Cited by 107

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Archaeologies that hurt; descendants that matter: A pragmatic approach to collaboration in the public interpretation of African-American archaeology

McDavid, Carol·2002·World Archaeology

Abstract

Pragmatism's anti-essentialist emphasis on contingency and plurality and its notion of truth-as-created (not discovered) have important implications for the interpretation of archaeological data, and for the 'public presentation' of archaeological research. This paper will examine a pragmatically oriented project in Brazoria, Texas, USA, in which archaeologists and local citizens (including site descendants) have collaborated to create an Internet website to discuss the politically and emotionally charged archaeologies and histories of an eighteenth-century sugar plantation. It will discuss ways in which a pragmatic philosophical framework has given archaeologists new ways of approaching and 'conversing' about their data, and new ways of dealing, openly and non-hierarchically, with the communities most affected by their research. It will also discuss ways in which elements of post-processual archaeological theory - multivocality, interactivity, reflexivity and contextuality - were incorporated within both the content and delivery of the website, and will close with a short discussion about whether these strategies were effective in creating an open, relevant, democratic and multivocal discourse about archaeology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0043824022000007116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Brown K. L., 1994, Working Toward Freedom: Slave Society and Domestic Economy in the American South, 95
  2. Brown K. L., 1990, Historical Archaeology on Southern Plantations and Farms, Historical Archaeology, special issue of Historical Archaeology, 24, 7
  3. Dewey J., 1916, Essays, Philosophical and Psychological, in Honor of William James, 49
  4. Goodman R. B., 1995, Pragmatism: A Contemporary Reader
  5. Hodder 1., 1997, Antiquity, 71, 691, 10.1017/S0003598X00085410 · DOI
  6. Hodder I., 1995, Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past
  7. James W., 1995, Pragmatism: A Contemporary Reader, 53
  8. James W., 1996, A Pluralistic Universe
  9. 10.1086/203531 · DOI · Paper page
  10. McDavid C., 1996, The Levi Jordan Plantation: from archaeological interpretation to public interpretation
  11. McDavid C., 1997, In the Realm of Politics: Prospects for Public Participation in African-American Archaeology, special issue of Historical Archaeology, 31, 114
  12. McDavid C., 1999, Internet Archaeology (Special Theme: Digital Publication), 6
  13. McDavid C., 2002, From real space to Cyberspace: the Internet and public archaeological practice
  14. McDavid C., 2002, Places in Mind: Archaeology as Applied Anthropology
  15. McDavid C., 2003, Public Archaeology
  16. McDavid C., 1997, special issue of Historical Archaeology, 31
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511804397 · DOI
  18. Rorty R., 1991, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, 1
  19. West C., 1993, Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McDavid, C.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2002-09
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
303-314
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
107
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review