The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distributional Structure
Abstract
For the purposes of the present discussion, the term structure will be used in the following non-rigorous sense: A set of phonemes or a set of data is structured in respect to some feature, to the extent that we can form in terms of that feature some organized system of statements which describes the members of the set and their interrelations (at least up to some limit of complexity). In this sense, language can be structured in respect to various independent features. And whether it is structured (to more than a trivial extent) in respect to, say, regular historical change, social intercourse, meaning, or distribution - or to what extent it is structured in any of these respects - is a matter decidable by investigation. Here we will discuss how each language can be described in terms of a distributional structure, i.e. in terms of the occurrence of parts (ultimately sounds) relative to other parts, and how this description is complete without intrusion of other features such as history or meaning. It goes without saying that other studies of language - historical, psychological, etc.-are also possible, both in relation to distributional structure and independently of it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In LLMs, semantic similarity is determined based on distribution across contexts: words that appear in similar contexts are mapped to nearby vectors.”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“There is a deep connection between the way in which LLMs learn embeddings from linguistic corpora, and the old idea from structural linguistics according to which word meaning can be inferred from the contexts in which they appear, known as the distributional hypothesis (Firth, 1957;Harris, 1954).”
From The Vector Grounding Problem (2026) · cites this paper as Harris, 1954
In the citing paper
“This result mirrors a relentless trend in DL for various domains, where learned features ultimately outperform and displace long-used expert features, such as the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [8] and Bag-of-words [9].”
From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,015
Han, Z., Liu, Z., Vong, C., Liu, Y.-S., Bu, S., Han, J., & Chen, C. L. P. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2816821 · Cited by 54
Based on billions of words on the internet, people = men
Bailey, A. H., Williams, A., & Cimpian, A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm2463 · Cited by 61
Shen, W., Wang, J., Luo, P., & Wang, M. (2012) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339753 · Cited by 54
Learning Representations for Weakly Supervised Natural Language Processing Tasks
Huang, F., Ahuja, A., Downey, D., Yang, Y., Guo, Y., & Yates, A. (2013) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00167 · Cited by 54
Distributional Correspondence Indexing for Cross-Lingual and Cross-Domain Sentiment Classification.
Fernández, A. M., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2016) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.4762 · Cited by 53
SCDV : Sparse Composite Document Vectors using soft clustering over distributional representations
Mekala, D., Gupta, V., Paranjape, B., & Karnick, H. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1069 · Cited by 54
Device-Agnostic Log Anomaly Classification with Partial Labels
Meng, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Pei, D., Dong, H. F., Song, L., & Luo, X. (2018) · International Workshop on Quality of Service · doi:10.1109/iwqos.2018.8624141 · Cited by 54
Source code properties of defective infrastructure as code scripts
Rahman, A., & Williams, L. A. (2019) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2019.04.013 · Cited by 54
Machine Meets Man: Evaluating the Psychological Reality of Corpus-based Probabilistic Models
Divjak, D., Dąbrowska, E., & Arppe, A. (2016) · Cognitive Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0101 · Cited by 53
Understanding Short Texts through Semantic Enrichment and Hashing
Zheng, Y., Wang, H., Lin, X., & Wang, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2015.2485224 · Cited by 53
Learning distributed word representation with multi-contextual mixed embedding
Li, J., Li, J., Fu, X., Masud, M. A., & Huang, J. Z. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.045 · Cited by 53
Droste, N., D’Amato, D., & Goddard, J. J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204749 · Cited by 56
DeepCrystal: a deep learning framework for sequence-based protein crystallization prediction
Elbasir, A., Moovarkumudalvan, B., Kunji, K. B., Kolatkar, P. R., Mall, R., & Bensmail, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty953 · Cited by 54
Odden, T. O. B., Marin, A., & Caballero, M. D. (2020) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.010142 · Cited by 57
Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Lepkova, N., Raslanas, S., Dauksys, K., Vetloviene, I., & Ubartė, I. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137420 · Cited by 57
A Unified Multilingual Semantic Representation of Concepts
Camacho-Collados, J., Pilehvar, M. T., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1072 · Cited by 52
Unsupervised Compositionality Prediction of Nominal Compounds
Cordeiro, S., Villavicencio, A., Idiart, M., & Ramisch, C. (2018) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00341 · Cited by 52
Chaloner, K., & Maldonado, A. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3804 · Cited by 52
A Survey of Domain Ontology Engineering: Methods and Tools
Zouaq, A., & Nkambou, R. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_6 · Cited by 52
Why Question Answering using Sentiment Analysis and Word Classes
Oh, J., Torisawa, K., Hashimoto, C., Kawada, T., Saeger, S. D., Kazama, J., & Wang, Y. (2012) · Cited by 52
Emotion-Semantic-Enhanced Neural Network
Yang, G., He, H., & Chen, Q. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2018.2885775 · Cited by 52
Distributed semantic representations for modeling human judgment
Bhatia, S., Richie, R., & Zou, W. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.020 · Cited by 57
Machine learning innovations in address matching: A practical comparison of word2vec and CRFs
Comber, S., & Arribas‐Bel, D. (2019) · Transactions in GIS · doi:10.1111/tgis.12522 · Cited by 52
Are We Consistently Biased? Multidimensional Analysis of Biases in Distributional Word Vectors
Lauscher, A., & Glavaš, G. (2019) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-1010 · Cited by 55
Word-class embeddings for multiclass text classification
Moreo, A., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2021) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-020-00735-3 · Cited by 56
The Origins and the Evolution of Language
Mufwene, S. S. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0002 · Cited by 53
A Fake Online Repository Generation Engine for Cyber Deception
Chakraborty, T., Jajodia, S., Katz, J. I., Picariello, A., Sperlí, G., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2019.2898661 · Cited by 51
LearningToAdapt with word embeddings: Domain adaptation of Named Entity Recognition systems
Nozza, D., Manchanda, P., Fersini, E., Palmonari, M., & Messina, E. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102537 · Cited by 56
Gatti, D., Marelli, M., & Rinaldi, L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001304 · Cited by 49
A Neural Network Approach to the Measure of Management Accounting Practices
Qiu, F., Hu, N., Liang, P., & Dow, K. E. (2020) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2022.100818 · Cited by 63
A Comprehensive Review on Multiple Instance Learning
Fatima, S., Ali, S., & Kim, H. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12204323 · Cited by 51
Boosting crop classification by hierarchically fusing satellite, rotational, and contextual data
Barrière, V., Claverie, M., Schneider, M., Lemoine, G., & d’Andrimont, R. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114110 · Cited by 61
Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation
Blanchard, D., Heinz, J. N., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500090999050x · Cited by 51
A framework for robust discovery of entity synonyms
Chakrabarti, K., Chaudhuri, S., Cheng, T., & Xin, D. (2012) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2339530.2339743 · Cited by 51
Learning Word Representations by Jointly Modeling Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relations
Sun, F., Guo, J., Lan, Y., Xu, J., & Cheng, X. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1014 · Cited by 51
Selecting Proper Lexical Paraphrase for Children
Kajiwara, T., Matsumoto, H., & Yamamoto, K. (2013) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 51
Introduction to Computational Cultural Psychology
Neuman, Y. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139198851 · Cited by 51
Learning Disjointness for Debugging Mappings between Lightweight Ontologies
Meilicke, C., Völker, J., & Stuckenschmidt, H. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_11 · Cited by 50
The Hidden Markov Topic Model: A Probabilistic Model of Semantic Representation
Andrews, M. W., & Vigliocco, G. (2010) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01074.x · Cited by 50
Xun, G., Li, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, A. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098009 · Cited by 50
NLP-Based Approach to Semantic Classification of Heterogeneous Transportation Asset Data Terminology
Le, T., & Jeong, H. D. (2017) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000701 · Cited by 50
Syed, S., Borit, M., & Spruit, M. R. (2018) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12280 · Cited by 50
Biomedical ontology alignment: an approach based on representation learning
Kolyvakis, P., Kalousis, A., Smith, B., & Kiritsis, D. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/s13326-018-0187-8 · Cited by 50
Stop Word Lists in Free Open-source Software Packages
Nothman, J., Qin, H., & Yurchak, R. (2018) · Workshop for NLP Open Source Software (NLP-OSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-2502 · Cited by 50
Digital begriffsgeschichte: Tracing semantic change using word embeddings
Wevers, M., & Koolen, M. (2020) · Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.1080/01615440.2020.1760157 · Cited by 60
Carota, F., Nili, H., Friedemann Pulvermüller, A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117408 · Cited by 51
From remembering to reconstruction: The transformative neural representation of episodic memory.
Xue, G. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102351 · Cited by 49
Expansion of medical vocabularies using distributional semantics on Japanese patient blogs
Ahltorp, M., Skeppstedt, M., Kitajima, S., Henriksson, A., Rzepka, R., & Araki, K. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Semantics · doi:10.1186/s13326-016-0093-x · Cited by 49
Schuler, K. D., Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. Ν. (2017) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2016.1263571 · Cited by 47
Semantic coherence markers: The contribution of perplexity metrics
Colla, D., Delsanto, M., Agosto, M., Vitiello, B., & Radicioni, D. P. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102393 · Cited by 52
Learning concept hierarchies from textual resources for ontologies construction
Rios-Alvarado, A. B., López-Arévalo, I., & Sosa‐Sosa, V. J. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.005 · Cited by 49
A domain-independent process for automatic ontology population from text
de Faria, C. G., Serra, I., & Girardi, R. (2013) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2013.12.005 · Cited by 49
Computing the semantic similarity of geographic terms using volunteered lexical definitions
Ballatore, A., Wilson, D. C., & Bertolotto, M. (2013) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.790548 · Cited by 49
Measuring the short text similarity based on semantic and syntactic information
Yang, J., Li, Y., Gao, C., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.07.043 · Cited by 49
American Sign Language Curricula: A Review
Rosen, R. S. (2010) · Sign Language Studies · doi:10.1353/sls.0.0050 · Cited by 48
Lexicography from Earliest Times to the Present
Hanks, P. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0023 · Cited by 50
Improving Access to Justice with Legal Chatbots
Queudot, M., Charton, É., & Meurs, M. (2020) · Stats · doi:10.3390/stats3030023 · Cited by 67
A survey on training and evaluation of word embeddings
Torregrossa, F., Allesiardo, R., Claveau, V., Kooli, N., & Gravier, G. (2021) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00242-8 · Cited by 53
Classifying spam emails using agglomerative hierarchical clustering and a topic-based approach
Jáñez-Martino, F., Aláiz-Rodríguez, R., González‐Castro, V., Fidalgo, E., & Alegre, E. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110226 · Cited by 64
Doing Organizational Identity: Earnings Surprises and the Performative Atypicality Premium
Gouvard, P., Goldberg, A., & Srivastava, S. B. (2023) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392231180872 · Cited by 48
Dynamic and Static Prototype Vectors for Semantic Composition
Reddy, S., Klapaftis, I. P., McCarthy, D., & Manandhar, S. (2011) · Cited by 48
Word Co-Occurrence Regularized Non-Negative Matrix Tri-Factorization for Text Data Co-Clustering
Salah, A., Ailem, M., & Nadif, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11659 · Cited by 48
Multi-sense embeddings through a word sense disambiguation process
Ruas, T., Grosky, W. I., & Aizawa, A. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.026 · Cited by 47
Agile text mining for the 2014 i2b2/UTHealth Cardiac risk factors challenge
Cormack, J. G., Nath, C., Milward, D., Raja, K., & Jonnalagadda, S. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.030 · Cited by 48
Modeling Order in Neural Word Embeddings at ScalePreprint
Trask, A., Gilmore, D., & Russell, M. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02338 · Cited by 48
Query Expansion with Locally-Trained Word EmbeddingsPreprint
Díaz, F., Mitra, B., & Craswell, N. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07891 · Cited by 97
A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patil, R., & Gudivada, A. V. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202402.0357.v1 · Cited by 296
Vernaculars and the Idea of a Standard Language
Linn, A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585847.013.0016 · Cited by 48
Lu, Z., Sim, J.-A., Wang, J. X., Forrest, C. B., Krull, K. R., Srivastava, D. K., Hudson, M. M., Robison, L. L., Baker, J. N., & Huang, I. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26777 · Cited by 47
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108862059 · Cited by 67
Hameed, S., Nauman, M. A., Akhtar, N., Fayyaz, M. A. B., & Nawaz, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1627078 · Cited by 70
Rehabilitation of Count-Based Models for Word Vector Representations
Lebret, R., & Collobert, R. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_31 · Cited by 47
Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., & Ishizuka, M. (2009) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/1699571.1699617 · Cited by 47
Prototype-driven grammar induction
Haghighi, A., & Klein, D. (2006) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220286 · Cited by 47
Ontologies and the Semantic Web
Grimm, S., Abecker, A., Völker, J., & Studer, R. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_13 · Cited by 47
Is This a Paraphrase? What Kind? Paraphrase Boundaries and Typology
Vila, M. G., Martí, M. A., & Rodríguez, H. (2014) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2014.41016 · Cited by 47
Bag-of-embeddings for text classification
Jin, P., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Xia, Y. (2016) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 46
pair2vec: Compositional Word-Pair Embeddings for Cross-Sentence Inference
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Levy, O., Weld, D. S., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1362 · Cited by 50
Feature-based software design pattern detection
Nazar, N., Aleti, A., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111179 · Cited by 53
Wei, M., Harzevili, N. S., Huang, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510159 · Cited by 51
Tareq, M., Islam, M. F., Deb, S., Rahman, S., & Mahmud, A. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3277787 · Cited by 54
The latent words language model
Deschacht, K., Belder, J. D., & Moens, M. (2012) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2012.04.001 · Cited by 46
Jointly optimizing word representations for lexical and sentential tasks with the C-PHRASE model
Pham, N. T., Kruszewski, G., Lazaridou, A., & Baroni, M. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1094 · Cited by 46
ATR4S: toolkit with state-of-the-art automatic terms recognition methods in Scala
Астраханцев, Н. А. (2017) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-017-9409-4 · Cited by 46
Distinguishing Antonyms and Synonyms in a Pattern-based Neural Network
Nguyen, K. A., Walde, S. S. I., & Vu, N. T. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1008 · Cited by 48
Towards a dynamic behavioral profile: A diachronic study of polysemous sentir in Spanish
Jansegers, M., & Gries, S. Τ. (2017) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0080 · Cited by 46
User-Level Race and Ethnicity Predictors from Twitter Text
Preoțiuc-Pietro, D., & Ungar, L. (2018) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 50
Predicting of anaphylaxis in big data EMR by exploring machine learning approaches
Segura-Bédmar, I., Colón-Ruíz, C., Tejedor, M. A., & Moro‐Moro, M. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.012 · Cited by 48
GrAMME: Semisupervised Learning Using Multilayered Graph Attention Models
Shanthamallu, U. S., Thiagarajan, J. J., Song, H., & Spanias, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2948797 · Cited by 51
Understanding the role of linguistic distributional knowledge in cognition
Wingfield, C., & Connell, L. (2022) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2022.2069278 · Cited by 51
Resource Lean and Portable Automatic Text Summarization
Hassel, M. (2007) · Cited by 46
Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know AboutPreprint
Athey, S. C., & Imbens, G. W. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.10075 · Cited by 65
A linguistic investigation into unsupervised DOP
Bod, R. (2007) · Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (CogACLL) · doi:10.3115/1629795.1629796 · Cited by 45
Entrepreneurial Learning and Disincentives in Crowdfunding Markets
Xu, Y., & Ni, J. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4248 · Cited by 45
DefensePredictor: A machine learning model to discover prokaryotic immune systems
DeWeirdt, P. C., Mahoney, E. M., & Laub, M. T. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adv7924 · Cited by 53
Data-driven semantic analysis for multilingual WSD and lexical selection in translation
Apidianaki, M. (2009) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1609067.1609075 · Cited by 44
Exploring Word Embedding for Drug Name Recognition
Segura-Bédmar, I., Suárez-Paniagua, V., & Martı́nez, P. (2015) · International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis (LOUHI) · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-2608 · Cited by 45
Cross-Lingual Semantic Similarity of Words as the Similarity of Their Semantic Word Responses
Vulić, I., & Moens, M. (2013) · Lirias · Cited by 45
A Minimally Supervised Approach for Synonym Extraction with Word Embeddings
Leeuwenberg, A. M., Vela, M., Dehdari, J., & van Genabith, J. (2016) · The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics · doi:10.1515/pralin-2016-0006 · Cited by 45
Artetxe, M., Labaka, G., López-Gazpio, I., & Agirre, E. (2018) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k18-1028 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, Z. S.
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Zellig S.
- Venue
- WORD
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1954-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 146-162
- ISSN
- 0043-7956 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-5112
- OpenAlex
- W2882319491
- Cited by
- 4,807
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 181 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 303 · 2023: 371 · 2022: 365 · 2021: 428 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 474 · 2018: 373 · 2017: 324 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 242 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- WORD (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- phonemes, phonological features, phonological description, sound distribution, language structure, historical change, meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review