The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research
Abstract
Abstract Stimulated recall (SR) is a family of introspective research procedures through which cognitive processes can be investigated by inviting subjects to recall, when prompted by a video sequence, their concurrent thinking during that event. Variations of the generic approach are widely used and many of the studies treat SR as non‐problematic. The article reviews the strengths and weaknesses of SR and exemplifies its use in a study of non‐deliberative decision‐making by sports coaches. The study reaffirms the potential limitations of subjects reordering their accounts in response to activating deeper memory structures and in order to maintain biases of control and a priori theory affirmation. Nevertheless, the procedure successfully elicited expert accounts of decisions taken and maintained the benefits of the naturalistic context. The article concludes that SR is a valuable tool for investigating cognitive processes, although care has to be taken with research designs. The value is enhanced when there is immediacy of recall, consonance between questions and cognitive organisation, and indirect means of introspection in complex interactive contexts, such as the classroom. It has considerable potential in both research and as the basis of training programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
Cited by
Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002 · Cited by 668
Ketelaar, E., Beijaard, D., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Den Brok, P. J. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.004 · Cited by 266
Zhan, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821 · Cited by 162
RP or ‘RIP’: A critical perspective on reflective practice
Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2013) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0013 · Cited by 160
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Zhai, X., Fang, Q., Dong, Y., Wei, Z., Yuan, J., Cacciolatti, L., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12284 · Cited by 26
Composing Networks: Writing Practices on Mobile Devices
Swarts, J. (2016) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088316666807 · Cited by 13
Stevenson, B. (2015) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.990986 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyle, J.
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 861-878
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2148727360
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.