Cited by 38Archaeological Research and ProtectionUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies

Viewing places: GIS applications for examining the perception of space in the mountains of Sicily

Fitzjohn, Matthew·2007·World Archaeology

Abstract

Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are increasingly used to appreciate how past people experienced their world. Two key approaches, visibility and cost surface studies, have been the dominant form of analysis to help archaeologists to reconstruct and visualize space, in other words to help archaeologists understand what it was like to be 'there' in the past. This paper seeks to question the use of these analyses in Mediterranean landscape archaeology with a discussion of the results from a series of interviews with the inhabitants of Troina, a town in the Nebrodi Mountains of Sicily. Focusing on the visualization of the results from a photo elicitation study, I aim to show how people construct images of the space in which they dwell. The results suggest that we need to review the assumptions that we make about landscape perception in archaeological research and the (GIS) methods we use to study them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438240601136439

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ayala G., 2003, The Alluvial Archaeology of North West Europe and the Mediterranean, 229
  2. Harris T., 2000, Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, 116
  3. Malone C., 2000, Sicilia Archeologica, 33, 97
  4. Tschan A. P., 2000, Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, 28
  5. Wheatley D, 2000, Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzjohn, M.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Fitzjohn, Matthew
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2007-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
36-50
ISSN
  • 0043-8243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1375
OpenAlex
W2037349615
Cited by
38
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Liverpool
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Keywords
landscape perception, visibility analysis, photo-elicitation, Nebrodi Mountains, Sicily, archaeological GIS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review