Cited by 279Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchLatin American and Latino StudiesMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latino racial choices: the effects of skin colour and discrimination on Latinos’ and Latinas’ racial self-identifications

Golash-Boza, Tanya, Darity, William·2008·Ethnic and Racial Studies

Abstract

Are predictions that Hispanics will make up 25 per cent of the US population in 2050 reliable? The authors of this paper argue that these and other predictions are problematic insofar as they do not account for the volatile nature of Latino racial and ethnic identifications. In this light, the authors propose a theoretical framework that can be used to predict Latinos’ and Latinas’ racial choices. This framework is tested using two distinct datasets – the 1989 Latino National Political Survey and the 2002 National Survey of Latinos. The results from the analyses of both of these surveys lend credence to the authors’ claims that Latinas’ and Latinos’ skin colour and experiences of discrimination affect whether people from Latin America and their descendants who live in the US will choose to identify racially as black, white or Latina/o.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01419870701568858

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Those with darker skin and who had experienced discrimination were more likely to self-identify as Latino.

    “Moreover, those with darker skin and who had experienced discrimination were more likely to self-identify as Latino (Golash-Boza and Darity 2008).”

    From A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism (2016) · cites this paper as Golash-Boza and Darity 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cruz-Janzen Marta I., 2001, Frontiers, 22, 168
  2. De La Garza Rodolfo, 1992, Latino National Political Survey, 1989–1990 Computer file
  3. Haney-López Ian, 2005, Daedalus
  4. Park Robert Ezra, 1950, Race and Culture
  5. Rodríguez Clara, 1994, Race
  6. Wade Peter, 1993, Blackness and Race Mixture: The Dynamics of Race Mixture in Colombia
  7. Whitten Norman, 1998, Blackness in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1
  8. Wright Winthrop, 1990, Café con Leche: Race, Class, and National Image in Venezuela

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Golash-Boza, T., & Darity, W.
Venue
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2008-07
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
899-934
ISSN
  • 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4356
OpenAlex
W2070090643
Cited by
279
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
racial self-identification, skin colour, discrimination, Hispanic women, Hispanic Americans, racial classification, ethnic identity change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review