The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ambiguous insiders: an investigation of Arab American invisibility
Abstract
This article explores Arab American "invisibility" as a central theme in the historical narrative of Arab immigrants and their descendants in North America. "Invisibility" is primarily addressed in terms of Arab Americans' paradoxical positioning within the US racial/ethnic classification system. The article argues that four central paradoxes shape Arab American identity. The first paradox is that Arab Americans are a complex, diverse community, but are represented as a monolith in popular North American media images. The second paradox is that Arab Americans are simultaneously racialized as whites and as non-whites. The third paradox is that Arab Americans are racialized according to religion (Islam) rather than biology (phenotype). The fourth paradox involves the intersection between religious forms of identity that Arab immigrants bring to the US and racial forms of identity that structure US society. Overall, the article claims that each paradox of Arab American identity reinforces the difficulties associated in classifying this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Awad, G. H. (2010) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016675 · Cited by 233
Awad, G. H., Kia-Keating, M., & Amer, M. M. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000344 · Cited by 132
It’s All in the Name: Employment Discrimination Against Arab Americans1
Widner, D., & Chicoine, S. (2011) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01285.x · Cited by 107
Black Celebrity, Racial Politics, and the Press
Jackson, S. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315887043 · Cited by 58
A Meta-Analysis of Hiring Discrimination Against Muslims and Arabs
Bartkoski, T., Lynch, E., Witt, C., & Rudolph, C. (2018) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2018.02.001 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Naber, N.
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-61
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2063799388
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.