The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Private property, public archaeology: resident communities as stakeholders in American archaeology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Garden Creek Archaeological Project was conducted on private land in western North Carolina from 2011 to 2014.
“The Garden Creek Archaeological Project (GCAP), conducted on private land in western North Carolina from 2011 to 2014, underscores some of the challenges and opportunities that can emerge from efforts to muster an archaeologically inclined residential community (Wright 2015).”
From The Future of American Archaeology: Engage the Voting Public or Kiss Your Research Goodbye! (2018) · cites this paper as Wright 2015
The ‘Challenges and opportunities of resident community engagement’ section says Wright initiated GCAP in 2011 at Garden Creek in western North Carolina. The paper also describes the site as privately owned, but the passages do not establish that the project continued through 2014; the 2014 dates appear in citations to other publications. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Public Memory and the Search for Power in American Historical Archaeology
Shackel, P. A. (2001) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.3.655 · Cited by 103
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Allen W. C., 1935, The Annals of Haywood County, North Carolina: Historical, Sociological, Biographical, and Genealogical
- 10.1525/tph.2012.34.3.40 · DOI
- Atalay S., 2012, Community-Based Archaeology: Research With, By, and for Indigenous and Local Communities, 10.1525/9780520953468 · DOI
- Byrne D., 2002, After Captain Cook: The Archaeology of the Recent Indigenous Past in Australia, 135
- Casey E. S., 1987, Remembering: A Phenomenological Study
- Coltman E., 2004, Legends, Tales & History of Cold Mountain, Book I
- Colwell-Chanthaphonh C., 2007, Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities
- Duncan B. R., 2003, Cherokee Heritage Trails Guidebook
- Ehle J., 1988, Trail of Tears: The Rise and Fall of the Cherokee Nation
- Gallivan M. D., 2007, Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement, 47
- 10.2307/3377910 · DOI
- Harrison R., 2004, Shared Landscapes: Archaeologies of Attachment and the Pastoral Industry in New South Wales
- Harrison R., 2002, After Captain Cook: The Archaeology of the Recent Indigenous Past in Australia
- Hatley T. M., 1993, The Dividing Paths: Cherokees and South Carolinians through the Era of Revolution, 10.1093/oso/9780195069891.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1006/jevp.1997.0060 · DOI
- Hayden D., 1995, The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History
- Heye G. G., 1919, Certain Mounds in Haywood County, North Carolina, 10.5479/sil.451435.39088016090664 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.1476 · DOI
- Keel B. C., 1976, Cherokee Archaeology: A Study of the Appalachian Summit
- Kerber J. E., 2006, Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Native Peoples and Archaeology in the Northeastern United States
- Lepofsky D., 2011, SAA Archaeological Record, 11, 17
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001 · DOI
- Low S. M., 1992, Human Behavior and Environment, 12, 1
- Michel M., 2003, SAA Archaeological Record, 3, 4
- Neumann T. W., 2010, Cultural Resources Archaeology: An Introduction
- Russell I., 2010, Heritage Values in Contemporary Society, 29
- Seamon D., Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications, 12
- Silliman S. W., 2008, Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology
- Swidler N., 1997, Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground
- Van Keuren S., 2003, SAA Archaeological Record, 3, 8
- Ward H. T., 1999, Time Before History: The Archaeology of North Carolina
- 10.2307/3557080 · DOI
- 10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277 · DOI
- 10.15184/aqy.2014.34 · DOI
- Zimmerman L. J., 2005, Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonising Theory and Practice, 284
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Future of American Archaeology: Engage the Voting Public or Kiss Your Research Goodbye!
Klein, T. H., Goldstein, L., Gangloff, D., Lees, W. B., Ryzewski, K., Styles, B. W., & Wright, A. P. (2018) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2017.34 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWestmont, V. C. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00592-w · Cited by 12
On the monumentality of ditches
Everhart, T. D. (2021) · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2021.101295 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, A. P.
- Venue
- World Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-03-15
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212-224
- ISSN
- 0043-8243
- 1470-1375
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Directorate for Biological Sciences (BCS-1225872)
- University of Michigan Arts of Citizenship Program (Graduate Fellowship for Public Scholarship)
- University of Michigan Museum of Anthropological Archaeology (Griffin Fellowship)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
