Cited by 114Global Educational Policies and ReformsTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

I, Teacher: re‐territorialization of teachers’ multi‐faceted agency in globalized education

Open access
Vongalis‐Macrow, Athena·2007·British Journal of Sociology of Education

Abstract

Analysis of teachers’ agency as multifarious change, embedded in educational reform in the global era, stands largely unexamined in educational policy. Although the concept of teachers as agents has political implications, beyond this, examining teachers’ agency offers ways of describing and reviewing changes to teachers’ work and relations within evolving education systems. Local systems draw from globally orientated education policies, which continue to influence to the way that local systems redesign education. In the global context, education systems are complex interactions between structure and agency, evidenced as ‘multiplicity undergoing change’. In other words, there is dynamic and dialectic interplay between structure and agency. Teachers’ agency, germane to dynamic interplay, means that teachers are not only engaging in the reproduction of structural change aligning globalization‐driven reforms to their work and practice, but also, in adapting and reacting to new structural conditions, they are transformed through their actions. In this paper, the focus becomes teachers’ agency as a framework for understanding how teachers are redesigned and reassembled to do things differently within restructured education systems. Finally, the discussion considers the possible consequences of teachers work and practice, given teachers’ agency relative to the macro policy of superfigures and the transitional national/global structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01425690701369376

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authority of teacher expertise is underutilized in educational change.

    “Vongalis-Macrow (2007) claims that the authority of teacher expertise is underutilized in educational change.”
  • Vongalis-Macrow (2007) identifies a diminution of aspects of teacher agency related to authority and autonomy and an increase of obligations which restricts teachers' agency narrowly to decisions about techniques for teaching and learning in the classroom.

    “Vongalis-Macrow (2007, p.436), similarly identifies a 'diminution' of the aspects of teacher agency related to authority and autonomy and the increase of obligations which restricts teachers' agency narrowly to decisions about techniques for teaching and learning in the classroom.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vongalis‐Macrow, A.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Vongalis‐Macrow, Athena
Venue
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2007-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
425-439
ISSN
  • 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3346
OpenAlex
W2017582685
Cited by
114
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
teacher agency, reterritorialization, globalization of education, educational reform, structure and agency, global education policy, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review