The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scientific assessment of animal welfare
Abstract
Animal welfare is a state within the animal and a scientific perspective provides methodologies for evidence-based assessment of an animal's welfare. A simplistic definition of animal welfare might be how the animal feels now. Affective experiences including emotions, are subjective states so cannot be measured directly in animals, but there are informative indirect physiological and behavioural indices that can be cautiously used to interpret such experiences. This review enunciates several key science-based frameworks for understanding animal welfare. The biological functioning and affective state frameworks were initially seen as competing, but a recent more unified approach is that biological functioning is taken to include affective experiences and affective experiences are recognised as products of biological functioning, and knowledge of the dynamic interactions between the two is considered to be fundamental to managing and improving animal welfare. The value of these two frameworks in understanding the welfare of group-housed sows is reviewed. The majority of studies of the welfare of group-housed sows have employed the biological functioning framework to infer compromised sow welfare, on the basis that suboptimal biological functioning accompanies negative affective states such as sow hunger, pain, fear, helplessness, frustration and anger. Group housing facilitates social living, but group housing of gestating sows raises different welfare considerations to stall h…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, aggression can compromise welfare if it results in injury [50] and has also been widely associated with physiological stress [47,51].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, exploratory, play and affiliative behaviours have been used as indicators of positive welfare states [45,47].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482
Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare
Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. J., Winckler, C., Forkman, B., Dimitrov, I., Langbein, J., et al. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003 · Cited by 1,486
Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans.
Panksepp, J. (2005) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004 · Cited by 1,217
Broom, D. M. (1986) · British Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0 · Cited by 970
Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., & Paul, E. S. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023 · Cited by 809
Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare.
Moberg, G. P. (2000) · The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare. · doi:10.1079/9780851993591.0001 · Cited by 768
The neurobiology of positive emotions
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001 · Cited by 677
(2010) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781845936730.0000 · Cited by 472
‘Pleasures’,'Pains’ and Animal Welfare: Toward a Natural History of Affect
Fraser, D., & Duncan, I. J. H. (1998) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600020935 · Cited by 335
Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings
Kirkden, R. D., & Pajor, E. A. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.009 · Cited by 334
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- *Barnett JL. Modifying the design of group pens with individual feeding places affects the welfare of pigs. In: Bottcher RW, Hoff SJ (eds). Livestock Environment V, Volume II. Pp 613–18. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA, 1997
- *Barnett JL. Studying stress to assess animal welfare. In: Paterson JE (eds). Manipulating Pig Production IX. Pp 107–20. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Australia, 2003
- *Brambell FWR, Barbour DS, Barnett MB, Ewer TK, Hobson A, Pitchforth H, Smith WR, Thorpe WH, Winship FJW. Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, United Kingdom, 1965
- Dantzer, R. Les émotions. P 21. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1988
- *Marchant-Forde JN, Marchant-Forde RM. Minimizing inter-pig aggression during mixing. Pig News and Information 26, 63N–71N, 2005
- *Nicholson RI, McGlone JJ, Reid LN. Quantification of stress in sows: comparison of individual housing versus social penning. Journal of Animal Science 71 (Suppl. 1), 112, 1993
- *Stevens B, Barnett JL, Tilbrook AJ, Hemsworth PH. Effects of deprivation of a preferred resource (feed or social contact) on the biological functioning of pigs. In: van Barneveld RJ (eds). Manipulating Pig Production XII. P 28. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, 2009
- *Taylor IA, Barnett JL, Cronin GM. Optimum group size for pigs. In: Bottcher RW, Hoff SJ (eds). Livestock Environment V, Volume II. Pp 965–71. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, Michigan, USA, 1997
- *Turner AI, Keating C, Tilbrook AJ. Sex differences and the role of sex steroids in sympatho-adrenal medullary system the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis responses to stress. In: Kahn SM (eds). Sex Steroids. Pp 115–36. In Tech Publishing, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The 2020 five domains model: including human-animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare
Mellor, D. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Littlewood, K. E., McLean, A. N., McGreevy, P. D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10101870 · Cited by 985
Self-citationUpdating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”
Mellor, D. (2016) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani6030021 · Cited by 948
Self-citationConsumers’ Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
de la Varga, M. A., Montaña, J. R. G., & Pérez, J. M. L. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10030385 · Cited by 607
Mellor, D. J. (2017) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani7080060 · Cited by 471
Self-citationThe visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemsworth, P., Mellor, D., Cronin, G., & Tilbrook, A.
- Affiliations
- Animal Welfare Science Centre, University of Melbourne
- Massey University (NZ)
- Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney
- Venue
- New Zealand Veterinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-30
- ISSN
- 0048-0169 (ISSN-L)
- 1176-0710
- OpenAlex
- W2050156844
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Zealand Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- animal welfare assessment, gestating sows, feeding competition, welfare indicators
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Behavior, Animal, Housing, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
