Cited by 216Innovations in Medical EducationEvaluation of Teaching PracticesHealth and Medical Education

Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development

Open access
de Carvalho-Filho, Marco Antonio, Tio, René A., Steinert, Yvonne·2020·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Teaching and learning practices often fail to incorporate new concepts in the ever-evolving field of medical education. Although medical education research provides new insights into curricular development, learners' engagement, assessment methods, professional development, interprofessional education, and so forth, faculty members often struggle to modernize their teaching practices. Communities of practice (CoP) for faculty development offer an effective and sustainable approach for knowledge management and implementation of best practices. A successful CoP creates and shares knowledge in the context of a specific practice toward the development of expertise. CoPs' collaborative nature, based on the co-creation of practical solutions to daily problems, aligns well with the goals of applying best practices in health professions education and training new faculty members. In our article, we share 12 tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. The tips were based on a comprehensive literature review and the authors' experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2018.1552782

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Tio, R. A., & Steinert, Y.
Affiliations
  • Emergency Medicine Department School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
143-149
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2913616384
Cited by
216
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (/, 8-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
communities of practice, faculty development, medical education, knowledge management, best practice implementation, cooperative learning, health professions education
MeSH terms
Interdisciplinary Placement, Education, Medical, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Learning, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review