Supersense Embeddings: A Unified Model for Supersense Interpretation, Prediction, and Utilization
Flek, L., & Gurevych, I. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1191 · Cited by 56
The Emotions of Abstract Words: A Distributional Semantic Analysis
Lenci, A., Lebani, G. E., & Passaro, L. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12335 · Cited by 55
Causal relationship extraction from biomedical text using deep neural models: A comprehensive survey
Akkasi, A., & Moens, M.-F. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103820 · Cited by 55
LEDIR: An Unsupervised Algorithm for Learning Directionality of Inference Rules
Bhagat, R., Pantel, P., & Hovy, E. H. (2007) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · Cited by 55
Sparse Self-Attention LSTM for Sentiment Lexicon Construction
Deng, D., Jing, L., Yu, J. J., & Sun, S. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2019.2933326 · Cited by 59
Stereotypical Gender Associations in Language Have Decreased Over Time
Jones, J. J., Amin, M. R., Kim, J., & Skiena, S. (2019) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v7.a1 · Cited by 55
Formal Distributional Semantics: Introduction to the Special Issue
Boleda, G., & Herbelot, A. (2016) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00261 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, Z. S.
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Zellig S.
- Venue
- WORD
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1954-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 146-162
- ISSN
- 0043-7956 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2882319491
- Cited by
- 4,807
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 181 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 371 · 2022: 365 · 2021: 428 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 474 · 2018: 373 · 2017: 324 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 242 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- WORD (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- phonemes, phonological features, phonological description, sound distribution, language structure, historical change, meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
