The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback.
Abstract
Feedback plays an important role in Postgraduate Medical Education and is indispensable in surgical training. Improvement in operating skills, for example, requires constant feedback between teacher and learner to promote reflection on performance. Prior to providing workshops on giving effective feedback, the goal of this study was to assess the perceptions of attending surgeons and residents on feedback practices in our program. We show a startling disparity in perceptions of feedback frequency and skills. The results were used in planning a Workshop on Giving Feedback for our faculty. The effectiveness of this Workshop will be assessed at a later date by administering the same questionnaire.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Current models of feedback in practice are frequently reported to lack dialogic partnership with shared responsibilities. 8,13”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Learners consistently report feedback provision as insufficient, a notion that is as consistently disputed by supervisors 8-10”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility
Bing-You, R. G., Paterson, J., & Levine, M. A. (1997) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/01421599709019346 · Cited by 161
Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback
Gil, D. H., Heins, M., & Jones, P. (1984) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-198411000-00003 · Cited by 110
Dimensions of feedback in clinical teaching
Frye, A., Hollingsworth, M. A., Wymer, A., & Hinds, M. A. (1996) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199601000-00049 · Cited by 14
Simon, S. R., Sousa, P. J., & MacBride, S. E. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 11
Words hard to say and hard to hear
Spickard, A. (1998) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00034.x · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- BTVO-YOU R.G., 1997, residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility, Medical Teacher, 19, pp. 40
- FRYE A.W., 1996, A descriptive study, Academic Medicine, 71, pp. 579—S81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is feedback in clinical education?
Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x · Cited by 686
The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000560 · Cited by 572
AMEE Guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment
Ramani, S., & Leinster, S. (2008) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590802061613 · Cited by 588
Giving feedback in clinical settings
Cantillon, P., & Sargeant, J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1961 · Cited by 460
Feedback for learners in medical education: What is known? A scoping review.
Bing-You, R., Hayes, V., Varaklis, K., Trowbridge, R., Kemp, H., & McKelvy, D. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001578 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Sender Liberman, A., Liberman, M., Steinert, Y., McLeod, P., & Meterissian, S.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 470-472
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2151711082
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- feedback, surgical training, attending surgeons, surgical residents, feedback frequency, operating skills, graduate medical education, faculty workshops
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Data Collection, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Hospitals, University, Humans, Internship and Residency, Medical Staff, Hospital, Quebec, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Specialties, Surgical, Teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
