Cited by 338Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 247 of the 255 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories

Asterhan, Christa S. C., Schwarz, Baruch B.·2016·Educational Psychologist

DOI 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is increasing consensus among psycho-educational scholars about argumentation as a means to improve student knowledge and understanding of subject matter. In this article, we argue that, notwithstanding a strong theoretical rationale, causal evidence is not abundant, definitions of the objects of study (argumentation, learning) are often not well defined, and the variance in research methods is large. We argue that we systematically review the available research evidence by mapping it on the Argumentation For Learning research framework, which specifies the different antecedents, dialogue characteristics, and learning outcomes of argumentation. In doing so, we identify claims that are supported with substantive empirical evidence and demonstrate which questions are still open to further empirical examination. We also uncover several promising, relatively unexplored venues for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458

Cites

247 of 247 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491
Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind
Brookes, A.-L., Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1988) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.2307/1179565 · Cited by 4,916
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
Panagos, R. J. (1998) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259801900609 · Cited by 4,183
Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.328 · Cited by 4,161
Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3435 · Cited by 4,103
Talking science: language, learning, and values
Lemke, J. L. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 4,001
Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-000 · Cited by 3,468
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630

Show all 255 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Wagoner, M., & Nguyen, K. (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all (pp. 170–186). New York, NY: Guilford.
Asterhan, C. S. C., Butler, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). Goals for learning and interaction in argumentation and conceptual change. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) - Volume 1. Chicago IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
10.1080/10508406.1998.967205 · DOI
10.2307/1176776 · DOI
10.1348/000709907×268589 · DOI
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2014). Argue with me: Developing thinking and writing through dialog. Bronxville, NY: Wessex Press.
Sofer-Vital, S., Schwarz, B. B., & (2012). Achievement goals, argumentation and conceptual change in science. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Change. University of Trier, Germany.
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation: Critical reasoning and argumentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1348/000709908×380772 · DOI
10.2307/749877 · DOI

Sorted by citations

A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education
van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001 · Cited by 355
“Collaborative learning (CL) refers to instructional arrangements that involve two or more students working together on a shared learning goal (Asterhan & Schwarz, 2016; Dillenbourg, 1999; Gillies & Boyle, 2008).”
Background
Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda
Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5 · Cited by 218
An empirical analysis of knowledge co-construction in YouTube comments
Dubovi, I., & Tabak, I. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939 · Cited by 181
Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction
Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003 · Cited by 143
Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers
Hennessy, S., Howe, C. J., Mercer, N., & Vrikki, M. (2020) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404 · Cited by 154
Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues
Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21627 · Cited by 137
Beyond knowledge: Examining digital literacy's role in the acquisition of understanding in science
Greene, J. A., Copeland, D. Z., Deekens, V. M., & Yu, S. B. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.003 · Cited by 94
New data, old tensions: Big data, personalized learning, and the challenges of progressive education
Dishon, G. (2017) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878517735233 · Cited by 83
Teenage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through social network sites in secondary schools
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Bouton, E. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.007 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Learning by arguing
Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F. A., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.004 · Cited by 82
Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing
Bouton, E., Bar-Tal, S., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Metacognitive Skill Ability: Meta-Analysis on Biological Learning
Ramdani, D., Susilo, H., Suhadi, S., & Sueb, S. (2022) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607 · Cited by 118
Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking
Nussbaum, E. M. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173 · Cited by 103
Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: a Review of Instructional Approaches
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2 · Cited by 120
Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions
Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A., Allen, E., Baszczewski, S. E., Swearingen, A. E. D. V., Wei, L., & Butler, A. M. (2018) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21471 · Cited by 95
Public Understanding of Science
Sinatra, G. M., & Hofer, B. K. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732216656870 · Cited by 84
A Dialogic Path to Evidence-Based Argumentive Writing
Hemberger, L., Kuhn, D., Matos, F. A., & Shi, Y. (2017) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1336714 · Cited by 80
Mathematics teachers' attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation
Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2017) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.010 · Cited by 72
Conversational agents for academically productive talk: a comparison of directed and undirected agent interventions
Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Weinberger, A. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9246-2 · Cited by 71
Exploring enablers and inhibitors of productive peer argumentation: The role of individual achievement goals and of gender
Asterhan, C. S. C. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.05.002 · Cited by 62
Self-citation
Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: a case study in a geometry class
Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9276-z · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Using students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation
Chen, Y., & Qiao, X. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1813349 · Cited by 54
Learning to argue via apprenticeship
Papathomas, L. N., & Kuhn, D. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.013 · Cited by 53
The link between student‐perceived teacher talk and student enjoyment, anxiety and discursive engagement in the classroom
Chen, G., Zhang, J., Chan, C. K. K., Michaels, S., Resnick, L. Β., & Huang, X. (2020) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3600 · Cited by 61
An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse
Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925 · Cited by 64
Assessing Argumentation Using Machine Learning and Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling
Zhaı, X., Haudek, K. C., & Ma, W. (2022) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-022-10062-w · Cited by 51
Jigsaw teaching method for collaboration on cloud platforms
Chang, W., & Benson, V. (2020) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2020.1792332 · Cited by 55
Using critical questions to evaluate written and oral arguments in an undergraduate general education seminar: a quasi-experimental study
Nussbaum, E. M., Dove, I. J., Slife, N. M., Kardash, C. M., Turgut, R., & Vallett, D. (2018) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9848-3 · Cited by 49
Counter-Arguing During Curriculum-Supported Peer Interaction Facilitates Middle-School Students’ Science Content Knowledge
Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360 · Cited by 60
Characterising immersive argument-based inquiry learning environments in school-based education: a systematic literature review
Weiss, K. A., McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. M. (2021) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2021.1897931 · Cited by 48
Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in the Context of Dialogic Practice: A Question of Calibration?
Bråten, I., Muis, K. R., & Reznitskaya, A. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1341319 · Cited by 54
Collaborative learning in mathematics classrooms: Can teachers understand progress of concurrent collaborating groups?
Schwarz, B. B., Swidan, O., Prusak, N., & Palatnik, A. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104151 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: the role of reflection
Iordanou, K. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-021-09289-1 · Cited by 59
Capturing deliberative argument: An analytic coding scheme for studying argumentative dialogue and its benefits for learning
Felton, M., Crowell, A., Garcia-Mila, M., & Villarroel, C. (2022) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100350 · Cited by 46
Learning through explaining and engaging with others’ mathematical ideas
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Johnson, N. C., Ing, M. M., & Zimmerman, J. (2021) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2021.1990744 · Cited by 49
Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students' argumentation on socioscientific issues
Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., Checchi, K. D., & Munier, V. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21816 · Cited by 62
Mine, ours, and yours: Whose engagement and prior knowledge affects individual achievement from online collaborative learning?
Slof, B., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12466 · Cited by 43
Contemplating the Opposition: Does a Personal Touch Matter?
Iordanou, K., & Kuhn, D. (2019) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2019.1701918 · Cited by 40
Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?
Greco, S., Mehmeti, T., & Perret‐Clermont, A. (2017) · Journal of Argumentation in Context · doi:10.1075/jaic.6.2.04gre · Cited by 36
What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review
Baucal, A., Jošić, S. M., Stepanovic-Ilic, I., Videnović, M. P., Ivanović, J., & Krstić, K. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567 · Cited by 36
Don’t @ me: rethinking digital civility online and in school
Dishon, G., & Ben‐Porath, S. (2018) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1498353 · Cited by 36
To argue or not to argue? The role of personality traits, argumentativeness, epistemological beliefs and assigned positions for students’ participation in controversial political classroom discussions
Gronostay, D. (2018) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-018-00033-4 · Cited by 43
Long-Lasting Conceptual Change in Science Education
Li, X., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2021) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00288-x · Cited by 49
Text-Based Argumentation With Multiple Sources: A Descriptive Study of Opportunity to Learn in Secondary English Language Arts, History, and Science
Litman, C., Marple, S., Greenleaf, C. L., Charney‐Sirott, I., Bolz, M. J., Richardson, L. K., Hall, A., George, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2016) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1256809 · Cited by 39
The Impact of Collaboration Between Science and Religious Education Teachers on Their Understanding and Views of Argumentation
Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2022) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-022-10041-1 · Cited by 49
Quality Talk and dialogic teaching—an examination of a professional development programme on secondary teachers’ facilitation of student talk
Davies, M. J., Kiemer, K., & Meissel, K. (2017) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3293 · Cited by 43
Walton's types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences
Rapanta, C., & Christodoulou, A. (2019) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100352 · Cited by 39
Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review
Hendriks, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., Felton, M. K., Iordanou, K., Jucks, R., & Zimmermann, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572744 · Cited by 41
Feedback that corrects and contrasts students’ erroneous solutions with expert ones improves expository instruction for conceptual change
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Dotan, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Refutation texts and argumentation for conceptual change: A winning or a redundant combination?
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Resnick, M. S. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101265 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Mateos, M., Granado-Peinado, M., & Martín, E. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09548-3 · Cited by 29
The Argumentation Rating Tool: Assessing and supporting teacher facilitation and student argumentation during text-based discussions
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103464 · Cited by 37
‘More is not necessarily better’: curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge
Larrain, A. S., Howe, C. J., & Freire, P. (2017) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1408581 · Cited by 28
Is There a Right Way? Productive Patterns of Interaction during Collaborative Problem Solving
Webb, N. M., Ing, M. M., Burnheimer, E., Johnson, N. C., Franke, M. L., & Zimmerman, J. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11050214 · Cited by 42
Deliberative emotional talk
Slakmon, B., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09304-3 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Group-work discussions and content knowledge gains: Argumentative inner speech as the missing link?
Larrain, A. S. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.002 · Cited by 27
The relationship between teacher talk and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis
Yang, T., & Chen, G. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100638 · Cited by 52
Collaborative writing as a bridge from peer discourse to individual argumentative writing
Matos, F. A. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10117-2 · Cited by 26
Argumentation and concept development: the role of imagination
Larraín, A. (2016) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-016-0316-7 · Cited by 31
Deliberative Teaching as an Emergent Field: The Challenge of Articulating Diverse Research Agendas to Promote Educational Experiences for Citizenship
Larrain, A. S., Fortes, G., & Rojas, M. T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660825 · Cited by 25
Supporting student agency in science
Cavagnetto, A. R., Hand, B. M., & Premo, J. (2019) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2019.1702392 · Cited by 25
Capturing Temporal and Sequential Patterns of Socio-Emotional Interaction in High- and Low-Performing Collaborative Argumentation Groups
Gao, L., Li, X., Li, Y., & Hu, W. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-022-00698-7 · Cited by 24
Exploring college students’ depth and processing patterns of critical thinking skills and their perception in argument map(AM)-supported online group debate activities
Chen, X., Zhao, H., Jin, H.-Y., & Li, Y. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101467 · Cited by 24
Curriculum materials support teachers in the promotion of argumentation in science teaching: A case study
Larrain, A. S., Moreno, C., Grau, V., Freire, P., Salvat, I., López, P., & Silva, M. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.018 · Cited by 24
The impact of collaborative learning approaches on assessment outcomes in an accounting theory class
Nsor-Ambala, R. (2021) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2021.1944232 · Cited by 26
The Challenge of Position-Taking in Novice Higher Education Students’ Argumentative Writing
Kleemola, K., Hyytinen, H., & Toom, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.885987 · Cited by 33
More socio-emotional regulation, more effective? Exploring social regulation of learning in collaborative argumentation among the high and low performing groups
Li, X., Li, Y., Hu, W., Li, K., & Gao, L. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09329-4 · Cited by 26
Explorative mathematical argumentation: a theoretical framework for identifying and analysing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning
Reuter, F. (2023) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-022-10199-5 · Cited by 22
Professional development in classroom discussion to improve argumentation: Teacher and student outcomes
Wilkinson, I. A. G., Reznitskaya, A., & D’Agostino, J. V. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101732 · Cited by 25
Professional development programs to improve science teachers’ skills in the facilitation of argumentation in science classroom—a systematic review
Wess, R., Priemer, B., & Parchmann, I. (2023) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-023-00076-3 · Cited by 35
Examining the interdependence in the growth of students' language and argument competencies in replicative and generative learning environments
Çikmaz, A., Fulmer, G. W., Yaman, F., & Hand, B. M. (2021) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21715 · Cited by 20
Dialogic teaching of controversial public issues in a Chinese middle school
Shi, Y., Shen, X., Tao, W., Cheng, L., & Wang, A. (2021) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100533 · Cited by 25
Learning science through argumentative synthesis writing and deliberative dialogues: a comprehensive and effective methodology in secondary education
Casado-Ledesma, L., Cuevas, I. M. A., & Ortega, E. M. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10191-0 · Cited by 33
Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations
Ayalon, M., Wilkie, K. J., & Eid, K. H. (2021) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-021-10121-5 · Cited by 22
Using Critical Integrative Argumentation to Assess Socioscientific Argumentation across Decision-Making Contexts
Sparks, R. A., Jimenez, P. C., Kirby, C. K., & Dauer, J. M. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12100644 · Cited by 20
Effects of formative feedback on argumentative writing in English and cross-linguistic transfer to German
Peltzer, K., Lorca, A. L., Krause, U.-M., & Busse, V. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101935 · Cited by 20
Building arguments: key to collaborative scaffolding
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., Marroquín, M. S. R., Gleisner, S., & Marquinez, J. T. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1333010 · Cited by 22
Leveraging social networking sites for knowledge co-construction: Positive effects of argumentation structure, but premature knowledge consolidation after individual preparation
Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.004 · Cited by 20
Appeals to Science: Recirculation of Online Claims in Socioscientific Reasoning
Solli, A. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09878-w · Cited by 19
Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system
Garshasbi, S., Yecies, B., & Shen, J. (2021) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2021016 · Cited by 29
Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics
Hähkiöniemi, M., Hiltunen, J., Jokiranta, K., Kilpelä, J., Lehesvuori, S., & Nieminen, P. (2022) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100608 · Cited by 24
The Effect of Peer-Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge
Larrain, A. S., Freire, P., Grau, V., López, P., Salvat, I., Silva, M., & Gastellu, V. (2018) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cad.20263 · Cited by 18
Is epistemic orientation the chicken or the egg in professional development for knowledge generation approaches?
Lammert, C., Suh, J. K., Hand, B. M., & Fulmer, G. W. (2022) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103747 · Cited by 17
The intersection of gender and culture in argumentative writing
Tsemach, E., & Zohar, A. E. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1894499 · Cited by 17
An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts
Martins, M. R., & Macagno, F. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21708 · Cited by 21
Examining pre-service science teachers’ development and utilization of written and oral argument and representation resources in an argument-based inquiry environment
Yaman, F., & Hand, B. M. (2022) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d2rp00152g · Cited by 16
Exploring changes in mathematics teachers' envisioning of potential argumentation situations in the classroom
Ayalon, M. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.019 · Cited by 16
Constructed dialogs reveal skill development in argumentive writing
Shi, Y. (2020) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-020-10045-1 · Cited by 17
Systematically reviewing the potential of scientific argumentation to promote multidimensional conceptual change in science education
Li, X., Wang, W., & Li, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2022.2070787 · Cited by 32
Strengthening science education through attention to student resources: A conceptualization of socioscientific capital
Klaver, L. T., Sins, P. H. M., van der Molen, J. H. W., & Guérin, L. J. F. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21827 · Cited by 16
Classroom interaction and student learning: Reasoned dialogue versus reasoned opposition
Howe, C. J. (2023) · Dialogic Pedagogy A Journal for Studies of Dialogic Education · doi:10.5195/dpj.2023.549 · Cited by 15
Teacher collaborative inquiry into practice in school-based learning communities: The role of activity type
Babichenko, M., Lefstein, A., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2024) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100852 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
The role of collaborative argumentation in future teachers' selection of online information
Zimmermann, M., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000307 · Cited by 15
Writing about the past: the impact of different authentic instructional material on students’ argument writing in history
Mierwald, M., Lehmann, T., & Brauch, N. (2021) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-021-00541-5 · Cited by 15
Collaborative writing of argumentative syntheses by low-performing undergraduate writers: explicit instruction and practice
Granado-Peinado, M., Cuevas, I., Olmos, R., Martín, E., Casado-Ledesma, L., & Mateos, M. (2023) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-022-10318-x · Cited by 14
Disagreeing softly: Supporting students in managing disagreement in peer critique
Zhou, J., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Ryan, Z., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Danish, J. A., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09438-z · Cited by 14
Secondary school music education students’ perception of technology-assisted cooperative learning ( Percepción del alumnado de música de educación secundaria sobre el aprendizaje cooperativo asistido por tecnología )
Herrera, J. P. (2021) · Culture and Education · doi:10.1080/11356405.2020.1859737 · Cited by 14
Oral Argumentation Skills between Process and Product
Luginbühl, M., & Müller-Feldmeth, D. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7020139 · Cited by 14
The impact of working memory capacity on collaborative learning in elementary school students
Du, X., Chen, C., & Lin, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027523 · Cited by 21
Secondary school mathematics teacher-perceived factors involved in argumentation: an emerging framework
Ayalon, M., & Nama, S. (2023) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2022.2156585 · Cited by 14

Authors: Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B.
Affiliations: Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author: Asterhan, Christa S. C.
ORCID: Asterhan, Christa S. C.
Schwarz, Baruch B.
Venue: Educational Psychologist
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2016-04-02
Volume: 51
Issue: 2
Pages: 164-187
ISSN: 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
1532-6985
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
OpenAlex: W2314714283
Cited by: 338
References: 255
Citations by year: 2026: 43 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 5
FWCI: 46.69
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords: argumentation, dialogue, learning outcomes, research framework, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks