The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific assessment of animal welfare
Abstract
Animal welfare is a state within the animal and a scientific perspective provides methodologies for evidence-based assessment of an animal's welfare. A simplistic definition of animal welfare might be how the animal feels now. Affective experiences including emotions, are subjective states so cannot be measured directly in animals, but there are informative indirect physiological and behavioural indices that can be cautiously used to interpret such experiences. This review enunciates several key science-based frameworks for understanding animal welfare. The biological functioning and affective state frameworks were initially seen as competing, but a recent more unified approach is that biological functioning is taken to include affective experiences and affective experiences are recognised as products of biological functioning, and knowledge of the dynamic interactions between the two is considered to be fundamental to managing and improving animal welfare. The value of these two frameworks in understanding the welfare of group-housed sows is reviewed. The majority of studies of the welfare of group-housed sows have employed the biological functioning framework to infer compromised sow welfare, on the basis that suboptimal biological functioning accompanies negative affective states such as sow hunger, pain, fear, helplessness, frustration and anger. Group housing facilitates social living, but group housing of gestating sows raises different welfare considerations to stall h…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, aggression can compromise welfare if it results in injury [50] and has also been widely associated with physiological stress [47,51].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, exploratory, play and affiliative behaviours have been used as indicators of positive welfare states [45,47].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans.
Panksepp, J. (2005) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004 · Cited by 1,217
Broom, D. M. (1986) · British Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0 · Cited by 970
Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., & Paul, E. S. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023 · Cited by 809
Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare.
Moberg, G. P. (2000) · The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. · doi:10.1079/9780851993591.0001 · Cited by 768
The neurobiology of positive emotions
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001 · Cited by 677
(2010) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845936730.0000 · Cited by 477
‘Pleasures’,'Pains’ and Animal Welfare: Toward a Natural History of Affect
Fraser, D., & Duncan, I. J. H. (1998) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600020935 · Cited by 335
Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings
Kirkden, R. D., & Pajor, E. A. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.009 · Cited by 334
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- *Barnett JL. Modifying the design of group pens with individual feeding places affects the welfare of pigs. In: Bottcher RW, Hoff SJ (eds). Livestock Environment V, Volume II. Pp 613–18. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA, 1997
- *Barnett JL. Studying stress to assess animal welfare. In: Paterson JE (eds). Manipulating Pig Production IX. Pp 107–20. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Australia, 2003
- *Brambell FWR, Barbour DS, Barnett MB, Ewer TK, Hobson A, Pitchforth H, Smith WR, Thorpe WH, Winship FJW. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, United Kingdom, 1965
- Dantzer, R. Les émotions. P 21. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1988
- *Marchant-Forde JN, Marchant-Forde RM. Minimizing inter-pig aggression during mixing. Pig News and Information 26, 63N–71N, 2005
- *Nicholson RI, McGlone JJ, Reid LN. Quantification of stress in sows: comparison of individual housing versus social penning. Journal of Animal Science 71 (Suppl. 1), 112, 1993
- *Stevens B, Barnett JL, Tilbrook AJ, Hemsworth PH. Effects of deprivation of a preferred resource (feed or social contact) on the biological functioning of pigs. In: van Barneveld RJ (eds). Manipulating Pig Production XII. P 28. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, 2009
- *Taylor IA, Barnett JL, Cronin GM. Optimum group size for pigs. In: Bottcher RW, Hoff SJ (eds). Livestock Environment V, Volume II. Pp 965–71. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA, 1997
- *Turner AI, Keating C, Tilbrook AJ. Sex differences and the role of sex steroids in sympatho-adrenal medullary system the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis responses to stress. In: Kahn SM (eds). Sex Steroids. Pp 115–36. In Tech Publishing, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare
Mellor, D. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Littlewood, K. E., McLean, A. N., McGreevy, P. D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10101870 · Cited by 985
Self-citationUpdating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”
Mellor, D. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6030021 · Cited by 948
Self-citationConsumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
de la Varga, M. A., Montaña, J. R. G., & Pérez, J. M. L. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10030385 · Cited by 607
Mellor, D. J. (2017) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani7080060 · Cited by 471
Self-citationThe visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in animal farming: A systematic literature review
Bao, J., & Xie, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129956 · Cited by 210
Mellor, D. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6100059 · Cited by 186
Self-citationINVITED REVIEW: The usefulness of measuring glucocorticoids for assessing animal welfare
Ralph, C. R., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-9645 · Cited by 179
Self-citationA review on computer vision systems in monitoring of poultry: A welfare perspective
Okinda, C., Nyalala, I., Korohou, T., Okinda, C., Wang, J., Achieng, T., Wamalwa, P., Mang, T., & Shen, M. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.aiia.2020.09.002 · Cited by 179
Costs and Benefits of Improving Farm Animal Welfare
Fernandes, J. N., Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11020104 · Cited by 147
Self-citationA “How-To” Guide for Designing Judgment Bias Studies to Assess Captive Animal Welfare
Bethell, E. (2015) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833 · Cited by 155
The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems
Hartcher, K., & Jones, B. (2017) · World s Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1017/s0043933917000812 · Cited by 129
Mellor, D. J. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9070440 · Cited by 144
Self-citationReview of different methods used for clinical recognition and assessment of pain in dogs and cats
Hernández-Ávalos, I., Mota‐Rojas, D., Mora‐Medina, P., Martı́nez-Burnes, J., Casas-Alvarado, A., Verduzco-Mendoza, A., Lezama-García, K., & Olmos-Hernández, A. S. (2019) · International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine · doi:10.1080/23144599.2019.1680044 · Cited by 108
Beausoleil, N. J., Mellor, D. J., Baker, L., Baker, S. E., Bellio, M., Clarke, A. S., Dale, A. R., Garlick, S., Jones, B., Harvey, A. M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00296 · Cited by 104
Self-citationBenn, A. L., McLelland, D. J., & Whittaker, A. L. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9010027 · Cited by 98
In pursuit of peak animal welfare; the need to prioritize the meaningful over the measurable
Veasey, J. S. (2017) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21390 · Cited by 100
The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens
Singh, C., Verdon, M., Cronin, G. M., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2016) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731116002573 · Cited by 83
Self-citationCobb, M., Otto, C. M., & Fine, A. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.666898 · Cited by 89
Losada-Espinosa, N., Villarroel, M., María, G. A., & la Lama, G. C. M. (2017) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.12.004 · Cited by 78
Sommerville, R., Brown, A. F., & Upjohn, M. M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192354 · Cited by 76
Comparative study on poultry target tracking algorithms based on a deep regression network
Fang, C., Huang, J., Cuan, K., Zhuang, X., & Zhang, T. (2020) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.002 · Cited by 75
Marco‐Ramell, A., de Almeida, A. M., Cristóbal, S., Rodrigues, P. M., Roncada, P., & Bassols, A. (2016) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c5mb00788g · Cited by 73
Kumar, P., Ahmed, M. A., Abubakar, A. A., Hayat, M. N., Kaka, U., Ajat, M., Goh, Y. M., & Sazili, A. Q. (2022) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.109048 · Cited by 74
Optimal marine mammal welfare under human care: Current efforts and future directions
Brando, S. I. C. A., Broom, D. M., Acasuso-Rivero, C., & Clark, F. E. (2017) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.011 · Cited by 74
Cognitive Bias in Zoo Animals: An Optimistic Outlook for Welfare Assessment
Clegg, I. L. K. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8070104 · Cited by 71
Littlewood, K. E., Heslop, M. V., & Cobb, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869 · Cited by 85
A critical review of advancement in scientific research on food animal welfare-related air pollution
Ni, J. Q., Erasmus, M. A., Croney, C., Li, C., & Li, Y. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124468 · Cited by 63
Dilemmas for Natural Living Concepts of Zoo Animal Welfare
Learmonth, M. J. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060318 · Cited by 62
The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
Acharya, R. Y., Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., & Kinder, J. E. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12040487 · Cited by 62
Self-citationEnvironmental complexity positively impacts affective states of broiler chickens
Anderson, M. G., Campbell, A. M., Crump, A., Arnott, G., & Jacobs, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95280-4 · Cited by 54
Learmonth, M. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10050901 · Cited by 60
Addressing Animal Welfare through Collaborative Stakeholder Networks
Fernandes, J. N., Blache, D., Maloney, S. K., Martin, G. B., Venus, B. K., Walker, F. R., Head, B. W., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2019) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture9060132 · Cited by 56
Self-citationHemsworth, P. H. (2018) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an17897 · Cited by 50
Self-citationA bibliometric analysis of past and emergent trends in animal welfare science
Freire, R., & Nicol, C. J. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.4.465 · Cited by 57
Su, B., Koda, N., & Martens, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190781 · Cited by 54
Simitzis, P., Tzanidakis, C., Tzamaloukas, O., & Sossidou, E. (2021) · Dairy · doi:10.3390/dairy3010002 · Cited by 53
Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space
Widowski, T. M., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., & Rault, J. (2016) · World s Poultry Science Journal · doi:10.1017/s0043933916000027 · Cited by 48
Self-citationHormones, stress and the welfare of animals
Tilbrook, A. J., & Ralph, C. R. (2017) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an16808 · Cited by 48
Self-citationGlanville, C. R., Abraham, C., & Coleman, G. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122333 · Cited by 50
Conducting Behavioural Research in the Zoo: A Guide to Ten Important Methods, Concepts and Theories
Rose, P. E., & Riley, L. M. (2021) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg2030031 · Cited by 47
Capturing wild animal welfare: a physiological perspective
Beaulieu, M. (2023) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13009 · Cited by 51
A model curriculum for the study of animal welfare in colleges and schools of veterinary medicine
_, _., Lord, L. K., Millman, S. T., Carbone, L. G., Cook, N. B., Fisher, A. D., McKeegan, D. E. F., Morton, D. B., Pajor, E. A., Peralta, J. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.250.6.632 · Cited by 44
Forensic Use of the Five Domains Model for Assessing Suffering in Cases of Animal Cruelty
Ledger, R. A., & Mellor, D. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8070101 · Cited by 46
Self-citationCompetence to thrive: resilience as an indicator of positive health and positive welfare in animals
Colditz, I. G. (2022) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an22061 · Cited by 52
Beggs, D. S., Jongman, E. C., Hemsworth, P. H., & Fisher, A. D. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-14847 · Cited by 43
Self-citationClegg, I. L. K., Rödel, H. G., Mercera, B., Vanderheul, S., Schrijvers, T., de Laender, P., Gojceta, R., Zimmitti, M., Verhoeven, E., Burger, J., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02112 · Cited by 41
Raw, Z., Rodrigues, J. B., Rickards, K. J., Ryding, J., Norris, S. L., Judge, A., Kubasiewicz, L. M., Watson, T. L., Little, H., Hart, B., et al. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10020297 · Cited by 43
Beausoleil, N. J. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10020257 · Cited by 40
‘More than a feeling’: An empirical investigation of hedonistic accounts of animal welfare
Robbins, J., Franks, B., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193864 · Cited by 36
Effects of stage of gestation at mixing on aggression, injuries and stress in sows
Stevens, B. H., Karlen, G., Morrison, R. S., Gonyou, H. W., Butler, K. L., Kerswell, K. J., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2015) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.002 · Cited by 38
Self-citationVeasey, J. S. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10010039 · Cited by 36
The effects of floor space and nest box access on the physiology and behavior of caged laying hens
Engel, J. M., Widowski, T. M., Tilbrook, A. J., Butler, K. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2018) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps/pey378 · Cited by 36
Self-citationMellor, D. J., & Burns, M. (2020) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2020.1715900 · Cited by 45
Self-citationRaspa, F., Tarantola, M., Bergero, D., Nery, J., Visconti, A., Mastrazzo, C. M., Cavallini, D., Valvassori, E., & Valle, E. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10081334 · Cited by 36
Welfare of beef cattle in Australian feedlots: a review of the risks and measures
Salvin, H. E., Lees, A. M., Cafe, L. M., Colditz, I. G., & Lee, C. (2020) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an19621 · Cited by 35
Individual variation in sow aggressive behavior and its relationship with sow welfare1
Verdon, M., Morrison, R. S., Rice, M., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0006 · Cited by 34
Self-citationFarmers’ perception of aggression between growing pigs
Camerlink, I., & Turner, S. P. (2016) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.009 · Cited by 34
Aggression in group housed sows and fattening pigs
Verdon, M., & Rault, J. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00006-x · Cited by 32
Miller, S. L., Serpell, J. A., Dalton, K. R., Waite, K. B., Morris, D. O., Redding, L. E., Dreschel, N. A., & Davis, M. F. (2022) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.844252 · Cited by 45
Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model
Littlewood, K. E., & Mellor, D. J. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6090058 · Cited by 35
Self-citationNatural behaviours, their drivers and their implications for laying hen welfare
Hemsworth, P. H., & Edwards, L. E. (2020) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an19630 · Cited by 30
Self-citationObservational behaviors and emotions to assess welfare of dogs: A systematic review
de Winkel, T., van der Steen, S., Enders‐Slegers, M., Griffioen, R. E., Haverbeke, A., Groenewoud, D., & Hediger, K. (2024) · Journal of Veterinary Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.007 · Cited by 32
An animal welfare syllabus for wildlife tourism
Fennell, D. A., Coose, S., & Moorhouse, T. P. (2022) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2022.2142597 · Cited by 31
Talbot, S. R., Struve, B., Wassermann, L., Heider, M., Weegh, N., Knape, T., Hofmann, M. C. J., von Knethen, A., Jirkof, P., Häger, C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.937711 · Cited by 27
Webster, J., Schütz, K. E., Sutherland, M. A., Stewart, M., & Mellor, D. J. (2014) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2014.958117 · Cited by 31
Self-citationBehavioural analysis of captive tigers (Panthera tigris): A water pool makes the difference
Biolatti, C., Modesto, P., Dezzutto, D., Pera, F., Tarantola, M., Gennero, M. S., Maurella, C., & Acutis, P. L. (2015) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.017 · Cited by 27
Learmonth, M. J., Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2020) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21585 · Cited by 26
Self-citationAttention Bias Test Measures Negative But Not Positive Affect in Sheep: A Replication Study
Monk, J. E., Lee, C., Dickson, E. J., & Campbell, D. L. M. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10081314 · Cited by 26
Truelove, M. A., Martin, J., Langford, F. M., & Leach, M. C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77437-9 · Cited by 26
Relationship between Range Use and Fearfulness in Free-Range Hens from Different Rearing Enrichments
Bari, M. S., Allen, S. S., Mesken, J., Cohen-Barnhouse, A. M., & Campbell, D. L. M. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11020300 · Cited by 25
What can kinematics tell us about the affective states of animals?
Guesgen, M. J., & Bench, C. (2017) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.26.4.383 · Cited by 22
Caulfield, M. P., & Padula, M. P. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10050821 · Cited by 24
Glatz, P. C., & Underwood, G. J. (2020) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an19673 · Cited by 24
Tail Docking of Piglets 1: Stress Response of Piglets to Tail Docking
Morrison, R. S., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10091701 · Cited by 23
Self-citationSchulz, M., Zieglowski, L., Kopaczka, M., & Tolba, R. H. (2022) · European Surgical Research · doi:10.1159/000525680 · Cited by 22
A New Framework for Assessing Equid Welfare: A Case Study of Working Equids in Nepalese Brick Kilns
Norris, S. L., Kubasiewicz, L. M., Watson, T. L., Little, H. A., Yadav, A. K., Thapa, S., Raw, Z., & Burden, F. A. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10061074 · Cited by 21
Narayan, E. J., Barreto, M. O., Hantzopoulou, G.-C., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11051287 · Cited by 21
Self-citationJones, M., Gartland, K. N., & Fuller, G. A. (2021) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.08.04.06.2021 · Cited by 20
Our Ethical and Moral Responsibility: Ensuring the Welfare of Therapy Animals
Ng, Z., Fine, A. H., Peralta, J. M., Tedeschi, P. J., & Albright, J. D. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22346-4.00016-0 · Cited by 21
Hemsworth, P. H., Morrison, R. S., Tilbrook, A. J., Butler, K. L., Rice, M., & Moeller, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016-0583 · Cited by 20
Self-citationModern Pig Production: Aspects of Animal Welfare, Sustainability and Circular Bioeconomy
Sossidou, E. Ν., Banias, G., Batsioula, M., Termatzidou, S.-A., Simitzis, P., Patsios, S. I., & Broom, D. M. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17115184 · Cited by 26
A biological integrity framework for describing animal welfare and wellbeing
Colditz, I. G. (2023) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an22285 · Cited by 20
Ethical Considerations for Echinoderms: New Initiatives in Welfare
Crespi-Abril, A. C., & Rubilar, T. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13213377 · Cited by 22
Clay, A. W., Bard, K. A., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (2017) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.06.011 · Cited by 19
Boys, R. M., Beausoleil, N. J., Pawley, M. D. M., Betty, E. L., & Stockin, K. A. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12141861 · Cited by 18
The effect of shade on sheep grazing pasture during summer conditions
Knight, M. I., Linden, N. P., Butler, K. L., Rice, M., Ponnampalam, E. N., Behrendt, R., & Jongman, E. C. (2023) · Journal of Veterinary Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2023.05.005 · Cited by 18
Beausoleil, N. J., Swanson, J. C., McKeegan, D. E. F., & Croney, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2023.1042733 · Cited by 23
Finding biomarkers of experience in animals
Babington, S., Tilbrook, A. J., Maloney, S. K., Fernandes, J. N., Crowley, T. M., Ding, L., Fox, A. H., Zhang, S., Kho, E. A., Cozzolino, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00989-z · Cited by 25
Self-citationEnglefield, B., Blackman, S. A., Starling, M. J., & McGreevy, P. D. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060335 · Cited by 21
Turpin, D. L., Langendijk, P., Chen, T., Lines, D. S., & Pluske, J. R. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6030024 · Cited by 17
A Review of the Monitoring Techniques Used to Detect Oestrus in Sows
Glencorse, D., Grupen, C. G., & Bathgate, R. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15030331 · Cited by 16
Automatic tracking of the dairy goat in the surveillance video
Su, Q., Tang, J., Zhai, J., Sun, Y., & He, D. (2021) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106254 · Cited by 16
Greenwood, E. C., Wettere, W. H. E. J. V., Rayner, J., Hughes, P. E., & Plush, K. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9010008 · Cited by 16
Fogarty, E. S., Swain, D., Cronin, G. M., & Trotter, M. G. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.4.407 · Cited by 17
Self-citationZieliński, D. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13061111 · Cited by 15
Tail Docking of Piglets 2: Effects of Meloxicam on the Stress Response to Tail Docking
Morrison, R. S., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10091699 · Cited by 14
Self-citationWiese, T. R., Rey, S., Betancor, M. B., Haskell, M. J., Jarvis, S., Davie, A., Wemelsfelder, F., & Turnbull, J. F. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1260090 · Cited by 15
Plugging biologging into animal welfare: An opportunity for advancing wild animal welfare science
Beaulieu, M., & Masilkova, M. (2024) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14441 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemsworth, P., Mellor, D., Cronin, G., & Tilbrook, A.
- Affiliations
- Animal Welfare Science Centre, University of Melbourne
- Massey University (NZ)
- Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney
- Venue
- New Zealand Veterinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-30
- ISSN
- 0048-0169 (ISSN-L)
- 1176-0710
- OpenAlex
- W2050156844
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Zealand Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- animal welfare assessment, gestating sows, feeding competition, welfare indicators
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Behavior, Animal, Housing, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review