The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distributional Structure
Abstract
For the purposes of the present discussion, the term structure will be used in the following non-rigorous sense: A set of phonemes or a set of data is structured in respect to some feature, to the extent that we can form in terms of that feature some organized system of statements which describes the members of the set and their interrelations (at least up to some limit of complexity). In this sense, language can be structured in respect to various independent features. And whether it is structured (to more than a trivial extent) in respect to, say, regular historical change, social intercourse, meaning, or distribution - or to what extent it is structured in any of these respects - is a matter decidable by investigation. Here we will discuss how each language can be described in terms of a distributional structure, i.e. in terms of the occurrence of parts (ultimately sounds) relative to other parts, and how this description is complete without intrusion of other features such as history or meaning. It goes without saying that other studies of language - historical, psychological, etc.-are also possible, both in relation to distributional structure and independently of it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In LLMs, semantic similarity is determined based on distribution across contexts: words that appear in similar contexts are mapped to nearby vectors.”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“There is a deep connection between the way in which LLMs learn embeddings from linguistic corpora, and the old idea from structural linguistics according to which word meaning can be inferred from the contexts in which they appear, known as the distributional hypothesis (Firth, 1957;Harris, 1954).”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“This result mirrors a relentless trend in DL for various domains, where learned features ultimately outperform and displace long-used expert features, such as the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [8] and Bag-of-words [9].”
From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,015
Changes in Gender Stereotypes Over Time: A Computational Analysis
Bhatia, N. M., & Bhatia, S. (2020) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684320977178 · Cited by 108
Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: flexible frames for language acquisition.
Clair, M. S., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.012 · Cited by 74
Santus, E., Yung, F., Lenci, A., & Huang, C. (2015) · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-4208 · Cited by 92
Wang, W. M., Wang, J., Li, Z., Tian, Z., & Tsui, E. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.05.015 · Cited by 92
BERT-MK: Integrating Graph Contextualized Knowledge into Pre-trained Language Models
He, B., Zhou, D., Xiao, J., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., Yuan, N. J., & Xu, T. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.207 · Cited by 102
How Does Knowledge Graph Embedding Extrapolate to Unseen Data: A Semantic Evidence View
Li, R., Cao, Y., Zhu, Q., Bi, G., Fang, F., Liu, Y., & Li, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20521 · Cited by 92
From Word Embeddings to Pre-Trained Language Models: A State-of-the-Art Walkthrough
Mars, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178805 · Cited by 91
A state-of-the-art of semantic change computation
TANG, X. (2018) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324918000220 · Cited by 91
HyperLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Graded Lexical Entailment
Vulić, I., Gerz, D., Kiela, D., Hill, F., & Korhonen, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.02117 · Cited by 90
Composition in Distributional Semantics
Baroni, M. (2013) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12050 · Cited by 90
HyperLex: A Large-Scale Evaluation of Graded Lexical Entailment
Vulić, I., Gerz, D., Kiela, D., Hill, F., & Korhonen, A. (2017) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00301 · Cited by 95
Hierarchical Embeddings for Hypernymy Detection and Directionality
Nguyen, K. A., Köper, M., Walde, S. S. I., & Vu, N. T. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1022 · Cited by 90
Term variation in specialised corpora
Daille, B. (2017) · Terminology and lexicography research and practice · doi:10.1075/tlrp.19 · Cited by 105
Moharreri, K., Ha, M., & Nehm, R. H. (2014) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-014-0015-2 · Cited by 90
Polynomial Identification in the Limit of Substitutable Context-free Languages
Clark, A., & Eyraud, R. (2007) · Research Portal (King's College London) · Cited by 90
Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., & Ishizuka, M. (2010) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772707 · Cited by 90
Exploring the context of locations for personalized location recommendations
Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Li, X. (2016) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 89
Application of Latent Semantic Analysis to Divergent Thinking is Biased by Elaboration
Forthmann, B., Oyebade, O., Ojo, A., Günther, F., & Holling, H. (2018) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.240 · Cited by 93
Liu, F., Vulić, I., Korhonen, A., & Collier, N. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.109 · Cited by 110
Distributional Semantics Beyond Words: Supervised Learning of Analogy and Paraphrase
Turney, P. D. (2013) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00233 · Cited by 88
Identifying Word Translations from Comparable Corpora Using Latent Topic Models
Vulić, I., Smet, W. D., & Moens, M. (2011) · Lirias · Cited by 88
An empirical convolutional neural network approach for semantic relation classification
Qin, P., Xu, W., & Guo, J. H. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.091 · Cited by 88
2. A radically data-driven Construction Grammar: Experiments with Dutch causative constructions
Levshina, N., & Heylen, K. (2014) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110366273.17 · Cited by 88
Phonologically Aware Neural Model for Named Entity Recognition in Low Resource Transfer Settings
Bharadwaj, A., Mortensen, D. R., Dyer, C., & Carbonell, J. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1153 · Cited by 91
Lastra-Díaz, J. J., Goikoetxea, J., Taieb, M. A. H., García-Serrano, A. M., Aouicha, M. B., & Agirre, E. (2019) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2019.07.010 · Cited by 94
An Introduction to Question Answering over Linked Data
Unger, C., Freitas, A., & Cimiano, P. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10587-1_2 · Cited by 88
Sketch Algorithms for Estimating Point Queries in NLP
Goyal, A., Daumé, H., & Cormode, G. (2012) · Cited by 88
Highway Construction Safety Analysis Using Large Language Models
Smetana, M., Salles de Salles, L., Sukharev, I., & Khazanovich, L. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14041352 · Cited by 87
Adapting word2vec to Named Entity Recognition
Sienċnik, S. K. (2015) · DSpace repository (University of Tartu) · Cited by 86
Large Scale Acquisition of Paraphrases for Learning Surface Patterns
Bhagat, R., & Ravichandran, D. (2008) · Cited by 87
An Analysis of Machine- and Human-Analytics in Classification
Tam, G. K. L., Kothari, V., & Chen, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2598829 · Cited by 85
Building semantic memory from embodied and distributional language experience
Davis, C. P., & Yee, E. (2021) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1555 · Cited by 95
Wang, Z., Li, L., Song, M., Yan, J., Shi, J., & Yao, Y. (2021) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2021.113957 · Cited by 89
Mining for meaning -- The extraction of lexico-semantic knowledge from text
de Cruys, T. V. (2010) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 86
Unsupervised Cross-Modal Alignment of Speech and Text Embedding SpacesPreprint
Chung, Y.-A., Weng, W., Tong, S., & Glass, J. R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.07467 · Cited by 87
An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition
Waterfall, H., Sandbank, B., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S. (2010) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000910000024 · Cited by 85
Predicting Risk Perception: New Insights from Data Science
Bhatia, S. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3121 · Cited by 85
Transfer Learning in Natural Language Processing
Yang, Q., Zhang, Y., Dai, W., & Pan, S. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139061773.020 · Cited by 94
Latent semantic analysis cosines as a cognitive similarity measure: Evidence from priming studies
Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1038280 · Cited by 79
FederatedScope: A Flexible Federated Learning Platform for Heterogeneity
Xie, Y., Wang, Z., Gao, D., Chen, D., Yao, L., Kuang, W., Li, Y., Ding, B., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3579075.3579081 · Cited by 84
DeepAlignment: Unsupervised Ontology Matching with Refined Word Vectors
Kolyvakis, P., Kalousis, A., & Kiritsis, D. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1072 · Cited by 84
Chakraborty, I., Kim, M., & Sudhir, K. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437211052500 · Cited by 84
Applied AI for finance and accounting: Alternative data and opportunities
CAO, S. S., Jiang, W., Lei, L., & Zhou, Q. (2024) · Pacific-Basin Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102307 · Cited by 116
Zhang, H., & Zhong, G. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.03.027 · Cited by 84
A Graph Degeneracy-based Approach to Keyword Extraction
Tixier, A. J. ‐., Malliaros, F. D., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1191 · Cited by 83
Hierarchical Human Semantic Parsing with Comprehensive Part-Relation Modeling
Wang, W., Zhou, T., Qi, S., Shen, J., & Zhu, S. C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3055780 · Cited by 83
Representation learning applications in biological sequence analysis
Iuchi, H., Matsutani, T., Yamada, K., Iwano, N., Sumi, S., Hosoda, S., Zhao, S., Fukunaga, T., & Hamada, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.039 · Cited by 88
Purest ever example-based machine translation: Detailed presentation and assessment
Lepage, Y., & Denoual, E. (2006) · Machine Translation · doi:10.1007/s10590-006-9010-x · Cited by 83
Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy
Titus, L. M. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174 · Cited by 82
Internet of Things and artificial intelligence enable energy efficiency
Tomazzoli, C., Scannapieco, S., & Cristani, M. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02151-3 · Cited by 87
Representation Learning for Natural Language Processing
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., & Sun, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5573-2 · Cited by 103
Marinucci, L., Mazzuca, C., & Aldo Gangemi, A. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01474-3 · Cited by 107
Fake news detection: Taxonomy and comparative study
Farhangian, F., Cruz, R. M. O., & Cavalcanti, G. D. C. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102140 · Cited by 91
Ontology-based approach for measuring semantic similarity
Taieb, M. A. H., Aouicha, M. B., & Hamadou, A. B. (2014) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.07.015 · Cited by 82
Quantum Natural Language Processing: Challenges and Opportunities
Guarasci, R., Pietro, G. D., & Esposito, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12115651 · Cited by 85
Large Language Models: A Guide for Radiologists
Kim, S., Lee, C., & Kim, S. (2024) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2023.0997 · Cited by 83
(2024) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3674127 · Cited by 86
A Framework for Analyzing Semantic Change of Words across Time
Jatowt, A., & Duh, K. (2015) · Cited by 78
Du, S.-L., el Akremi, A., & Jia, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05297-6 · Cited by 71
Clustering articles based on semantic similarity
Wang, S., & Koopman, R. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2298-x · Cited by 78
Short-Term Meaning Shift: A Distributional Exploration
Tredici, M. D., Fernández, R., & Boleda, G. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1210 · Cited by 77
Hu, J., Rudinger, R., Post, M., & Durme, B. V. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016521 · Cited by 12
Improving Entity Linking by Modeling Latent Entity Type Information
Chen, S., Wang, J., Jiang, F., & Lin, C.-Y. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6251 · Cited by 78
Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic
Dyer, J., & Kolic, B. (2020) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-020-00334-7 · Cited by 85
Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for drug-drug interaction extraction
Suárez-Paniagua, V., & Segura-Bédmar, I. (2018) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-018-2195-1 · Cited by 76
Learning Role-based Graph EmbeddingsPreprint
Ahmed, N. K., Rossi, R. A., Lee, J. B., Willke, T. L., Zhou, R., Kong, X., & Eldardiry, H. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.02896 · Cited by 76
New Tools for Web-Scale N-grams
Lin, D., Church, K., Ji, H., Sekine, S., Yarowsky, D., Bergsma, S., Patil, K., Pitler, E., Lathbury, R., Rao, V., et al. (2010) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/44fpr4ygd2xg · Cited by 75
Specialized Knowledge Representation and the Parameterization of Context
Faber, P., & León-Araúz, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196 · Cited by 77
AI-Enabled Automation for Completeness Checking of Privacy Policies
Amaral, O., Abualhaija, S., Torre, D., Sabetzadeh, M., & Briand, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3124332 · Cited by 94
Chung, S., Moon, S., Kim, J.-H., Kim, J., Lim, S. P., & Chi, S. (2023) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105020 · Cited by 87
Measuring the similarity between implicit semantic relations from the web
Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., & Ishizuka, M. (2009) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/1526709.1526797 · Cited by 74
Magnus, M. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0010 · Cited by 73
How Well Do Distributional Models Capture Different Types of Semantic Knowledge?
Rubinstein, D., Levi, E., Schwartz, R., & Rappoport, A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-2119 · Cited by 74
Campos, D. G., Fütterer, T., Gfrörer, T., Lavelle-Hill, R., Murayama, K., König, L., Hecht, M., Zitzmann, S., & Scherer, R. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09862-5 · Cited by 75
Huang, Q., Xia, X., Lo, D., & Murphy, G. C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2876340 · Cited by 78
Still a Pain in the Neck: Evaluating Text Representations on Lexical Composition
Shwartz, V., & Dagan, I. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00277 · Cited by 73
How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages.
DeFranza, D., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000188 · Cited by 80
Sinha, K., Parthasarathi, P., Pineau, J., & Williams, A. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.569 · Cited by 98
A comparative evaluation and analysis of three generations of Distributional Semantic Models
Lenci, A., Sahlgren, M., Jeuniaux, P. P. J. M. H., Gyllensten, A. C., & Miliani, M. (2022) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-021-09575-z · Cited by 97
DeepStyle: Multimodal Search Engine for Fashion and Interior Design
Tautkutė, I., Trzcinski, T. P., Skorupa, A., Lukasz, K., & Marasek, K. P. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2923552 · Cited by 78
Heterogeneous Supervision for Relation Extraction: A Representation Learning Approach
Liu, L., Ren, X., Zhu, Q., Zhi, S., Gui, H., Ji, H., & Han, J. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1005 · Cited by 72
A probabilistic clustering model for hate speech classification in twitter
Ayo, F. E., Folorunso, O. O., Ibharalu, F. T., Osinuga, I. A., & Abayomi-Alli, A. A. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114762 · Cited by 72
BabyBERTa: Learning More Grammar With Small-Scale Child-Directed Language
Huebner, P. A., Sulem, E., Fisher, C. L., & Roth, D. (2021) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.49 · Cited by 78
Spada, I., Chiarello, F., Barandoni, S., Ruggi, G., Martini, A., & Fantoni, G. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121869 · Cited by 91
Automated real estate valuation with machine learning models using property descriptions
Baur, K., Rosenfelder, M., & Lutz, B. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119147 · Cited by 91
Gugulica, M., & Burghardt, D. (2023) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101508 · Cited by 72
Real-Time Segmentation and Recognition of Surgical Tasks in Cataract Surgery Videos
Quellec, G., Lamard, M., Cochener, B., & Cazuguel, G. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2340473 · Cited by 72
Explicit Retrofitting of Distributional Word Vectors
Glavaš, G., & Vulić, I. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1004 · Cited by 71
A Simple Theoretical Model of Importance for Summarization
Peyrard, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1101 · Cited by 71
Efficient feature selection techniques for sentiment analysis
Madasu, A., & Elango, S. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-08409-z · Cited by 83
Using structural topic modeling to gain insight into challenges faced by leaders
Tonidandel, S., Summerville, K. M., Gentry, W. A., & Young, S. F. (2021) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101576 · Cited by 79
Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution
Hassel, M., & Dalianis, H. (2011) · Cited by 71
Topic models: A novel method for modeling couple and family text data.
Atkins, D. C., Rubin, T. N., Mark Steyvers, B., Doeden, M. A., Baucom, B., & Christensen, A. (2012) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029607 · Cited by 75
Semi-supervised semantic role labeling using the latent words language model
Deschacht, K., & Moens, M. (2009) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/1699510.1699514 · Cited by 71
PERUSE: An unsupervised algorithm for finding recurring patterns in time series
Oates, T. (2003) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2002.1183920 · Cited by 71
Word Embeddings as Metric Recovery in Semantic Spaces
Hashimoto, T., Alvarez-Melis, D., & Jaakkola, T. (2016) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00098 · Cited by 71
Embedding Regression: Models for Context-Specific Description and Inference
RODRIGUEZ, P. L., SPIRLING, A., & STEWART, B. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422001228 · Cited by 70
Polarity Inducing Latent Semantic Analysis
Yih, W.-T., Zweig, G., & Platt, J. C. (2012) · Cited by 70
Mota, N. B., Weissheimer, J., Ribeiro, M., de Paiva, M. M. M., Avilla-Souza, J., Simabucuru, G., Chaves, M. F., Cecchi, L., de Oliveira, J. B. C., Cecchi, G., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242903 · Cited by 78
Latent Semantic Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation
de Cruys, T. V., & Apidianaki, M. (2011) · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, Z. S.
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Zellig S.
- Venue
- WORD
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1954-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 146-162
- ISSN
- 0043-7956 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2882319491
- Cited by
- 4,807
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 181 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 371 · 2022: 365 · 2021: 428 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 474 · 2018: 373 · 2017: 324 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 242 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- WORD (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- phonemes, phonological features, phonological description, sound distribution, language structure, historical change, meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
