The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cyber War Will Not Take Place
Abstract
For almost two decades, experts and defense establishments the world over have been predicting that cyber war is coming. But is it? This article argues in three steps that cyber war has never happened in the past, that cyber war does not take place in the present, and that it is unlikely that cyber war will occur in the future. It first outlines what would constitute cyber war: a potentially lethal, instrumental, and political act of force conducted through malicious code. The second part shows what cyber war is not, case-by-case. Not one single cyber offense on record constitutes an act of war on its own. The final part offers a more nuanced terminology to come to terms with cyber attacks. All politically motivated cyber attacks are merely sophisticated versions of three activities that are as old as warfare itself: sabotage, espionage, and subversion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most scholars working on cyber issues, however, argue that cyber capabilities are unlikely to be critical to warfare ( Junio 2013, Rid 2012).”
From Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics? (2020) · cites this paper as Rid 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Adair Steven, 2008, Shadow Server
- Adee Sally, 2008, IEEE Spectrum
- 10.1080/01495939308402915 · DOI · Paper page
- Arthur Charles, 2011, Guardian
- Blakely Rhys, 2007, The Times
- Bright Peter, 2011, Ars Technica
- Broad J. William, 2011, New York Times, A1
- Carr Jeffrey, 2009, GreyLogic
- Clarke A. Richard, 2010, Cyber War
- Clausewitz Carl von, 1832, Vom Kriege
- Clover Charles, 2009, Financial Times
- Courtney Siobhan, 2009, BBC News
- Crenshaw Adrian, 2011, Irongeek.com
- Daniel Lisa, 2011, American Forces Press Service
- Deibert Ron, 2009, Tracking Ghostnet
- Dinstein Yoram, 2002, International Law Studies, 76, 99
- Evron Gadi, 2008, Science & Technology, 121
- Evron Gadi, 2009, Darkreading
- Falliere Nicolas, 2011, W32.Stuxnet Dossier. Version 1.4
- Fulghum A. David, 2007, Aviation Week & Space Technology, 167, 28
- Fulghum A. David, 2007, Aviation Week & Space Technology, 168
- Galula David, 1964, Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice
- Gandhi Robin, 2011, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28
- Gibbs P. Jack, 1986, Law as a Behavioral Instrument
- Giraudoux Jean, 1955, Tiger at the Gates [La Guerre De Troie N'aura Pas Lieu]
- Graham Bradley, 2005, Washington Post
- Gross Joseph Michael, 2011, Vanity Fair
- Hayden V. Michael, 2011, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 5, 3
- Langner Ralph, 2011, The Last Line of Cyber Defense
- Langner Ralph, 2011, The Last Line of Cyber Defense
- Langner Ralph, 2011, TED Talk
- Langner Ralph, 2011, The Last Line of Cyber Defense
- Laqueur Walter, 1976, Guerrilla: A Historical and Critical Study
- Libicki Martin, 2009, Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar
- Lynn J. William, 2010, Foreign Affairs, 89, 97
- Mahnken G. Thomas, 2011, America's Cyber Future: Security and Prosperity in the Information Age, 2, 53
- Markoff John, 2010, New York Times
- Medetsky Anatoly, 2004, Moscow Times
- Nakashima Ellen, 2007, Washington Post, A1
- Nazario Jose, 2009, The Virtual Battlefield, 163
- Obama Barack, 2011, International Strategy for Cyberspace
- Ottis, Rain. ‘From Pitchforks to Laptops: Volunteers in Cyber Conflicts’. Conference on Cyber Conflict Proceedings.
- Reed C. Thomas, 2004, At the Abyss
- Rid Thomas, 2010, Policy Review, 158, 3
- Tikk Eneken, 2008, Cyber Attacks against Georgia
- Tikk Eneken, 2010, International Cyber Incidents
- Waxman C. Matthew, 2011, Yale Journal of International Law, 36, 421
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 494
Proportionality in cyberwar and just war theory
Hjorthen, F. D., & Pattison, J. (2023) · Ethics & Global Politics · doi:10.1080/16544951.2023.2179244 · Cited by 6
“…most notably with Russian interference in the US presidential election in 2016, but also with attacks on countries such as Estonia and Georgia (Rid 2012, 5–32; 12–15).1 More recently, the hacking attack into the email system of the Norwegian parliament in August 2020 was attributed to Russian…”
BackgroundWhat is the Future of Cyber Deterrence?
Lonergan, E., & Montgomery, M. R. (2021) · SAIS Review of International Affairs · doi:10.1353/sais.2021.0018 · Cited by 6
Cyber-weapons in nuclear counter-proliferation
Horschig, D. (2020) · Defense and Security Analysis · doi:10.1080/14751798.2020.1790811 · Cited by 6
“Although it had only limited effects, it is considered one of the most sophisticated known cyberattacks to date.(32) The worm damaged the centrifuges slowly, making Iranian operators believe that the centrifuges were running normally(33) whilst evading anti-virus software.”
BackgroundFasana, K. G. (2018) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2018.1462661 · Cited by 7
“For example, Rid (2012) views cyber conflict as akin to subversion, sabotage, or spying.”
BackgroundDewar, R. (2017) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000169631 · Cited by 6
“In Georgia in 2008 the aim was to spread anti-govern-ment propaganda and disrupt public service websites during the conflict with Russia in that year (Rid, 2013, p. 7).”
Strategic Cyberwar Theory–A Foundation for Designing Decisive Strategic Cyber Operations
Kallberg, J. (2016) · The Cyber Defense Review · doi:10.55682/cdr/etjg-434q · Cited by 6
“[4] It works as an intellectual short cut, but the traditional military thinking fails to acknowledge the unity tenets of cyber.”
BackgroundCyberwar: A new frontier for political geography
Warf, B. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.07.010 · Cited by 6
Shackelford, S. J., Richards, E. L., Raymond, A., & Craig, A. N. (2015) · doi:10.1111/ablj.12041 · Cited by 6
Neither Conventional War, nor a Cyber War, but a Long-Lasting and Silent Hybrid War
Schmidt, N. (2015) · doi:10.3849/1802-7199.14.2014.02.073-086 · Cited by 6
Robust Stealthy Covert Attacks on Cyber-Physical Systems
Li, X.-R., Zhang, P., & Dong, H.-L. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.181 · Cited by 6
Arming Cyberspace: The Militarization of a Virtual Domain
Gomez, M. A. (2016) · doi:10.18278/gsis.1.2.4 · Cited by 6
van den Berg, B. (2016) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7376-8_1 · Cited by 5
Thinking Systemically about Security and Resilience in an Era of Cybered Conflict
Dombrowski, P., & Demchak, C. (2015) · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8456-0.ch014 · Cited by 6
Private-public initiatives for cybersecurity: the case of Ukraine
Axon, L., Saunders, J., Esteve-González, P., Carver, J., Dutton, W. H., Goldsmith, M., & Creese, S. (2025) · Journal of Cyber Policy · doi:10.1080/23738871.2025.2451256 · Cited by 5
An Assessment of the Harms Associated With Ideologically Motivated Cyberattacks
Holt, T. J., Chermak, S., Freilich, J. D., Turner, N. D., & Greene-Colozzi, E. (2024) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287241271221 · Cited by 5
“Since definitive actor attribution in cyberattacks is often difficult (see Rid, 2013), these four measures were converted into a binary measure.”
InfluentialBackman, S. (2023) · Journal of Cyber Policy · doi:10.1080/23738871.2023.2281675 · Cited by 5
Saving face in the cyberspace: Responses to public cyber intrusions in the Gulf
Abramson, Y., & Baram, G. (2023) · Contemporary Security Policy · doi:10.1080/13523260.2023.2271794 · Cited by 6
“Rid (2012) suggests that there are incentives for governments and fi rms to keep cyber intrusion secret “ lest they would expose their vulnerabilities and damage their reputation as a place for secure investment ” (pp. 28 – 29).”
BackgroundGeorgia 2008: Conflict Dynamics in the Cyber Domain
Mareš, M., & Netolická, V. (2020) · Strategic Analysis · doi:10.1080/09700161.2020.1778278 · Cited by 5
“51 The most common type was the use of botnets, and most often they attacked networks located in Turkey, Russia, and neighbouring states.”
BackgroundUsing Mini-Games to Teach Cyber Issues to Social Science Students
Whyte, C. (2020) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2020.1737537 · Cited by 5
Lonsdale, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Military Ethics · doi:10.1080/15027570.2020.1764694 · Cited by 5
“Whether or not it represents an effective means to pursue policy is open to question (Brenner and Lindsay 2015; Gartzke 2013; Rid 2012; Valeriano and Maness 2015; Lonsdale 2016).”
BackgroundSeoane, M. V., & Saguier, M. (2019) · Relaciones Internacionales · doi:10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2019.40.005 · Cited by 5
Ten Years after the Estonian Cyberattacks: Defense and Adaptation in the Age of Digital Insecurity
Herzog, S. (2018) · doi:10.1353/gia.2017.0038 · Cited by 5
Just cyber war?: Casus belli, information ethics, and the human perspective
Sleat, M. (2017) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s026021051700047x · Cited by 6
Revisiting Cyber-Diplomacy: Canada–China Relations Online
Bousfield, D. (2017) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2017.1362176 · Cited by 5
“As Thomas Rid has argued, most online attacks lack a ‘kinetic’ (physical damage) element and therefore cannot be seen as warranting a state-based response, but are instead used to justify expenditures on ICT infrastructure (Rid, 2012).”
BackgroundWhat Is an International Cybersecurity Regime and How We Can Achieve It?
Stadnik, I. (2017) · Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology · doi:10.5817/mujlt2017-1-7 · Cited by 13
“That is why the theory of securitization introduced by Buzan, Weaver and De Wilde can be useful to draw the link between a national security and cyber domain.(33)”
BackgroundCyber-bombing ISIS: why disclose what is better kept secret?
Jacobsen, J. T., & Ringsmose, J. (2017) · Global Affairs · doi:10.1080/23340460.2017.1337471 · Cited by 9
“Finally, they cause physical damage only indirectly through the targeted computer’s potential to cause wider damage – that is, second- and third-order effects (Rid, 2013, pp. 12, 45).”
BackgroundThe concept of violence in international theory: a Double-Intent Account
Finlay, C. (2017) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971916000245 · Cited by 5
Cyber warfare: African research must address emerging reality
Mbanaso, U. (2016) · doi:10.23962/10539/21789 · Cited by 5
Hard power in cyberspace: CNA as a political means
Siedler, R. E. (2016) · International Conference on Cyber Conflict · doi:10.1109/cycon.2016.7529424 · Cited by 5
Hybrid Warfare: Preparing for Future Conflict
Miller, M. (2015) · doi:10.21236/ada618902 · Cited by 5
Shackelford, S. J., Richards, E. L., Raymond, A., & Craig, A. N. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2324619 · Cited by 5
Ethics and Cyber Conflict: A Response to JME 12:1 (2013)
Lucas, G. (2014) · Journal of Military Ethics · doi:10.1080/15027570.2014.908012 · Cited by 5
“Computer science professor and cyber expert, Neil Rowe (2007, 2008, 2010, 2011), for example, has published several papers raising an alarm that the weapons and tactics frequently and (from the standpoint of ethics, at least) unreflectively envisioned as part of any routine preparation to wage or…”
BackgroundHorowitz, M. C. (2014) · Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · doi:10.1177/0096340213516743 · Cited by 7
“Critics argue that the risk of cyber war is overblown, because truly devastating cyber attacks will be extremely difficult to execute (Gartzke, 2013; Rid, 2013); others worry that the US military and civilian economy is at risk of a cyber Pearl Harbor that will have catastrophic physical implications.”
BackgroundHarnessing ICT-Enabled Warfare: A Comprehensive Review on South Korea’s Military Meta Power
Oh, S., Cho, S., & Seo, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3378735 · Cited by 5
“These studies have mainly focused on AI capability [8], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], cyber capability [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], space capability [9], [36], [41], [42], [43], and ‘command, control, communications,…”
BackgroundThe rise of cyber power in Brazil
Devanny, J., Goldoni, L. R. F., & Medeiros, B. P. (2022) · Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional · doi:10.1590/0034-7329202200113 · Cited by 8
Butler, S. (2020) · Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79318-0_8 · Cited by 5
Simpson, T. (2014) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04135-3_9 · Cited by 5
A New Way of Conducting War: Cyberwar, Is That Real?
Mehmetcik, H. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37481-4_8 · Cited by 5
Lawson, S. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5942-1.ch106 · Cited by 5
Reflections on the Fog of (Cyber) WarPreprint
Canabarro, D., & Borne, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3155453 · Cited by 5
“( Zimet & Barry, 2009; Libicki, 2012; Rid, 2012a) The same applies to the civilian sector.”
BackgroundModel reference observer based stealthy covert attack on cyber-physical systems
Li, X.-R., Zhang, P., & Dong, H. (2025) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.108271 · Cited by 4
New technology, old strategy: Cyberspace and the international politics of African agency
Allen, N., & Lime, M. L. (2024) · Journal of Strategic Studies · doi:10.1080/01402390.2024.2330074 · Cited by 3
Emerging technology and the cult of the offensive
Lonergan, E. D. (2024) · Contemporary Security Policy · doi:10.1080/13523260.2024.2367350 · Cited by 6
The challenges of military adaptation to the cyber domain: a case study of the Netherlands
Smeets, M. (2023) · Small Wars & Insurgencies · doi:10.1080/09592318.2023.2233159 · Cited by 4
How Reversibility Differentiates Cyber from Kinetic Warfare: A Case Study in the Energy Sector
Johansmeyer, T. (2023) · International Journal of Security Privacy and Trust Management · doi:10.5121/ijsptm.2023.12101 · Cited by 1
The concept of modern political confrontation in cyber space
Kormych, L. I., & Zavhorodnia, Y. V. (2023) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyad017 · Cited by 7
INDONESIA FACING THE THREAT OF CYBER WARFARE: A STRATEGY ANALYSIS
Candra, A., Suhardi, S., & Persadha, P. D. (2021) · Jurnal pertahanan · doi:10.33172/jp.v7i3.1424 · Cited by 4
“…weaken or destroy a government or military system; espionage is defined as an attempt to penetrate a hostile system to extract sensitive or protected information; and subversion is defined as a deliberate attempt to undermine the authority, integrity, and constitution of the authority (Rid, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialCybercrime and Punishment: Security, Information War, and the Future of Runet
Gaufman, E. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_7 · Cited by 6
Hoffman, W. (2019) · The Washington quarterly · doi:10.1080/0163660x.2019.1593665 · Cited by 4
“14 This evolution-revolution distinction glosses over much nuance.”
BackgroundConflict in Cyber-Space: The Network of Cyber Incidents, 2000–2014
Baronchelli, A. (2018) · Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1515/peps-2018-0028 · Cited by 5
“Other authors, however, point out that the use of these tools in the imminent future is limited (Gartzke, 2013; Gartzke & Lindsay, 2015; Rid 2012; 2013; Valeriano & Maness 2014; 2015).”
BackgroundHansel, M., & Ruhnke, S. A. (2017) · doi:10.1177/0020702017724806 · Cited by 4
The projection and measurement of cyberpower
Venables, A., Shaikh, S., & Shuttleworth, J. (2017) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/sj.2015.35 · Cited by 4
La política brasileña de ciberseguridad como estrategia de liderazgo regional
Lobato, L. (2017) · URVIO - Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad · doi:10.17141/urvio.20.2017.2576 · Cited by 4
Russell, A. (2017) · doi:10.1017/9781316817001 · Cited by 4
A Ciberguerra É Moderna! Uma Investigação sobre a Relação entre Tecnologia e Modernização na Guerra
Lobato, L., & Kenkel, K. M. (2015) · doi:10.1590/s0102-85292015000200010 · Cited by 4
Reliable Old Wineskins: The Applicability of the Just War Tradition to Military Cyber Operations
Barrett, E. (2015) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-014-0185-4 · Cited by 4
Cyber Can Kill and Destroy Too: Blurring Borders Between Conventional and Cyber Warfare
Krotofil, M. (2014) · International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism · doi:10.4018/ijcwt.2014070103 · Cited by 4
“Nevertheless the hostility, self-sufficiency of cyber weaponry and its particular role in conventional conflicts remains a topic of heated dispute (Leed, 2013; Libicki, 2013; Rid, 2013).”
BackgroundA ‘wicked problem’ — Predicting sos behaviour in tactical land combat with compromised C4ISR
Ormrod, D. (2014) · International Conference on System of Systems Engineering · doi:10.1109/sysose.2014.6892472 · Cited by 1
“The cyber attack within Operation Orchard has been described as an integral part of the kinetic attack [29].”
BackgroundVu, A. V., Thomas, D., Collier, B., Hutchings, A., Clayton, R., & Anderson, R. J. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.10629 · Cited by 4
“Researchers, politicians, and journalists have long been fascinated by ‘cyberwar’ – the spectre of armed conflict between nations spilling over into attacks conducted over the Internet [59].”
BackgroundTerrorism and the Internet of Things: Cyber-Terrorism as an Emergent Threat
Henschke, A. (2021) · Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90221-6_5 · Cited by 4
“Rid’s argument is that because cyber-attacks are code-on-code, their impacts are primarily contained to the cyber realm [48].”
BackgroundInfluentialMinding the gap? The strategic logic of cyber coercion in theory and practice
Lonergan, E. D. (2025) · Journal of Strategic Studies · doi:10.1080/01402390.2025.2565191 · Cited by 3
Hybrid war: International security at the intersection of traditional and modern warfare
Çetinkaya, Ş. (2025) · Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi · doi:10.30783/nevsosbilen.1675508 · Cited by 3
Collateral Damage from Offensive Cyber Operations—A Systematic Literature Review
Larsson, E. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp5020035 · Cited by 3
Cotroneo, C., & Léonard, S. (2025) · International Conference on Cyber Conflict · doi:10.23919/cycon65856.2025.11103587 · Cited by 3
“Scholarly research on conceptualizations and practices of ‘cyber war’ has seen sharp disagreements over the meaning and significance of cyber operations in today’s warfare theories and practices (Rid 2012; Kello 2013; Delerue 2020; Jacobsen 2021; Neuman 2021).”
The Role of Strategic Culture in Shaping Iran’s Cyber Defense Policy
Serscikov, G. (2025) · The international journal of intelligence and counter intelligence · doi:10.1080/08850607.2024.2448959 · Cited by 3
“” 55 According to Lennart Maschmeyer, cyber operations face an operational trilemma, where the three variables of speed, intensity of effect, and control are negatively correlated.”
Cyber and contentious politics: Evidence from the US radical environmental movement
Zeitzoff, T., & Gold, G. (2024) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433231221426 · Cited by 6
“…literature in international relations on the threat posed by cyber (Kostyuk and Wayne, 2021; Kostyuk and Zhukov, 2019; Lindsay and Gartzke, 2022; Rid, 2012; Valeriano and Maness, 2015), and that public opinion is important to how the public under-stands cyber (Arsenault et al., forthcoming;…”
BackgroundLindsay, J. R. (2024) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433231217664 · Cited by 5
“Most threat activity in cyberspace is more like intelligence than warfare (Lindsay, 2021; Rid, 2012; Rovner, 2019).”
BackgroundExploit Brokers and Offensive Cyber Operations
Dellago, M., Simpson, A. C., & Woods, D. W. (2022) · The Cyber Defense Review · doi:10.55682/cdr/rnzr-va4v · Cited by 3
“The resulting debates consider issues like the nature of cyber weapons,[2,3] the possibility of cyber war[4,5] the role of norms of responsible behavior [6,7] and, most importantly for this paper, the role of private actors in developing and deploying offensive cyber technology.”
BackgroundModel for State Cyber Power: Case Study of Russian Behaviour
Mattila, J. K. (2022) · European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security · doi:10.34190/eccws.21.1.207 · Cited by 3
Beyond Hyperbole: The Evolving Subdiscipline of Cyber Conflict Studies
Brantly, A. (2020) · The Cyber Defense Review · doi:10.55682/cdr/p5cn-18rs · Cited by 3
Schünemann, W. (2019) · Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_17-1 · Cited by 3
Cyber power and control: a perspective from strategic theory
Žilinčík, S., Myklin, M., & Kovanda, P. (2019) · Journal of Cyber Policy · doi:10.1080/23738871.2019.1635177 · Cited by 4
Weak party escalation: An underestimated strategy for small states?
Angstrom, J., & Petersson, M. (2019) · Military Strategy in the 21st Century · doi:10.1080/01402390.2018.1559154 · Cited by 3
Remote assessment of countries’ cyber weapon capabilities
Mezzour, G., Carley, K. M., & Carley, L. (2018) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-018-0539-5 · Cited by 3
“Others such as Rid (2012) believe that cyber war will not take place.”
BackgroundValidating Computer Security Methods: Meta-methodology for an Adversarial SciencePreprint
Roque, A. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.01367 · Cited by 3
“We will use a taxonomy derived from Rid [60], with the following categories: 8 >>>< >>>: Criminal”
MethodMission assurance: Shifting the focus of cyber defence
Bigelow, B. (2017) · International Conference on Cyber Conflict · doi:10.23919/cycon.2017.8240327 · Cited by 3
Cyberspace in Multi-Domain Battle
Nakasone, P. M., & Lewis, C. (2017) · The Cyber Defense Review · doi:10.55682/cdr/rhjq-vdf4 · Cited by 3
Cybersecurity Politics – Conceptualization of the Idea
Górka, M. (2021) · Polish Political Science Yearbook · doi:10.15804/ppsy202112 · Cited by 3
“In the second approach, the changes in military technology appear to be a traditional element used to define cybersecurity (Rid, 2012, pp. 5-32; Stone, 2013, pp. 101-108; Libicki, 2009, p. 52; Dillon, 2002, pp. 71-79).”
BackgroundStrategic Implications of Offense and Defense in Cyberwar
Huntley, W. L. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.691 · Cited by 5
“More recently, the question has become more contended, in the context of skepticism that cyber threats in general are being “over-hyped,” although some skepticism is grounded in concerns over military agenda-setting rather than conceptual rigor [31] [4] [17].”
BackgroundDenning, D., & Strawser, B. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04135-3_6 · Cited by 3
Kallberg, J., & Burk, R. A. (2013) · doi:10.1201/b15253-15 · Cited by 2
Shives, T. R., & Fatahillah, F. (2026) · International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security · doi:10.34190/iccws.21.1.4553 · Cited by 1
“…(2015) points out that kinetic warfare doctrines fail to translate effectively into cyber operations because these operations operate without clear territory and are difficult to trace to their origins, and do not distinguish between military and civilian targets (Dunn Cavelty, 2014; Rid, 2012).”
Identity, cyber-sovereignty, and Ukraine: Towards an ontological security theory of cyberwarfare
Kolodii, R. (2025) · British Journal of Politics & International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481251383306 · Cited by 2
“1 For decades, governments have leveraged hackers and hacktivists as proxies for sub-version (Maschmeyer, 2021: 56), coercion (Wilner et al., 2024: 143), sabotage (Buchanan, 2020: 129; Rid, 2011: 5), and intelligence collection as part of a competitive race against adversaries (Rovner, 2019).”
A strategy for the weak: the role of information confrontation in Russia’s grand strategy
Eggen, K.-A. (2025) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2025.2561639 · Cited by 2
“Rid (2012) contended that cyber threats and fears of cyber war are overstated.”
Digital Interdependence and Power Politics
Oppenheimer, H. (2025) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425000328 · Cited by 6
“The cybersecurity literature is sceptical that cyberattacks alter the balance of power or fundamentally change warfare (Gartzke 2013; Rid 2013; Valeriano and Maness 2015).”
Cybersecurity and Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Challenges and Prospects of International Law
Lazari, С. С. (2025) · Moscow Journal of International Law · doi:10.24833/0869-0049-2025-1-125-137 · Cited by 2
Great Power Cyberpolitics and Global Cyberhegemony
Akdağ, Y. (2025) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592725000040 · Cited by 8
“…the absence of physical violence and human casualties from cybercon fl icts, the temporary e ff ects of cyberoperations, and the rarity of cybercoercion in cyberincidents (Craig and Valeriano 2018, 89 – 93; Gartzke 2013, 57 – 58; Harknett and Smeets 2022, 538; Rid 2012; Valer-iano and Maness 2015).”
Büyükakıncı, E. (2024) · Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi · doi:10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1609862 · Cited by 2
Assessing Cyberattacks in Response to Police Actions in Physical Space
Ferrante, D. J., & Holt, T. (2024) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2024.2429730 · Cited by 2
“There is also evidence of cyberattacks taking place in response to offline events, such as physical conflicts between nations (Rid 2013) or repressive actions by governments against minority groups (Jordan and Taylor 2004).”
Cyber Security Threats to Iran and its Countermeasures: Defensive and Offensive Cyber Strategies
Abbas, S., & Fatima, H. (2024) · Journal of Research in Social Sciences · doi:10.52015/jrss.12i2.271 · Cited by 2
“Another book "Cyber War Will Not Take Place" by Thomas Rid outlines the case that actual cyber warfare— which frequently resembles sabotage, espionage, or subversion—is unlikely to occur and emphasises the need to distinguish cyber-attacks from conventional warfare (Rid, 2012).”
BackgroundMaesschalck, S. (2024) · World Affairs · doi:10.1002/waf2.12004 · Cited by 2
Perlunya Tentara Nasional Indonesia Memiliki Angkatan Siber Guna Menghadapi Era Cyber warfare
Hasan, K. E. S. (2022) · Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) · doi:10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1192 · Cited by 2
“Dari fenomena dan peristiwa penyerangan hingga berada pada tingkat perang cyber yang telah menyerang negara Indonesia, maka terdapat 3 jenis ancaman perang cyber yang dapat terjadi yaitu sabotase, spionase dan subversi (Rid, 2012).”
BackgroundImpact of Cyber Attack on Saudi Aramco
I.alghamdi, M. I. (2021) · Journal of cybersecurity and information management · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5172091 · Cited by 2
“The Saudi Aramco is the world’s leading oil producer and the organization added that it halted the connections of its electronic systems to the outer world to avoid further cyber attacks [8].”
BackgroundUnpacking Public Perceptions of Terrorism: Does Type of Attack Matter?
Dvir, R., Geva, N., & Vedlitz, A. (2021) · Studies in Conflict and Terrorism · doi:10.1080/1057610x.2021.1886427 · Cited by 2
“All these studies recognize the effects of cyber technology on warfare and strategic choices, yet many argue that the prospect of a full-scale cyber war is limited.(36) An under-explored topic within the cyber warfare literature address public opinion.”
BackgroundStates’ Capacity Building for Cybersecurity: An IR Approach
Watanabe, S. (2020) · International Conference on Human Centered Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62803-1_18 · Cited by 2
CHALLENGES TO MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE 21ST CENTURY
Vuk, P. (2020) · CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES · doi:10.33179/bsv.99.svi.11.cmc.22.1.8 · Cited by 2
Frieß, J., Giese, B., Rößing, A., & Jeremias, G. (2020) · Sicherheit & Frieden · doi:10.5771/0175-274x-2020-1-29 · Cited by 2
“According to Rid (2013) “cyber war will not take place” – for him, cyber war is a mythos, because war contains targeted violence against people, which has not existed in previous digital attacks.”
BackgroundDigital Retaliation? Denial-of-Service Attacks after Sanction Events
Lutscher, P. (2021) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogab001 · Cited by 2
“The frequency of attacks spiked for a short period only, and their effects and overall costs appear to be still limited (cf. Rid 2012; Gartzke 2013).”
BackgroundBaram, G., & Menashri, H. (2019) · Comparative Strategy · doi:10.1080/01495933.2019.1573069 · Cited by 2
Global Code: Power and the Weak Regulation of Cyberweapons
Stevens, T. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98599-2_13 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rid, T.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rid, Thomas
- Venue
- Journal of Strategic Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-32
- ISSN
- 0140-2390 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-937X
- OpenAlex
- W2008906551
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 196.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Strategic Studies (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- cyber warfare, cyberattacks, definition of war, malware, sabotage, espionage, subversion, political violence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review