Cited by 46Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesScience Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Capturing deliberative argument: An analytic coding scheme for studying argumentative dialogue and its benefits for learning

Felton, Mark, Crowell, Amanda, Garcia-Mila, Merce, Villarroel, Constanza·2022·Learning, Culture and Social Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100350

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Successful performance in an argumentative synthesis task requires exploring both sides of the topic to reconcile positions and reach an integrative well-founded conclusion, as in effective deliberative dialogue.

    “Successful performance in an argumentative synthesis task implies, as in an effective deliberative dialogue (Felton et al., 2019), exploring both sides of the topic, in order to reconcile the positions, and reaching an integrative well-founded conclusion.”
  • There is evidence of better argumentative reasoning quality when students collaborate towards a common solution rather than try to convince others.

    “There is evidence of a better quality of argumentative reasoning when students are asked to collaborate towards a common solution, rather than to convince others that their idea is better (Felton et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felton, M., Crowell, A., Garcia-Mila, M., & Villarroel, C.
Affiliations
  • San Jose State University (US)
  • Hunter College (US)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Felton, Mark
Venue
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
36
Pages
100350
ISSN
2210-6561 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981696515
Cited by
46
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Learning Culture and Social Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Social Fund (EDU/3600/2006)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (APIF2013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
argumentative dialogue, coding scheme, argumentative discourse, consensus seeking, persuasive arguments, argumentation in education, collaborative argumentation, learning outcomes, reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review