The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How segregation concentrates poverty
Abstract
In this article, we argue that segregation interacts with a variety of structural transformations in society to determine the spatial concentration of poverty. Based on this argument, we then specify a statistical model overcoming methodological problems that have hampered earlier work. Estimates based on US data confirm that racial/ethnic segregation interacts with structural shifts in society to concentrate poverty. By 1990, a powerful interaction between residential segregation and income inequality had emerged to spatially isolate the poor, an interaction the effects of which were buttressed by weaker interactions between segregation, rising class segregation, and stagnating mean incomes. Our analysis reveals how underlying shifts in socio-economic structure can have very different effects on the concentration of poverty experienced by different groups, depending on the degree of racial/ethnic segregation they experience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lower public funds perpetuate reduced opportunities, lower quality and devalue housing, and lower adult income, subsequently creating and maintaining racial wealth inequity (Massey & Fischer, 2000; Orfield et al., 2008).”
From On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis (2022) · cites this paper as Massey & Fischer, 2000
In the citing paper
“In 2001 Williams and Collins published a groundbreaking paper that found racial residential segregation in the United States negatively affects health by reducing adult income for visible minorities via mechanisms that concentrate poverty ‐ including limiting fair access to elementary and secondary education, and restricting opportunities for post‐secondary education and employment (Massey & Fisch”
From On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis (2022) · cites this paper as Massey & Fischer, 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- ABRAMSON, ALAN et al. 1995 ‘The changing geography of metropolitan opportunity: · DOI
- vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45-72
- ABU-LUGHOD, JANET 1997 ‘The speci?city of the Chicago ghetto: comment on · DOI
- Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
- DENTON, NANCY A. and MASSEY, DOUGLAS S. 1989 ‘Racial identity among · DOI
- FARLEY, REYNOLDS and FREY, WILLIAM H. 1994 ‘Changes in the segregation of · DOI
- JARGOWSKY, PAUL A. 1996 ‘Take the money and run: economic segregation in U.S. · DOI
- States, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 16-67
- KASARDA, JOHN D. 1993 ‘Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: · DOI
- KATZ, MICHAEL B. 1997 ‘Comment on Loic J.D. Wacquant, “Three Pernicious Premises · DOI
- KRIVO, LAUREN J. and KAUFMAN, ROBERT L. 1999 ‘How low can it go? Declining · DOI
- LEVY, FRANK 1995 ‘Incomes and income inequality’, in Reynolds Farley (ed.), State of
- the Union: America in the 1990s, New York: Russell Sage, pp. 1-58
- Helm, pp. 61-82
- MASSEY, DOUGLAS S. 1990 ‘American apartheid: segregation and the making of the · DOI
- Gerald D. Jaynes (ed.), Immigration and Race Relations, New Haven, CT: Yale University
- MASSEY, DOUGLAS S. and DENTON, NANCY A. 1988 ‘The dimensions of residential · DOI
- - 1993 American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass, Cambridge,
- MA: Harvard University Press
- MASSEY, DOUGLAS S. and EGGERS, MITCHELL L. 1990 ‘The ecology of inequality: · DOI
- vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1153-89
- MASSEY, DOUGLAS S. and GROSS, ANDREW B. 1991 ‘Explaining trends in racial · DOI
- MASSEY, DOUGLAS S., WHITE, MICHAEL J. and PHUA, VOON-CHIN 1996 ‘The · DOI
- dimensions of segregation revisited’, Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 25, no. 2,
- pp. 172-206
- 1994 ‘Economic inequality: new methods for new trends’, American Sociological Review,
- Portrait, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- WACQUANT, LOIC J.D. 1997 ‘Three Pernicious Premises in the Study of the American · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Racial Segregation and the American Foreclosure Crisis
Rugh, J. S., & Massey, D. S. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410380868 · Cited by 686
Self-citationRacial differences in self-reports of sleep duration in a population-based study
Hale, L., & Do, D. P. (2007) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/30.9.1096 · Cited by 523
Auchincloss, A. H., Diez Roux, A. V., Brown, D. G., Erdmann, C. A., & Bertoni, A. G. (2008) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31815c480 · Cited by 167
Brown, J., Acey, C. S., Anthonj, C., Barrington, D. J., Beal, C. D., Capone, D., Cumming, O., Pullen Fedinick, K., MacDonald Gibson, J., Hicks, B., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00006-2 · Cited by 121
Mayne, S. L., Yellayi, D., Pool, L. R., Grobman, W. A., & Kershaw, K. N. (2018) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1093/ajh/hpy112 · Cited by 49
On race, human variation, and who gets and dies of sepsis
Brinkworth, J. F., & Shaw, J. G. (2022) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24527 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Massey, D. S., & Fischer, M. J.
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 670-691
- ISSN
- 0141-9870
- 1466-4356
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
