Cited by 258Innovations in Medical EducationEvaluation of Teaching PracticesInnovative Teaching Methods

Faculty development: From workshops to communities of practice

Steinert, Yvonne·2010·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Participating in a faculty development workshop gives me a sense of community, self-awareness, motivation and validation of current practices and beliefs ….Steinert (2008)Faculty development, or st...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01421591003677897

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinert, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Steinert, Yvonne
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2010-01
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
425-428
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2160920320
Cited by
258
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
faculty development, communities of practice, workshops, medical education, professional development, self-awareness, motivation
MeSH terms
Education, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Staff Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review