Cited by 66Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSocial Work Education and Practice

A pilot feasibility study of virtual patient simulation to enhance social work students’ brief mental health assessment skills

Washburn, Micki, Bordnick, Patrick, Rizzo, Albert “Skip”·2016·Social Work in Health Care

Abstract

This study presents preliminary feasibility and acceptability data on the use of virtual patient (VP) simulations to develop brief assessment skills within an interdisciplinary care setting. Results support the acceptability of technology-enhanced simulations and offer preliminary evidence for an association between engagement in VP practice simulations and improvements in diagnostic accuracy and clinical interviewing skills. Recommendations and next steps for research on technology-enhanced simulations within social work are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00981389.2016.1210715

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most frequently raised issue with conversational agents (9 studies) was poor understanding because of limited vocabulary, voice recognition accuracy, or error management of word inputs.

    “The most frequently raised issue with conversational agents (9 studies) was poor understanding because of limited vocabulary, voice recognition accuracy, or error management of word inputs [13,32-37,41,52].”
  • In the 3 included studies of virtual patients, users in all 3 reported liking that it provided a platform for risk-free learning because they were not practicing on real patients.

    “In the included studies, 3 of the conversational agents were virtual patients, and users in all 3 studies reported liking that it provided a platform for risk-free learning because they were not practicing on real patients [15,41,50].”
  • Only a few included studies discussed any improvement in health care provision or implications for resources.

    “Unfortunately, only a few of the studies discussed any improvement in health care provision or implications for resources; 2 of the studies that suggested improvement in health care provision were evaluating virtual patients [41,50], and students in 1 study reported significantly increased confidence in their clinical skills and ability to interview patients.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Washburn, M., Bordnick, P., & Rizzo, A. “.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Washburn, Micki
Venue
Social Work in Health Care
Published
2016-08-23
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
675-693
ISSN
  • 0098-1389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-034X
OpenAlex
W2509826262
Cited by
66
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Work in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
virtual patient simulation, social work students, clinical interviewing skills, diagnostic accuracy, multidisciplinary care, feasibility and acceptability, simulation-based education
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Adult, Mental Disorders, Clinical Competence, Education, Graduate, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Mental Health, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Work, Students, Program Evaluation, Patient Simulation, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review