Cited by 120Gender, Sexuality, and EducationGender and Feminist StudiesPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

Gender undone: subversion, regulation and embodiment in the work of Judith Butler

Open access
Nayak, Anoop, Kehily, Mary Jane·2006·British Journal of Sociology of Education

Abstract

Judith Butler’s philosophical writings on identity have provided inspiring, if occasionally ‘troubling’, ways of rethinking gender. A key contribution has been the challenge to conventional social constructionist ideas and thinking on subjectivity. In developing a paradigm of performativity, Butler’s work takes us beyond the territory of identity secured in much previous feminist poststructuralist debate. She does so in part by providing an ontological critique—a type of ‘queering’ if you will—of such seemingly knowable categories as ‘man’, ‘woman’, ‘girl’ or ‘boy’. In addressing the radical interruption in identity theorising offered in Butler’s writing, we consider the arresting claim that identity is a type of ‘doing’ that is only made manifest at the point of action. To explore the theoretical, empirical and political issues at stake, we draw especially upon Butler’s writings on identity and ally this to some of our own ethnographic research on gender, youth and schooling. Here, we explore young people’s compulsion to enact and display stylised forms of gender embodiment, and the spectacular enactments of transgression that can elicit a practice of gender dissimulation. Our focus is upon the subversion, regulation and embodiment of gender identities and its implications for the sociology of education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01425690600803038

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Nayak, A., & Kehily, M. J.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Nayak, Anoop
Venue
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2006-09
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
459-472
ISSN
  • 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3346
OpenAlex
W2033404415
Cited by
120
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
Judith Butler, gender identity, performativity, social constructionism, subjectivity, queering, gender embodiment, gender subversion, gender regulation, youth, school education, sociology of education, feminist poststructuralism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review