Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconstructing visual landscapes

Llobera, Marcos·2007·World Archaeology

Abstract

The following paper reiterates the importance of studying past visibility patterns within the context of landscape archaeology. In spite of the many difficulties and criticisms revolving around this topic, efforts aimed at reconstructing these patterns and exploring their possible roles are considered to be central to the reconstruction of social landscapes. This paper extends previous GIS work done on inter-visibility by making reference to the concept of ‘co-visibility’, by exploring the way in which visibility of any monument or set of monuments is shared with that of other monuments. A subset of round barrows from the Yorkshire Wolds (northern England) is used to illustrate this work. The study also underlines the need to address the variability which is often present in archaeological data, variability, in this case, of visibility patterns associated with the barrows due to our lack of precise chronological information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438240601136496

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bare earth viewshed analysis has been critiqued as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover.

    “This type of bare earth viewshed analysis has been justifiably subjected to critique as an unreliable and even spurious simulacrum of visibility affordances in areas with variably occlusive vegetation cover (see, e.g., Gillings, 2009;Llobera, 2007aLlobera, , 2007b)).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Barnatt J., 1997, The Peak District: Landscapes through Time
  2. Barrett J., 1994, Fragments from Antiquity: An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900–1200
  3. Barrett J., 2004, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 199
  4. Bender B., 1998, Stonehenge: Making Space
  5. Bloch M., 1995, The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space, 63, 10.1093/oso/9780198278801.003.0004 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/S1380203805001583 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90042-8 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/3235733 · DOI
  9. Criado Boado F., 1995, Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past
  10. 10.1177/146195710000300203 · DOI
  11. Cummings V., 2004, Places of Special Virtue: Megaliths in the Neolithic Landscapes of Wales
  12. Curry M., 1998, Digital Places, 10.4324/9780203288573 · DOI
  13. Exon S., 2000, Stonehenge Landscapes: Journeys through Real-and-Imagined Worlds
  14. Fraser D., 1983, Land and Society in Neolithic Orkney
  15. Gaffney V., 1996, Anthropology, Space, and Geographic Information Systems, 132
  16. Gell A., 1995, The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space, 232, 10.1093/oso/9780198278801.003.0011 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/1468-0092.00041 · DOI
  18. Higuchi T., 1983, The Visual and Spatial Structure of Landscapes
  19. Hoffman D. D., 1998, Visual Intelligence: How We Create What We See
  20. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ingold T., 2001, The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography, 113
  22. 10.1006/jasc.1997.0197 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Llobera M., 2006, Digital Archaeology, 148
  24. Manby T. G., 1988, Archaeology in Eastern Yorkshire: Essays in Honour of T. C. M. Brewster, 35
  25. Manby T. G., 2003, The Archaeology of Yorkshire: An Assessment at the Beginning of the 21st Century, 35
  26. Mlekuz D., 2004, Internet Archaeology, 16
  27. Moore J. D., 2005, Cultural Landscapes in the Ancient Landscape
  28. Schiffman H. R., 2001, Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach
  29. Stoertz C., 1997, Ancient Landscapes of the Yorkshire Wolds
  30. Thomas J., 1993, Landscapes: Politics and Perspectives, 1
  31. Thomas J., 2004, Archaeology and Modernity, 10.4324/9780203491119 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tilley C., 1994, A Phenomenology of Landscape
  33. 10.1017/S0959774304000125 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0959774304240057 · DOI
  35. Watson A., 1999, Antiquity, 73, 325, 10.1017/S0003598X00088281 · DOI
  36. Wheatley D., 1995, Archaeology and GIS: A European Perspective, 171
  37. Wolfe J. M., 2006, Sensation and Perception
  38. Woodward A., 2002, British Barrows: A Matter of Life and Death
  39. Woodward A. B., 1996, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 62, 275, 10.1017/S0079497X00002814 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Llobera, M.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2007-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
51-69
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
104
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review