The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Immigration through Language and Country Knowledge Requirements
Open accessAbstract
This article examines why some states in Western Europe have adopted integration-from-abroad requirements, which include tests and language courses administered as a condition for immigration. After considering the significance and empirical differences of pre-entry integration programmes, it argues that mandatory language and country knowledge training from abroad primarily represent a deliberate and increasingly effective instrument for immigration control – specifically family unification and formation. The article first roots the political opportunity for pre-entry integration in supranational EU Directives on Family Reunification and Status of Third Country Nationals. Second, it looks at the Dutch Civic Integration from Abroad exam as a crucial case to show how mode of preparation, exempt categories, and policy language link the immigration test to migration control objectives. It concludes that this new instrument in immigration policy-making reveals strategic thinking by policy-makers to use positive, politically acceptable language of integration and inclusion to achieve potentially objectionable and discriminatory outcomes of exclusion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the pre-entry language requirements for spousal immigration established in Germany, the Netherlands, and a number of other Western nations may lead to exclusion based on cost and inability to fulfill requirements (Goodman 2011).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Goodman 2011
Citations
Cites
Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000) · Governance · doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121 · Cited by 3,314
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Brubaker Rogers, 1992, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, 10.4159/9780674028944 · DOI
- 2008, Web Magazine
- Cesarani David, 1996, Citizenship, Nationality and Migration in Europe
- 2004, Immigrant Integration Policy in the European Union
- De Lotbinière Max, 2009, The Guardian Weekly
- Entzinger Han, 2006, Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos: Incorporation Regimes in Germany, Western Europe and North America, 121, 10.1057/9781403984678_7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00864.x · DOI
- 10.1080/13691831003764300 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644000701197991 · DOI
- 10.1163/1571816042885969 · DOI
- Guild Elspeth, 2009, Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU
- Hoekstra Ineke, 2007, Andersson Elffers Felix Jaarboek, 161
- 2008, The Netherlands: Discrimination in the Name of Integration
- 2008, Monitor Inburgeringsexamen Buitenland
- 10.1080/01402380601019613 · DOI
- 10.1353/wp.2007.0022 · DOI
- 10.1080/13621020500301221 · DOI
- Mariani Thierry, 2006, Rapport sur les politiques d'intégration des migrants dans l'Union européenne
- Nascimbene Bruno., 1996, Nationality Laws in the European Union
- Scheffer Paul, 2000, NRC Handelsblad
- Van Oers Ricky, 2006, De naturalisatietoets geslaagd? Een onderzoek naar de totstandkoming en effecten van de naturalisatietoets
- Verdonk Rita, 2005, Brief aan de Tweede Kamer
- 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00134.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–105 of 105
Bonjour, S. (2013) · doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.834136
“…analyses, exploring questions of convergence and divergence, explaining national specificities or proposing modes of categorisation (Carrera 2006, Bonjour 2010, Goodman 2010, 2011, Groenendijk 2011, Jacobs and Rea 2007, Joppke 2007a, van Oers et al. 2010 – see also the PROSINT and INTEC projects1).”
BackgroundSahni, A. (2023) · Policy Perspectives · doi:10.4079/pp.v30i0.07
Jesse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.020
Jesse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.001
Kin-Citizenship in the Contemporary European Context
Pogonyi, S. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52467-2_3
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Sara Wallace
- Venue
- West European Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-255
- ISSN
- 0140-2382 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2096625326
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- West European Politics (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Keywords
- immigration control, language requirements, family reunification, third-country nationals, EU directives, Dutch immigration policy, language of integration, policy language, family formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review