CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageCultural Identity and Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collaborative Archaeology to Revitalize an Afro-Ecuadorian Cemetery

Balanzátegui Moreno, Daniela Catalina·2018·Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage
DOI 10.1080/21619441.2018.1480117
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article presents an ongoing project to revitalize an Afro-Ecuadorian cemetery called the “Garden of Memory, Martina Carrillo,” dating from the eighteenth through twentieth centuries, and located in the community of La Concepción, in the Chota-Mira Valley of northern Ecuador. Throughout the design of a proposal for restoration of the cemetery the community of African descendants, including the National Coordinator of Black Women-Carchi, called CONAMUNE-Carchi, and a group of Ecuadorian archaeologists, employed a collaborative approach to the history and restoration of this sacred place. The archaeological project contributes to the recognition of local histories, development of an intercultural investigation, a reflexive understanding of the past and material culture of local community members, and commemoration of their African diaspora ancestors. This project’s methodology focused on achieving a form of historical reparations for the African descendants who were impacted by colonial slavery and racism in Ecuador.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21619441.2018.1480117

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been archaeologists from Latin America, working in Latin America, who have steadfastly applied the principles of community-based research in their work.

    “Nonetheless, there have been archaeologists from Latin America, working in Latin America, who have steadfastly applied the principles of community-based research in their work (e.g. Hernández Álvarez & Martín Medina 2016; Balanzátegui Moreno 2018; Ichikawa 2018; Migeon 2019; Diserens Morgan & Leventhal 2020; Harrison-Buck & Clarke-Vivier 2020; Fryer & Diserens Morgan 2021; McAnany et al. 2021;”

    From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Balanzátegui Moreno 2018

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Benavides Hugo., 2005, Arqueología Suramericana, 1, 5
  2. CONAMUNE Imbabura and Carchi, 2015, Agenda Política de Mujeres Afrodescendientes del Territorio Ancestral de Imbabura y Carchi
  3. Coronel Rosario., 1991, El Vallesangriento de los Indígenas de la Coca y el Algodón a la Hacienda Cañerajesuita: 1586–1700
  4. Corruccini Robert S., 1985, Human Biology, 57, 699
  5. Cortez Amada., 2009, Me Llaman la Cimarrona
  6. Cuddy Thomas W., 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 203
  7. Da Silva Pereira Júlio César Medeiros., 2007, À Flor da Terra: O Cemitério dos Pretos Novos no Rio de Janeiro
  8. De Ron Antonio., 1696, Libro de Composiciones de Tierras del Colegio de la Compañía de Jesús, Hechas por Antonio De Ron en 1696
  9. García Jesús Chucho., 2001, Comunidades Afroamericanas y Transformaciones Sociales
  10. Hall Stuart., 1990, Framework, 36, 222
  11. Jijón y Caamaño Jacinto., 1912, Contribución al Conocimiento de los Aborígenes de la Provincia de Imbabura en la República del Ecuador
  12. Katzer Leticia, 2011, Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social, 2, 59
  13. Klaus Haagen D., 2013, Hybrid Material Culture: The Archaeology of Syncretism and Ethnogenesis, 207
  14. Logue Kyle D., 2004, Boston University Law Review, 84, 1319
  15. Lucena Manuel., 1995, Revista Estudios de Historia Social y Económica de America, 12, 117
  16. McDavid Carol., 2000, Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, 221
  17. Mills Barbara J., 1996, Society for American Archaeology Bulletin, 14, 18
  18. Mills Barbara J., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 25
  19. Pabón Iván., 2009, Mallki: Revista Pedagógica Bimensual de Educación Intercultural, 5, 1
  20. Rahier Jean., 1999, Ecuador Racista: Imágenes e Identidades, 73
  21. Shackel Paul A., 2008, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities, 225
  22. Silliman Stephen W., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 1
  23. Silliman Stephen W., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology, 67
  24. Ubelaker Douglas H., 2005, Studies in Historical Anthropology, 2, 45
  25. Villalba Jorge., 1983, Revista del Instituto de Historia Eclesiástica Ecuatoriana, 7, 15
  26. Wade Peter., 1997, Gente Negra, Nación Mestiza: Dinámicas de las Identidades Raciales en Colombia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Balanzátegui Moreno, D. C.
Affiliations
Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
ORCID
Balanzátegui Moreno, Daniela Catalina
Venue
Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
42-69
ISSN
  • 2161-9441 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-9468
DOI
10.1080/21619441.2018.1480117
OpenAlex
W2808277949
Cited by
18
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage (publishedVersion)
Funders
SENESCYT
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
Keywords
collaborative archaeology, cemetery restoration, African descendants, African diaspora, commemoration, historical reparation, colonial slavery, racism, intercultural studies, material culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review