The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both?
Open accessAbstract
Land use classification is an important part of many remote sensing applications. A lot of research has gone into the application of statistical and neural network classifiers to remote‐sensing images. This research involves the study and implementation of a new pattern recognition technique introduced within the framework of statistical learning theory called Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and its application to remote‐sensing image classification. Standard classifiers such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN) need a number of training samples that exponentially increase with the dimension of the input feature space. With a limited number of training samples, the classification rate thus decreases as the dimensionality increases. SVMs are independent of the dimensionality of feature space as the main idea behind this classification technique is to separate the classes with a surface that maximizes the margin between them, using boundary pixels to create the decision surface. Results from SVMs are compared with traditional Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) and an ANN classifier. The findings suggest that the ANN and SVM classifiers perform better than the traditional MLC. The SVM and the ANN show comparable results. However, accuracy is dependent on factors such as the number of hidden nodes (in the case of ANN) and kernel parameters (in the case of SVM). The training time taken by the SVM is several magnitudes less.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001 · Cited by 3,473
Artificial intelligence applications in solid waste management: A systematic research review
Abdallah, M., Abu Talib, M., Feroz, S., Nasir, Q., Abdalla, H., & Mahfood, B. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.057 · Cited by 523
Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images
Knorn, J., Rabe, A., Radeloff, V. C., Kuemmerle, T., Kozak, J., & Hostert, P. (2009) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.010 · Cited by 255
Sample size determination for image classification accuracy assessment and comparison
Foody, G. M. (2009) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160903130937 · Cited by 248
Solano Meza, J. K., Orjuela Yepes, D., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., & Rodrigo-Clavero, M.-E. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054256 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, B., & Candade, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12-21
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1185-1206
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2022106816
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431160701294661
- The paper
- Dixon, B., & Candade, N. (2008). Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: one or the other, or both? International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701294661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.