Cited by 20Body Composition Measurement TechniquesPhysical Education and Training StudiesPhysical Activity and Health

Skinfold Measurement: Which Caliper? How Much Training?

Lohman, Timothy G., Pollock, Michael L.·1981·Journal of Physical Education and Recreation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00971170.1981.10629017

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lohman, T. G., & Pollock, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Education and Recreation
Published
1981-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
27-29
ISSN
0097-1170 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1597847440
Cited by
20
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Physical Education and Recreation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
skinfold thickness, measurement methods, body composition assessment, anthropometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review