The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Immigration through Language and Country Knowledge Requirements
Open accessAbstract
This article examines why some states in Western Europe have adopted integration-from-abroad requirements, which include tests and language courses administered as a condition for immigration. After considering the significance and empirical differences of pre-entry integration programmes, it argues that mandatory language and country knowledge training from abroad primarily represent a deliberate and increasingly effective instrument for immigration control – specifically family unification and formation. The article first roots the political opportunity for pre-entry integration in supranational EU Directives on Family Reunification and Status of Third Country Nationals. Second, it looks at the Dutch Civic Integration from Abroad exam as a crucial case to show how mode of preparation, exempt categories, and policy language link the immigration test to migration control objectives. It concludes that this new instrument in immigration policy-making reveals strategic thinking by policy-makers to use positive, politically acceptable language of integration and inclusion to achieve potentially objectionable and discriminatory outcomes of exclusion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the pre-entry language requirements for spousal immigration established in Germany, the Netherlands, and a number of other Western nations may lead to exclusion based on cost and inability to fulfill requirements (Goodman 2011).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Goodman 2011
Citations
Cites
Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000) · Governance · doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121 · Cited by 3,314
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Brubaker Rogers, 1992, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, 10.4159/9780674028944 · DOI
- 2008, Web Magazine
- Cesarani David, 1996, Citizenship, Nationality and Migration in Europe
- 2004, Immigrant Integration Policy in the European Union
- De Lotbinière Max, 2009, The Guardian Weekly
- Entzinger Han, 2006, Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos: Incorporation Regimes in Germany, Western Europe and North America, 121, 10.1057/9781403984678_7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00864.x · DOI
- 10.1080/13691831003764300 · DOI
- 10.1080/09644000701197991 · DOI
- 10.1163/1571816042885969 · DOI
- Guild Elspeth, 2009, Illiberal Liberal States: Immigration, Citizenship and Integration in the EU
- Hoekstra Ineke, 2007, Andersson Elffers Felix Jaarboek, 161
- 2008, The Netherlands: Discrimination in the Name of Integration
- 2008, Monitor Inburgeringsexamen Buitenland
- 10.1080/01402380601019613 · DOI
- 10.1353/wp.2007.0022 · DOI
- 10.1080/13621020500301221 · DOI
- Mariani Thierry, 2006, Rapport sur les politiques d'intégration des migrants dans l'Union européenne
- Nascimbene Bruno., 1996, Nationality Laws in the European Union
- Scheffer Paul, 2000, NRC Handelsblad
- Van Oers Ricky, 2006, De naturalisatietoets geslaagd? Een onderzoek naar de totstandkoming en effecten van de naturalisatietoets
- Verdonk Rita, 2005, Brief aan de Tweede Kamer
- 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00134.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 344
Discrimination in migration and citizenship
Ellermann, A. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1561053 · Cited by 168
After the refugee crisis: public discourse and policy change in Denmark, Norway and Sweden
Hagelund, A. (2020) · doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0169-8 · Cited by 124
“Hagelund Comparative Migration Studies (2020) 8:13 Page 8 of 17”
BackgroundInfluentialStruggling over the mode of incorporation: backlash against multiculturalism in Europe
Alexander, J. (2013) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2012.752515 · Cited by 116
Fortifying Citizenship: Policy Strategies for Civic Integration in Western Europe
Goodman, S. W. (2012) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887112000184 · Cited by 143
“…by national elites at the european level, where the possibility of applying integration conditions was ultimately codified in eU directives. see goodman 2011. welfare state dependence,7 the “rightist turn of the political climate,”8 elite consensus over the idea of civic integration,9 and…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHuddleston, T., & Vink, M. (2015) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0006-7 · Cited by 84
“The presumed link between naturalisation and family reunion laws may be driven by similar political discussions of restricting marriage migration, including for the second generation (Goodman, 2011; Wray, 2013; Strik et al., 2013).”
BackgroundControlling immigration? How regulations affect migration flows
Helbling, M., & Leblang, D. A. (2018) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12279 · Cited by 121
The civic turn of immigrant integration policies in the Scandinavian welfare states
Borevi, K., Jensen, K. K., & Mouritsen, P. (2017) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-017-0052-4 · Cited by 80
“Scholars in the field must intensify their efforts to study the actual effects of civic integration policies, and, by providing such factual grounding, they must help shelter policy developments in the field from the worst entrapments of ‘common sense’ ideological illusions about what works and why.”
BackgroundFamily Migration as a Class Matter
Kofman, E. (2018) · International Migration · doi:10.1111/imig.12433 · Cited by 70
Human-capital citizenship and the changing logic of immigrant admissions
Ellermann, A. (2019) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1561062 · Cited by 158
“In other words, family ties, while necessary, oftentimes are no longer sufficient to gain access to family immigration as states have imposed new conditionalities on family sponsorship ranging from heightened income and age requirements in virtually all states, to policies of civic integration – such as the use of pre…”
BackgroundInfluentialHernes, V. (2018) · doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748 · Cited by 65
“The current debate in the integration literature has offered different ways of decomposing policies: for example, Joppke (2017) refers to Bennett’s (1991) operationalisation (see above); Goodman (2011) distinguishes between ideational and policy convergence.”
BackgroundResultGest, J., Boucher, A., Challen, S., Burgoon, B., Thielemann, E., Beine, M., McGovern, P., Crock, M., Rapoport, H., & Hiscox, M. (2014) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12132 · Cited by 58
“Naturalization policies, especially those featuring citizenship tests or lengthy waiting periods, may act as deterrents against certain types of migratory flows (Goodman 2011).”
BackgroundThrough the European looking glass: citizenship tests in the USA, Australia, and Canada
Joppke, C. (2013) · doi:10.1080/13621025.2012.669965 · Cited by 52
Germany: A Changing Country of Immigration
Green, S. (2013) · doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.832757 · Cited by 48
“lowed the lead of other European countries, notably the Netherlands, in introducing pre-entry integration requirements for dependants.(30) These have included language competence and self-sufficiency in terms of income, but controversially only apply to citizens of non-EU countries which are subject to visa entry requ…”
BackgroundLabor market situation of refugees in Europe: The role of individual and contextual factors
Kosyakova, Y., & Kogan, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.977764 · Cited by 51
“…are often accompanied by integration courses and civic education to a “basic knowledge of the host society’s language, history, and institution” (Goodman, 2011) and are more often available for refugees than for other immigrants in most EU countries (Zwysen, 2019; Kanas and Steinmetz, 2021).”
BackgroundManaging the National Status Group: Immigration Policy in Germany
Elrick, J., & Winter, E. (2018) · doi:10.1111/imig.12400 · Cited by 41
FitzGerald, D., Cook-Martín, D., García, A. S., & Arar, R. (2018) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1313106 · Cited by 39
Bonjour, S. (2014) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.5117/cms2014.2.bonj · Cited by 35
“…integration policies in general and predeparture integration requirements in particular has received increasing attention in the literature (cf. Carrera 2006; Goodman 2010, 2011; Groenendijk 2011; Jacobs and Rea 2007; Joppke 2007; Van Oers et al 2010 – see also the PROSINT and INTEC projects2).”
BackgroundInfluentialJeram, S. (2014) · doi:10.1080/17449057.2013.853998 · Cited by 33
“9% in 2009, well below the EU average, is considered a ‘pioneer’ of the strategy of civic integration to limit immigration, especially family reunification (Goodman, 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialMeasurement and Interpretation Issues in Civic Integration Studies: A Rejoinder
Goodman, S. (2012) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2012.640028 · Cited by 30
“[8] In other work (Goodman 2011), I argue that conditions under which integration requirements for immigration are adopted*namely political opportunities created by EU Directives, ambitions to regulate and limit family-based migration, and policy diffusion*differ from those of citizenship and settlement.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationStaver, A. (2015) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x14557491 · Cited by 29
Indexing Immigration and Integration Policy: Lessons from Europe
Goodman, S. (2018) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12283 · Cited by 26
“For example, in Europe, entry often requires meeting certain expectations of integration, like language proficiency or cultural familiarity (FitzGerald, CookMartín, García, & Arar, 2018; Goodman, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDiscrimination and Policies of Immigrant Selection in Liberal States
Ellermann, A., & Goenaga, A. (2019) · Politics & Society · doi:10.1177/0032329218820870 · Cited by 25
Intergovernmental relations on immigrant integration in multi-level states. A comparative assessment
Adam, I., & Hepburn, E. (2018) · Regional & Federal Studies · doi:10.1080/13597566.2018.1524376 · Cited by 19
“There is good reason to believe that the exchange and diffusion of information in these European platforms has not only contributed to policy diffusion across member-states (Wallace Goodman 2011; Block and Bonjour 2013), but also within Belgium, and across regions (Adam and Martiniello 2013).”
BackgroundMerolli, J. L. (2016) · doi:10.1080/13621025.2016.1229192 · Cited by 17
Integration Discourses, the Purification of Gender and Interventions in Family Migrations
Kofman, E. (2023) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2023.2166791 · Cited by 14
Jutvik, K., & Robinson, D. (2020) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-020-00203-3 · Cited by 14
“…language skills, norm adherence, and cultural-historical knowledge shown by the migrant (Strik et al. 2010; Goodman and Wright 2015; Goodman 2010; Goodman 2011; Borevi et al. 2017).1 Other lines of research focus on the impact of residency status on non-labour outcomes such as health or…”
BackgroundRoutledge handbook of European politics
Magone, J. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315755830 · Cited by 14
“…the implementation of an additional tier to allocate seats in PR systems; sixth, an increase of at least 20 per cent in the percentage of seats that are allocated in the PR tier in mixed systems; and, seventh, the introduction of linkage between tiers in Pedro Riera multi-tier or mixed systems.”
BackgroundDrangsland, K. A. K. (2024) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2024.2321175 · Cited by 14
“Language testing as a technique of governing access to rights and privileges has gained relevance in the global north in the context of the securitisation of migration (Goodman 2011; Hyndman 2012; Khan 2022b).”
Hernes, V., & Łukasiewicz, K. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2565907 · Cited by 11
“…mainly conclude that European countries have become increasingly restrictive in admission, asylum and integration policies, access to family reunification and permanent residency and citizenship (Gebhardt 2016; Goodman 2011; Joppke 2007, 2017; Klaus and Pachocka 2019; Lafleur and Mescoli 2018).”
Co-constructions of family and belonging in the politics of family migration
Bonjour, S., & Cleton, L. (2021) · Handbook on the Governance and Politics of Migration · doi:10.4337/9781788117234.00020 · Cited by 11
“In addition, Goodman (2011) highlights that these tests follow an implicit racial logic, mainly targeting Muslim sending countries, since family migrants from countries such as the United States and Canada are exempted from taking these tests.”
BackgroundIs the post-multicultural era pro-diversity?
de Waal, T. (2018) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-018-0084-4 · Cited by 11
“These policies often take the form of language and knowledge-of-country requirements for newly arrived immigrants, and are prerequisites for attaining permanent residency and full citizenship (see e.g., De Waal, 2017; Goodman, 2010; Goodman, 2011; Van Oers, 2013).”
Jeram, S., & Adam, I. (2015) · doi:10.1080/14608944.2014.951611 · Cited by 11
“Moreover, the coincident argument that state nationalisms are more likely to adopt inclusive positions towards immigrants is questionable because many nation states have shifted towards stricter immigration and settlement policies that use integration tests as tools of exclusion (Goodman, 2011).”
BackgroundGoodman, S. (2018) · The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe · doi:10.4324/9781315512853-17 · Cited by 10
“Either way, it can be used as a novel device of immigration control (Bonjour, 2010; Goodman, 2011), especially geared towards the reduction of thirdcountry nationals and familybased migration (i.”
MethodSelf-citationDeterritorialized and unfinished “integration nations”?
Dahinden, J. (2022) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2022.2130705 · Cited by 9
“…of family reunification rights is in these instances – i.e. in case of the UK, Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands or France – linked to the condition that incoming spouses should fulfil a socalled “pre-departure” or “pre-integrative” language and country knowledge requirement (Goodman 2011).”
BackgroundDanielsen, Å., & Hernes, V. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2565908 · Cited by 8
“Previous research contributing to the restrictive-liberal debate has mostly concluded that European countries have become increasingly restrictive (Goodman 2011; Joppke 2017), and studies of the Scandinavian countries also support similar conclusions (Dahl-stedt and Neergaard 2019; Ekman and…”
Tesfai, R. (2020) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1686162 · Cited by 8
Jesse, M., & Carter, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.016 · Cited by 2
Dodevska, I. (2023) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2023.2247170 · Cited by 7
Jesse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.003 · Cited by 3
Ulbricht, C. (2019) · Comparative Migration Studies · doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0133-7 · Cited by 7
“These studies are concerned with the institutionalised social boundaries involving primarily citizenship policies (Howard, 2006; Janoski, 2010; Koopmans, Michalowski, & Waibel, 2012) and studies of integration policies (Banting & Kymlicka, 2013; Goodman, 2010, 2011, 2015; Joppke, 2007).”
BackgroundIs There an Evidence Basis for Immigrant Integration Policies?
Garibay, M., & Cuyper, P. D. (2018) · doi:10.1515/njmr-2018-0010 · Cited by 6
“…focussed so far on the philosophy and the politics of integration policies rather than on the effects of those policies: topics include citizenship (Goodman 2009, 2011; Joppke 2007), the politics and governance of civic integration (Jørgensen 2012; Poppelaars & Scholten 2008), the interactions…”
Background‘I won’t naturalize foreigners like crazy’: The Naturalization Campaign in Venezuela, 2004-2006
Schwarz, T. (2016) · doi:10.18352/erlacs.10093 · Cited by 6
“During the past decade, nationality policies in many countries (most visibly perhaps in Western Europe) have attempted to make it more demanding to become a new citizen by imposing naturalization tests (Goodman, 2011).”
BackgroundThe Reception of Asylum Seekers in Europe
Segarra, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.012 · Cited by 3
Williams, D. (2018) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci7040061 · Cited by 5
“Other critical work has examined the use of integration programs as a tool of racial and ethnic projects (Fitzgerald et al. 2017) or as a tool of immigration control (Goodman 2011).”
Background“Welcome to France.” Can mandatory integration contracts foster immigrant integration?
Emeriau, M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., & Laitin, D. (2025) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12955 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Admission Policies on Rates of Family Migration in European States, 2008–2019
Ahlén, A. (2024) · Nordic Journal of Migration Research · doi:10.33134/njmr.707 · Cited by 4
“…many scholars have made regarding growing conditionality and stratification in family migration policy (e.g. Bech, Borevi & Mouritsen 2017; Block 2015; Bonjour & Kraler 2015; Goodman 2011; Kofman 2018; Scholten et al. 2012; Schweitzer 2015; Sirriyeh 2015; Strik, de Hart & Nissen 2013; Wray 2009).”
BackgroundStructural linguistic injustice
Song, S. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12658 · Cited by 5
Hernes, V., & Staver, A. B. (2023) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/02610183231199656 · Cited by 4
“Indeed, an extensive literature has noted that integration requirements more often demonstrate a selective effect on immigration, as opposed to positive effects on labour-market integration (Goodman, 2011; Jensen et al., 2019).”
BackgroundKwon, R., Scarborough, W. J., & Faglie, T. (2022) · International Journal of Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1177/00207152221094562 · Cited by 4
Rottmann, S. (2020) · Identities · doi:10.1080/1070289x.2020.1851004 · Cited by 4
“EU citizens, highly skilled and economically well-off migrants receive preferential treatment in most states (Goodman 2011; Strik, Hart de, and Nissen 2013; Staver 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialRefugees’ Integration into the Labour Market
Morano‐Foadi, S., Croce, C. D., & Lugosi, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.014
Welfens, N., & Pisarevskaya, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.006 · Cited by 29
Language Proficiency and Migration: An Argument Against Testing
von Busekist, A., & Boudou, B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_5 · Cited by 11
“…of immigration policies, and the language requirement is used not only as part of the conditions for naturalization but also as a “pre-entry barrier” (Goodman 2011) used against migrants.1 1We do not discuss the sovereign right of states to legalize or constitutionalize official or national…”
InfluentialHerz, M., Andreasson, J., & Andréasson, F. (2022) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/239788221x16456304482483 · Cited by 4
“According to research, such policies are considered as more a disguised form of migration control than as actual help aimed at the individual or family (Goodman, 2011; Ahlén and Boräng, 2018).”
BackgroundMulticulturalism Today: Difference, Equality and Interculturalism
Modood, T., & de Waal, T. (2020) · Equality · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54310-5_4 · Cited by 4
Molfetta, E. D. (2025) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806251349191 · Cited by 2
“On the contrary, pre-entry language tests function as a selection mechanism, allowing governments to classify individuals among different ethnic groups (FitzGerald et al., 2018; Goodman, 2011).”
Conservatism and the Re-Communitarianization of Citizenship in Canada
Carlaw, J., & Winter, E. (2022) · Nationalism & Ethnic Politics · doi:10.1080/13537113.2022.2145056 · Cited by 3
“…nation-states started to both liberalize their immigration policies and introduce demanding citizenship tests as a means of immigration control, 18 the American political philosopher Amitai Etzioni 19 published an influential article in The Political Quarterly in which he provides “ compelling…”
BackgroundLanguage Assessment for Immigration: A Review of Validation Research Over the Last Two Decades
Yao, D., & Wallace, M. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773132 · Cited by 3
“…salient issue in the discussion of immigration policy because it is regarded as a pre-entry requirement (Magos and Politi, 2008; Kostakopoulo, 2010; Goodman, 2011; Frost and McNamara, 2018); and immigrationseekers’ application results, even partially based on language proficiency, may still bring…”
BackgroundRespect, freedom, citizenship: Muslim women’s secularities and perspectives on wellbeing
Pool, F. W. (2021) · Religion, State and Society · doi:10.1080/09637494.2021.1971038 · Cited by 3
“This backlash informed a shift in emphasis from the emancipation of ethnic minorities to integration and citizenship (the so-called civic integration turn) (Bonjour and Duyvendak 2018; Goodman 2011).”
BackgroundEuropean Societies, Migration, and the Law
Welfens, N., Pisarevskaya, A., & Jesse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637 · Cited by 5
Do Linguists Need Economics and Economists Linguistics?
Vigouroux, C. B., & Mufwene, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108783101.002 · Cited by 3
The Right to Family Reunion vs Integration Conditions for Third-Country Nationals
Dąbrowska-Kłosińska, P. (2018) · European Journal of Migration and Law · doi:10.1163/15718166-12340030 · Cited by 3
“166 Goodman 2011, n 128 above, p. 235.”
Do Integration Courses Influence Refugees’ Integration Trajectories? Evidence from Norway
Ferwerda, J., & Finseraas, H. (2024) · Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/734247 · Cited by 2
Pre‐departure language requirements for family reunification
van den Berg, T. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12654 · Cited by 2
The Making of Canadian Immigration Policy
Ellermann, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316551103.005 · Cited by 1
The Crimmigrant ‘Other’ at Europe’s Intra-Schengen Borders
van der Woude, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.005 · Cited by 3
Voluntary International Migration
Money, J., Kazemian, S., & Taylor, T. W. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0167 · Cited by 4
Immigration policy-making in Europe
Goodman, S. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315755830.ch44 · Cited by 2
“With the exception of civic integration policies, namely language and host society knowledge requirements (Goodman 2011; Groenendijk 2011), integration policies do not impact a migrant’s opportunity to enter a host society; however, they significantly impact a migrant’s ability to successfully…”
BackgroundSelf-citationVanbuel, M., & Bugge, E. (2026) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/02655322261428163 · Cited by 1
Whom do we naturalise? A factorial survey on naturalisation preferences in Germany
Gülzau, F. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2530634 · Cited by 1
“Instead, cultural and economic factors, such as evaluating an applicant’s economic independence or requiring integration courses, have become common (Goodman 2011) and increasingly supported among German citizens (Diehl and Tucci 2011; Worbs 2009).”
Beyond legal immobility: integrationist tools in Italian naturalization policy ?
Trucco, D. (2025) · Journal of Modern Italian Studies · doi:10.1080/1354571x.2025.2483573 · Cited by 1
“Distancing herself from most literature on citizenship tests debating their in-or exclusionary and (il)liberal nature (Kostakopoulou 2010; Goodman 2011; Hampshire 2011; van Oers 2013), Merolli shows in her analysis of integration exams in Canada, the UK and the Netherlands how they were introduced…”
Gao, J., Nyhan, J., Duke‐Williams, O., & Mahony, S. (2023) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-06-2023-0113 · Cited by 6
Chapter 20. Language, mobility and inclusion
Dunbar, R., & McKelvey, R. (2022) · Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy · doi:10.1075/wlp.9.20dun · Cited by 1
Alienation of ‘Second Generation Turkish Dutch’ in the Name of ‘Integration’
MUYAN, G. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.009 · Cited by 2
The Non-national as ‘The Other’
de Vries, K. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.011 · Cited by 25
The Power of the Past: Understanding Cross-Class Marriages
Eriksen, S. J. (2016) · doi:10.1177/0094306116671949zz · Cited by 1
Integration and New Limits on Citizenship Rights: Denmark and Beyond
Street, A. (2016) · doi:10.1177/0094306116671949yy · Cited by 1
Fargues, É., Solano, G., Huddleston, T., Vink, M., Schmid, S. D., Baubock, R., Pedroza, L., Palop‐García, P., Džankić, J., & Mantha-Hollands, A. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4148470 · Cited by 1
“Stadlmair (2018) zoomed in on the effects economic conditions for naturalisation, in particular; Goodman (2011), and, more recently, Jensen et al. (2019) discussed how language requirements may impact on naturalisation rates.”
BackgroundFrom migrants into Frenchmen: the republican model of linguistic integration reconsidered
de Latour, S. G. (2026) · Sociolinguistica · doi:10.1515/soci-2026-0032
“It is therefore not surprising to observe that a consensus has emerged among theorists in favor of multicultural policies, for whom requiring language does not push citizenship tests across the threshold of discriminatory, illiberal practices (Goodman 2011; Benhabib 2011: 164; Carens 2013: 183).”
Lacina, B. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197832219.001.0001
Pullen, D., Bown, A., & Yang-Heim, G. Y. A. (2026) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/1j24yc10
“Turning to the digital sphere, Alonso-Muñoz et al. (2020) examine Eurosceptic discourse on Twitter during the 2019 European Parliament elections.”
InfluentialWhat drives language requirements in migration? A policymaker-focused discourse analysis
Schildt, L. (2026) · Language Policy · doi:10.1007/s10993-026-09768-8
“Language proficiency in a majority or official language is increasingly being used as a condition of immigration and to determine eligibility for residency or citizenship (Goodman, 2011; van Oers, 2021).”
Community and state responsibility to assist in immigrant language acquisition
Rowe, C. W. (2025) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2025.2478726
Pravica do združitve družine in merila jezikovne integracije
Samobor, A. (2024) · Slovenščina 2.0: Empirične, Aplikativne in Interdisciplinarne Raziskave · doi:10.4312/slo2.0.2024.2.94-122
“55 Mnogi avtorji kljub odsotnosti harmonizacije zakonodaj in kljub raz-likovanju politik integracije opažajo splošen (evropski) trend zaostro-vanja meril in zahtev (Bonjour, 2018; Goodman, 2011; Strik idr., 2013; Block, 2015; Benarieh Ruffer, 2011; Gorenendijk, 2011).”
Uemura, M. (2022) · EU Studies in Japan · doi:10.5135/eusj.2022.97
The Making of Swiss Immigration Policy
Ellermann, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316551103.003
The Making of US Immigration Policy
Ellermann, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316551103.006
The Making of German Immigration Policy
Ellermann, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316551103.004
Ellermann, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316551103.002
Inclusion and Exclusion of Migrant Workers in the EU
Carter, D. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.017
Different Levels of ‘Legal Otherness’ in the Context of Expulsion and Entry Bans
Hamenstädt, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.010 · Cited by 1
Integration Impossible? Ethnic Nationalism and Refugee Integration in Bulgaria
van Harten, E. B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.013
‘Othering’ in Unconcerned Democracies and the Rise of Anti-liberal Political Divisions
Hofmannová, H., & Řepa, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.004 · Cited by 1
Kostakopoulou, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.015
Deciphering the Role of (Migration) Law in the Social Construction of ‘Otherness’
Thym, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.018
Jesse, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.019 · Cited by 1
The Rights of ‘Others’ in Domestic Constitutions
Murphy, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.007
Idriz, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108767637.008
Chapter 13. Idealism or pragmatism?
von Busekist, A. (2018) · Studies in World Language Problems · doi:10.1075/wlp.6.13von
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, S. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodman, Sara Wallace
- Venue
- West European Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-255
- ISSN
- 0140-2382 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2096625326
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- West European Politics (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Keywords
- immigration control, language requirements, family reunification, third-country nationals, EU directives, Dutch immigration policy, language of integration, policy language, family formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review