Cited by 107Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

It’s All in the Name: Employment Discrimination Against Arab Americans1

Widner, Daniel, Chicoine, Stephen·2011·Sociological Forum

Abstract

Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Arab Americans faced increased discrimination that permeated almost every aspect of their lives. Previous research has documented the negative attention toward Arab Americans after 9/11 and the effect it has had on this community. However, less research has focused on discrimination against Arab Americans during the process of obtaining employment in the United States. To address this gap in the current literature, we conducted a correspondence study in which we randomly assigned a typical white‐sounding name or a typical Arab‐sounding name to two similar fictitious résumés. We sent résumés to 265 jobs over a 15‐month period. We found that an Arab male applicant needed to send two résumés to every one résumé sent by a white male applicant to receive a callback for an interview by the hiring personnel. Our findings suggest that the difference in callbacks may be the result of discrimination against the perceived race/ethnicity of the applicant by the hiring personnel.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01285.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Widner & Chicoine (2011) found high discrimination against Arab American applicants in a US resume audit, although the estimate is highly imprecise.

    “By contrast, Widner & Chicoine (2011) find high discrimination against Arab American applicants in a US resume audit, although because the study had a small sample and low callback rate, the estimate is highly imprecise.”

    From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Widner & Chicoine (2011)

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.001 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/1559419 · DOI
  4. Cappelli Peter, 2001, Making the Most of On‐Line Recruiting, Harvard Business Review, 139
  5. 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00050.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01288.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01286.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00148-005-0050-y · DOI
  9. 10.1353/sof.2005.0030 · DOI
  10. Hadass Yael S.2004. “The Effect of Internet Recruiting on the Matching of Workers and Employers.” Retrieved July 20 2009 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=497262). · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01290.x · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01289.x · DOI
  13. Ibish I, 2003, Report on Hate Crimes and Discrimination Against Arab Americans: The Post‐September 11 Backlash, September 11, 2001–October 11, 2002
  14. 10.3368/jhr.XLII.2.275 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0095327X07308631 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01287.x · DOI
  17. Hansib Publications Limited, 2001, The Modern Book of Muslim Names
  18. 10.1080/014198700329123 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0921374006071614 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0002716206294796 · DOI
  21. Rabby Faisal andWilliam M.RodgersIII. (2009). “Post 9‐11 U.S. Muslim Labor Market Outcomes ” Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 4411. Retrieved March 7 2010 (ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp4411.pdf). · DOI
  22. 10.1111/1468-0297.00080 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00068.x · DOI
  24. Rooth Dan‐Olof.2007. “Implicit Discrimination in Hiring: Real World Evidence ” Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 2764. Retrieved March 7 2010 (http://ftp.iza.org/dp2764.pdf). · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0002716203588001011 · DOI
  26. Stewart Anne, 2003, Report on Hate Crimes and Discrimination Against Arab Americans: The Post‐September 11 Backlash September 11, 2001–October 11, 2002
  27. Thanasombat Siri, 2005, Screening Names Instead of Qualifications: Testing with Emailed Résumés Reveals Racial Preferences, AAPI Nexus, 3, 105, 10.36650/nexus3.2_105-115_ThanasombatEtAl · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Widner, D., & Chicoine, S.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
  • Widner, Daniel
  • Chicoine, Stephen
Venue
Sociological Forum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-11
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
806-823
ISSN
  • 0884-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7861
OpenAlex
W2126992858
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociological Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
Arab Americans, employment discrimination, name-based discrimination, September 11 attacks, hiring practices, job applications, correspondence education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review