The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers
Abstract
A survey of individuals working in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, queer, or asexual (LGTBQA) was administered online in 2013. Participants completed a 58-item questionnaire to report their professional areas of expertise, levels of education, geographic location, and gender and sexual identities and rated their work and social communities as welcoming or hostile to queer identities. An analysis of 1,427 responses to this survey provided the first broad portrait of this population, and it revealed trends related to workplace practices that can inform efforts to improve queer inclusivity in STEM workplaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meyer, I. H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 · Cited by 14,736
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Minority Stress and Mental Health in Gay Men
Meyer, I. H. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137286 · Cited by 4,264 · cited 2×
“However, a perceived or actual need to conceal one’s identity can contribute to stress and negative mental health outcomes (Meyer, 1995, 2003; Pachankis, 2007) and can strain social relationships (Ullrich et al., 2003).”
BackgroundOng, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2 · Cited by 974
Out of Sight But Not Out of Mind: Managing Invisible Social Identities in the Workplace
Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & Maclean, T. L. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281431 · Cited by 866
Ragins, B. R. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27752724 · Cited by 666
Major selection and persistence for women in STEM
Shapiro, C. A., & Sax, L. J. (2011) · New Directions for Institutional Research · doi:10.1002/ir.404 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM
Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe0933 · Cited by 319
Marin‐Spiotta, E., Diaz‐Vallejo, E. J., Barnes, R. T., Mattheis, A., Schneider, B., Berhe, A. A., Hastings, M. G., Williams, B. M., & Magley, V. (2023) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef002912 · Cited by 48
Self-citationVisible name changes promote inequity for transgender researchers
Gaskins, L. C., & McClain, C. R. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001104 · Cited by 27
Pillis, D., Pataranutaporn, P., Maes, P., & Sra, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645213 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Homosexuality
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0091-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-3602
- OpenAlex
- W1515231690
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
- The paper
- Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A. (2016). Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. Journal of Homosexuality. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
